Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
A meta-analysis was carried out to investigate the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity. Through meta-analyzing these relationships, we are able to assess the true estimate of their magnitude. The results revealed a strong correlatio...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-04-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019841925 |
id |
doaj-38b367a762344dc2beb251ac65bc7c5e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-38b367a762344dc2beb251ac65bc7c5e2020-11-25T03:45:23ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-04-01910.1177/2158244019841925Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisAudra Balundė0Lina Jovarauskaitė1Mykolas Simas Poškus2Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, LithuaniaMykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, LithuaniaMykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, LithuaniaA meta-analysis was carried out to investigate the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity. Through meta-analyzing these relationships, we are able to assess the true estimate of their magnitude. The results revealed a strong correlation between measures of connectedness with nature and environmental identity ( r = .75 [0.67, 0.83], k = 11) as well as environmental self-identity ( r = .57 [.31, .84], k = 5). Further moderation analysis indicated that the relationship between connectedness with nature and environmental identity is different for graphical and questionnaire instruments used for assessing connectedness with nature; the aggregated correlation for graphical instruments ( r = .62 [.56, .67], k = 9) was significantly lower than for questionnaires ( r = .82 [.74, .91], k = 9). We suggest revisiting the various instruments assessing human–nature relatedness to maximize unique variance among them.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019841925 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Audra Balundė Lina Jovarauskaitė Mykolas Simas Poškus |
spellingShingle |
Audra Balundė Lina Jovarauskaitė Mykolas Simas Poškus Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Audra Balundė Lina Jovarauskaitė Mykolas Simas Poškus |
author_sort |
Audra Balundė |
title |
Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
exploring the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
A meta-analysis was carried out to investigate the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity. Through meta-analyzing these relationships, we are able to assess the true estimate of their magnitude. The results revealed a strong correlation between measures of connectedness with nature and environmental identity ( r = .75 [0.67, 0.83], k = 11) as well as environmental self-identity ( r = .57 [.31, .84], k = 5). Further moderation analysis indicated that the relationship between connectedness with nature and environmental identity is different for graphical and questionnaire instruments used for assessing connectedness with nature; the aggregated correlation for graphical instruments ( r = .62 [.56, .67], k = 9) was significantly lower than for questionnaires ( r = .82 [.74, .91], k = 9). We suggest revisiting the various instruments assessing human–nature relatedness to maximize unique variance among them. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019841925 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT audrabalunde exploringtherelationshipbetweenconnectednesswithnatureenvironmentalidentityandenvironmentalselfidentityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linajovarauskaite exploringtherelationshipbetweenconnectednesswithnatureenvironmentalidentityandenvironmentalselfidentityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mykolassimasposkus exploringtherelationshipbetweenconnectednesswithnatureenvironmentalidentityandenvironmentalselfidentityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1724509803760320512 |