Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis was carried out to investigate the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity. Through meta-analyzing these relationships, we are able to assess the true estimate of their magnitude. The results revealed a strong correlatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Audra Balundė, Lina Jovarauskaitė, Mykolas Simas Poškus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-04-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019841925
id doaj-38b367a762344dc2beb251ac65bc7c5e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38b367a762344dc2beb251ac65bc7c5e2020-11-25T03:45:23ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-04-01910.1177/2158244019841925Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisAudra Balundė0Lina Jovarauskaitė1Mykolas Simas Poškus2Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, LithuaniaMykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, LithuaniaMykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, LithuaniaA meta-analysis was carried out to investigate the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity. Through meta-analyzing these relationships, we are able to assess the true estimate of their magnitude. The results revealed a strong correlation between measures of connectedness with nature and environmental identity ( r = .75 [0.67, 0.83], k = 11) as well as environmental self-identity ( r = .57 [.31, .84], k = 5). Further moderation analysis indicated that the relationship between connectedness with nature and environmental identity is different for graphical and questionnaire instruments used for assessing connectedness with nature; the aggregated correlation for graphical instruments ( r = .62 [.56, .67], k = 9) was significantly lower than for questionnaires ( r = .82 [.74, .91], k = 9). We suggest revisiting the various instruments assessing human–nature relatedness to maximize unique variance among them.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019841925
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Audra Balundė
Lina Jovarauskaitė
Mykolas Simas Poškus
spellingShingle Audra Balundė
Lina Jovarauskaitė
Mykolas Simas Poškus
Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
SAGE Open
author_facet Audra Balundė
Lina Jovarauskaitė
Mykolas Simas Poškus
author_sort Audra Balundė
title Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Relationship Between Connectedness With Nature, Environmental Identity, and Environmental Self-Identity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort exploring the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2019-04-01
description A meta-analysis was carried out to investigate the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity. Through meta-analyzing these relationships, we are able to assess the true estimate of their magnitude. The results revealed a strong correlation between measures of connectedness with nature and environmental identity ( r = .75 [0.67, 0.83], k = 11) as well as environmental self-identity ( r = .57 [.31, .84], k = 5). Further moderation analysis indicated that the relationship between connectedness with nature and environmental identity is different for graphical and questionnaire instruments used for assessing connectedness with nature; the aggregated correlation for graphical instruments ( r = .62 [.56, .67], k = 9) was significantly lower than for questionnaires ( r = .82 [.74, .91], k = 9). We suggest revisiting the various instruments assessing human–nature relatedness to maximize unique variance among them.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019841925
work_keys_str_mv AT audrabalunde exploringtherelationshipbetweenconnectednesswithnatureenvironmentalidentityandenvironmentalselfidentityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linajovarauskaite exploringtherelationshipbetweenconnectednesswithnatureenvironmentalidentityandenvironmentalselfidentityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mykolassimasposkus exploringtherelationshipbetweenconnectednesswithnatureenvironmentalidentityandenvironmentalselfidentityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724509803760320512