“[Bolingbroke] weighs [Richard] down” : The Idea of Perfect Monarch in Richard II

In his history plays Shakespeare presents the idea of perfect monarch who achieves to unite the nation regardless of class distinctions, and demonstrates that if a sovereign violates the laws and disregards common consent, s/he fails to exercise justice, and consequently establishes despotic rule....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emine Seda ÇAĞLAYAN MAZANOĞLU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Gaziantep University 2018-07-01
Series:Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/504191
id doaj-38cfa5ad3970483984aa68877cbd5c91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38cfa5ad3970483984aa68877cbd5c912020-11-25T02:01:18ZengGaziantep UniversityGaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences1303-00942149-54592018-07-0117384485610.21547/jss.409427“[Bolingbroke] weighs [Richard] down” : The Idea of Perfect Monarch in Richard IIEmine Seda ÇAĞLAYAN MAZANOĞLU0 Hacettepe ÜniversitesiIn his history plays Shakespeare presents the idea of perfect monarch who achieves to unite the nation regardless of class distinctions, and demonstrates that if a sovereign violates the laws and disregards common consent, s/he fails to exercise justice, and consequently establishes despotic rule. Hence, the aim of this article is to argue that in Richard II Shakespeare puts forth the distinction between a perfect monarch and a tyrant through the comparison of Richard II, the legitimate king, and Bolingbroke, who accedes as King Henry IV after he usurps the throne. Richard is presented as an unjust king who violates the laws and customs, suppresses his people through illegal monetary practices, empowers insufficient counsellors, and loses the love and support of the noblemen and the common men; whereas, Bolingbroke is portrayed as an effective sovereign as he respects the laws and customs, fights injustice and gains the admiration of the nobility and the commoners. Therefore, it will be argued that as Shakespeare presents, being law-abiding and protecting the rights of the people are the qualities of an ideal ruler while flouting the laws and dispossessing the people are the features of an ineffective and a despotic monarch. Accordingly, it will also be demonstrated that through the medieval English history and politics Shakespeare refers to the idea of perfect monarch in the Elizabethan era. He refers to Elizabeth I’s abuse of her sovereign authority to entrust her favourites with authority and to suppress her people by corrupt financial practices.http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/504191William ShakespearePerfect MonarchPowerthe Elizabethan Era
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emine Seda ÇAĞLAYAN MAZANOĞLU
spellingShingle Emine Seda ÇAĞLAYAN MAZANOĞLU
“[Bolingbroke] weighs [Richard] down” : The Idea of Perfect Monarch in Richard II
Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
William Shakespeare
Perfect Monarch
Power
the Elizabethan Era
author_facet Emine Seda ÇAĞLAYAN MAZANOĞLU
author_sort Emine Seda ÇAĞLAYAN MAZANOĞLU
title “[Bolingbroke] weighs [Richard] down” : The Idea of Perfect Monarch in Richard II
title_short “[Bolingbroke] weighs [Richard] down” : The Idea of Perfect Monarch in Richard II
title_full “[Bolingbroke] weighs [Richard] down” : The Idea of Perfect Monarch in Richard II
title_fullStr “[Bolingbroke] weighs [Richard] down” : The Idea of Perfect Monarch in Richard II
title_full_unstemmed “[Bolingbroke] weighs [Richard] down” : The Idea of Perfect Monarch in Richard II
title_sort “[bolingbroke] weighs [richard] down” : the idea of perfect monarch in richard ii
publisher Gaziantep University
series Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
issn 1303-0094
2149-5459
publishDate 2018-07-01
description In his history plays Shakespeare presents the idea of perfect monarch who achieves to unite the nation regardless of class distinctions, and demonstrates that if a sovereign violates the laws and disregards common consent, s/he fails to exercise justice, and consequently establishes despotic rule. Hence, the aim of this article is to argue that in Richard II Shakespeare puts forth the distinction between a perfect monarch and a tyrant through the comparison of Richard II, the legitimate king, and Bolingbroke, who accedes as King Henry IV after he usurps the throne. Richard is presented as an unjust king who violates the laws and customs, suppresses his people through illegal monetary practices, empowers insufficient counsellors, and loses the love and support of the noblemen and the common men; whereas, Bolingbroke is portrayed as an effective sovereign as he respects the laws and customs, fights injustice and gains the admiration of the nobility and the commoners. Therefore, it will be argued that as Shakespeare presents, being law-abiding and protecting the rights of the people are the qualities of an ideal ruler while flouting the laws and dispossessing the people are the features of an ineffective and a despotic monarch. Accordingly, it will also be demonstrated that through the medieval English history and politics Shakespeare refers to the idea of perfect monarch in the Elizabethan era. He refers to Elizabeth I’s abuse of her sovereign authority to entrust her favourites with authority and to suppress her people by corrupt financial practices.
topic William Shakespeare
Perfect Monarch
Power
the Elizabethan Era
url http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/504191
work_keys_str_mv AT eminesedacaglayanmazanoglu bolingbrokeweighsricharddowntheideaofperfectmonarchinrichardii
_version_ 1724957532488728576