Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation
. The paper proposes a theoretical and methodological framework to study art as an autonomous reality, where knowledge is seen as a set of collectively shared meaning structures dynamically socially created throughout communication. The latter is triggered by artworks as stimuli, intermediaries and...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Социологический журнал |
Online Access: | http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/3064/submission/proof/3064-61-7898-1-10-20160601.pdf |
id |
doaj-38c45010a61142cea1f5667504321b04 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-38c45010a61142cea1f5667504321b042020-11-25T02:55:16ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952015-12-0121483310.19181/socjour.2015.21.4.30643064Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge CreationNikita V. Basov0Aleksandra E. NenkoAnisya M. Khokhlova1Center for German and European studies (St Petersburg State University – Bielefeld University)St Petersburg State University. The paper proposes a theoretical and methodological framework to study art as an autonomous reality, where knowledge is seen as a set of collectively shared meaning structures dynamically socially created throughout communication. The latter is triggered by artworks as stimuli, intermediaries and products of communication, evoking intellectual and emotional resonance between the creators and various publics, thus being both catalysts and reference points in the process of collective meaning construction. It is shown, that the mechanisms of knowledge construction in art are communicative by nature, as well as dynamic and heterogeneous, bringing various participants to interact in numerous situations enabling shared meaning creation, including interactions that can hardly be labelled as professional. Yet, knowledge structures generated and reproduced by the artistic reality should be seen as meaning structures in their own right, rather than a bare projection of social relations and conventions represented by the reality of everyday life. Though using the meaning constructs of everyday life and objects as building blocks, creative work and artistic communication linked to it are often able to produce new combinations of materials and meanings not corresponding the existing social relations and conventions. This makes the boundaries between the reality of art and the reality of everyday life transparent yet persistent, which allows art to maintain autonomy of its knowledge structures and communication patterns while at the same time to expand and to involve new participants into its reality.http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/3064/submission/proof/3064-61-7898-1-10-20160601.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nikita V. Basov Aleksandra E. Nenko Anisya M. Khokhlova |
spellingShingle |
Nikita V. Basov Aleksandra E. Nenko Anisya M. Khokhlova Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation Социологический журнал |
author_facet |
Nikita V. Basov Aleksandra E. Nenko Anisya M. Khokhlova |
author_sort |
Nikita V. Basov |
title |
Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation |
title_short |
Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation |
title_full |
Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation |
title_fullStr |
Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation |
title_sort |
reality of art: communication and knowledge creation |
publisher |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology |
series |
Социологический журнал |
issn |
1562-2495 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
. The paper proposes a theoretical and methodological framework to study art as an autonomous reality, where knowledge is seen as a set of collectively shared meaning structures dynamically socially created throughout communication. The latter is triggered by artworks as stimuli, intermediaries and products of communication, evoking intellectual and emotional resonance between the creators and various publics, thus being both catalysts and reference points in the process of collective meaning construction. It is shown, that the mechanisms of knowledge construction in art are communicative by nature, as well as dynamic and heterogeneous, bringing various participants to interact in numerous situations enabling shared meaning creation, including interactions that can hardly be labelled as professional. Yet, knowledge structures generated and reproduced by the artistic reality should be seen as meaning structures in their own right, rather than a bare projection of social relations and conventions represented by the reality of everyday life. Though using the meaning constructs of everyday life and objects as building blocks, creative work and artistic communication linked to it are often able to produce new combinations of materials and meanings not corresponding the existing social relations and conventions. This makes the boundaries between the reality of art and the reality of everyday life transparent yet persistent, which allows art to maintain autonomy of its knowledge structures and communication patterns while at the same time to expand and to involve new participants into its reality. |
url |
http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/3064/submission/proof/3064-61-7898-1-10-20160601.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nikitavbasov realityofartcommunicationandknowledgecreation AT aleksandraenenko realityofartcommunicationandknowledgecreation AT anisyamkhokhlova realityofartcommunicationandknowledgecreation |
_version_ |
1724717010385895424 |