Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines
This paper provides a critical examination of the taken for granted nature of the codes/guidelines used towards the creation of designed spaces, their social relations with designers, and their agency in designing for people with disabilities. We conducted case studies at three national museums in C...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-02-01
|
Series: | Societies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/1/6 |
id |
doaj-38a93e5cac134388a1a5f2fb2b4decc8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-38a93e5cac134388a1a5f2fb2b4decc82020-11-24T22:40:40ZengMDPI AGSocieties2075-46982016-02-0161610.3390/soc6010006soc6010006Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/GuidelinesJanice Rieger0Megan Strickfaden1Department of Interior Design, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, AustraliaDepartment of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2N1, CanadaThis paper provides a critical examination of the taken for granted nature of the codes/guidelines used towards the creation of designed spaces, their social relations with designers, and their agency in designing for people with disabilities. We conducted case studies at three national museums in Canada where we began by questioning societal representations of disability within and through material culture through the potential of actor-network theory where non-human actors have considerable agency. Specifically, our exploration looks into how representations of disability for designing, are interpreted through mediums such as codes, standards and guidelines. We accomplish this through: deep analyses of the museums’ built environments (outdoors and indoors); interviewed curators, architects and designers involved in the creation of the spaces/displays; completed dialoguing while in motion interviews with people who have disabilities within the spaces; and analyzed available documents relating to the creation of the museums. Through analyses of our rich data set involving the mapping of codes/guidelines in their “representation” of disability and their contributions in “fixing” disability, this paper takes an alternative approach to designing for/with disability by aiming to question societal representations of disability within and through material culture.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/1/6actor-network theoryagencyarchitectural designcritical disability studiesembodied experiencesknowledge productionmuseumspower relationsrepresentationspatial relationships |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Janice Rieger Megan Strickfaden |
spellingShingle |
Janice Rieger Megan Strickfaden Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines Societies actor-network theory agency architectural design critical disability studies embodied experiences knowledge production museums power relations representation spatial relationships |
author_facet |
Janice Rieger Megan Strickfaden |
author_sort |
Janice Rieger |
title |
Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines |
title_short |
Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines |
title_full |
Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines |
title_fullStr |
Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed |
Taken for Granted: Material Relations Between Disability and Codes/Guidelines |
title_sort |
taken for granted: material relations between disability and codes/guidelines |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Societies |
issn |
2075-4698 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
This paper provides a critical examination of the taken for granted nature of the codes/guidelines used towards the creation of designed spaces, their social relations with designers, and their agency in designing for people with disabilities. We conducted case studies at three national museums in Canada where we began by questioning societal representations of disability within and through material culture through the potential of actor-network theory where non-human actors have considerable agency. Specifically, our exploration looks into how representations of disability for designing, are interpreted through mediums such as codes, standards and guidelines. We accomplish this through: deep analyses of the museums’ built environments (outdoors and indoors); interviewed curators, architects and designers involved in the creation of the spaces/displays; completed dialoguing while in motion interviews with people who have disabilities within the spaces; and analyzed available documents relating to the creation of the museums. Through analyses of our rich data set involving the mapping of codes/guidelines in their “representation” of disability and their contributions in “fixing” disability, this paper takes an alternative approach to designing for/with disability by aiming to question societal representations of disability within and through material culture. |
topic |
actor-network theory agency architectural design critical disability studies embodied experiences knowledge production museums power relations representation spatial relationships |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/1/6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janicerieger takenforgrantedmaterialrelationsbetweendisabilityandcodesguidelines AT meganstrickfaden takenforgrantedmaterialrelationsbetweendisabilityandcodesguidelines |
_version_ |
1725704042858938368 |