Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines

This paper provides a critical examination of the taken for granted nature of the codes/guidelines used towards the creation of designed spaces, their social relations with designers, and their agency in designing for people with disabilities. We conducted case studies at three national museums in C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janice Rieger, Megan Strickfaden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-02-01
Series:Societies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/1/6
id doaj-38a93e5cac134388a1a5f2fb2b4decc8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38a93e5cac134388a1a5f2fb2b4decc82020-11-24T22:40:40ZengMDPI AGSocieties2075-46982016-02-0161610.3390/soc6010006soc6010006Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/GuidelinesJanice Rieger0Megan Strickfaden1Department of Interior Design, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, AustraliaDepartment of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2N1, CanadaThis paper provides a critical examination of the taken for granted nature of the codes/guidelines used towards the creation of designed spaces, their social relations with designers, and their agency in designing for people with disabilities. We conducted case studies at three national museums in Canada where we began by questioning societal representations of disability within and through material culture through the potential of actor-network theory where non-human actors have considerable agency. Specifically, our exploration looks into how representations of disability for designing, are interpreted through mediums such as codes, standards and guidelines. We accomplish this through: deep analyses of the museums’ built environments (outdoors and indoors); interviewed curators, architects and designers involved in the creation of the spaces/displays; completed dialoguing while in motion interviews with people who have disabilities within the spaces; and analyzed available documents relating to the creation of the museums. Through analyses of our rich data set involving the mapping of codes/guidelines in their “representation” of disability and their contributions in “fixing” disability, this paper takes an alternative approach to designing for/with disability by aiming to question societal representations of disability within and through material culture.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/1/6actor-network theoryagencyarchitectural designcritical disability studiesembodied experiencesknowledge productionmuseumspower relationsrepresentationspatial relationships
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Janice Rieger
Megan Strickfaden
spellingShingle Janice Rieger
Megan Strickfaden
Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines
Societies
actor-network theory
agency
architectural design
critical disability studies
embodied experiences
knowledge production
museums
power relations
representation
spatial relationships
author_facet Janice Rieger
Megan Strickfaden
author_sort Janice Rieger
title Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines
title_short Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines
title_full Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines
title_fullStr Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines
title_sort taken for granted: material relations between disability and codes/guidelines
publisher MDPI AG
series Societies
issn 2075-4698
publishDate 2016-02-01
description This paper provides a critical examination of the taken for granted nature of the codes/guidelines used towards the creation of designed spaces, their social relations with designers, and their agency in designing for people with disabilities. We conducted case studies at three national museums in Canada where we began by questioning societal representations of disability within and through material culture through the potential of actor-network theory where non-human actors have considerable agency. Specifically, our exploration looks into how representations of disability for designing, are interpreted through mediums such as codes, standards and guidelines. We accomplish this through: deep analyses of the museums’ built environments (outdoors and indoors); interviewed curators, architects and designers involved in the creation of the spaces/displays; completed dialoguing while in motion interviews with people who have disabilities within the spaces; and analyzed available documents relating to the creation of the museums. Through analyses of our rich data set involving the mapping of codes/guidelines in their “representation” of disability and their contributions in “fixing” disability, this paper takes an alternative approach to designing for/with disability by aiming to question societal representations of disability within and through material culture.
topic actor-network theory
agency
architectural design
critical disability studies
embodied experiences
knowledge production
museums
power relations
representation
spatial relationships
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT janicerieger takenforgrantedmaterialrelationsbetweendisabilityandcodesguidelines
AT meganstrickfaden takenforgrantedmaterialrelationsbetweendisabilityandcodesguidelines
_version_ 1725704042858938368