Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation

. The paper proposes a theoretical and methodological framework to study art as an autonomous reality, where knowledge is seen as a set of collectively shared meaning structures dynamically socially created throughout communication. The latter is triggered by artworks as stimuli, intermediaries and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikita V. Basov, Aleksandra E. Nenko, Anisya M. Khokhlova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2015-12-01
Series:Социологический журнал
Online Access:http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/3064/submission/proof/3064-61-7898-1-10-20160601.pdf
id doaj-38c45010a61142cea1f5667504321b04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38c45010a61142cea1f5667504321b042020-11-25T02:55:16ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952015-12-0121483310.19181/socjour.2015.21.4.30643064Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge CreationNikita V. Basov0Aleksandra E. NenkoAnisya M. Khokhlova1Center for German and European studies (St Petersburg State University – Bielefeld University)St Petersburg State University. The paper proposes a theoretical and methodological framework to study art as an autonomous reality, where knowledge is seen as a set of collectively shared meaning structures dynamically socially created throughout communication. The latter is triggered by artworks as stimuli, intermediaries and products of communication, evoking intellectual and emotional resonance between the creators and various publics, thus being both catalysts and reference points in the process of collective meaning construction. It is shown, that the mechanisms of knowledge construction in art are communicative by nature, as well as dynamic and heterogeneous, bringing various participants to interact in numerous situations enabling shared meaning creation, including interactions that can hardly be labelled as professional. Yet, knowledge structures generated and reproduced by the artistic reality should be seen as meaning structures in their own right, rather than a bare projection of social relations and conventions represented by the reality of everyday life. Though using the meaning constructs of everyday life and objects as building blocks, creative work and artistic communication linked to it are often able to produce new combinations of materials and meanings not corresponding the existing social relations and conventions. This makes the boundaries between the reality of art and the reality of everyday life transparent yet persistent, which allows art to maintain autonomy of its knowledge structures and communication patterns while at the same time to expand and to involve new participants into its reality.http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/3064/submission/proof/3064-61-7898-1-10-20160601.pdf
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikita V. Basov
Aleksandra E. Nenko
Anisya M. Khokhlova
spellingShingle Nikita V. Basov
Aleksandra E. Nenko
Anisya M. Khokhlova
Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation
Социологический журнал
author_facet Nikita V. Basov
Aleksandra E. Nenko
Anisya M. Khokhlova
author_sort Nikita V. Basov
title Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation
title_short Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation
title_full Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation
title_fullStr Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation
title_full_unstemmed Reality of Art: Communication and Knowledge Creation
title_sort reality of art: communication and knowledge creation
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
series Социологический журнал
issn 1562-2495
publishDate 2015-12-01
description . The paper proposes a theoretical and methodological framework to study art as an autonomous reality, where knowledge is seen as a set of collectively shared meaning structures dynamically socially created throughout communication. The latter is triggered by artworks as stimuli, intermediaries and products of communication, evoking intellectual and emotional resonance between the creators and various publics, thus being both catalysts and reference points in the process of collective meaning construction. It is shown, that the mechanisms of knowledge construction in art are communicative by nature, as well as dynamic and heterogeneous, bringing various participants to interact in numerous situations enabling shared meaning creation, including interactions that can hardly be labelled as professional. Yet, knowledge structures generated and reproduced by the artistic reality should be seen as meaning structures in their own right, rather than a bare projection of social relations and conventions represented by the reality of everyday life. Though using the meaning constructs of everyday life and objects as building blocks, creative work and artistic communication linked to it are often able to produce new combinations of materials and meanings not corresponding the existing social relations and conventions. This makes the boundaries between the reality of art and the reality of everyday life transparent yet persistent, which allows art to maintain autonomy of its knowledge structures and communication patterns while at the same time to expand and to involve new participants into its reality.
url http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/3064/submission/proof/3064-61-7898-1-10-20160601.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nikitavbasov realityofartcommunicationandknowledgecreation
AT aleksandraenenko realityofartcommunicationandknowledgecreation
AT anisyamkhokhlova realityofartcommunicationandknowledgecreation
_version_ 1724717010385895424