The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution

Glyoxal, the smallest dicarbonyl, which has recently been observed from space, is expected to provide indications on volatile organic compounds (VOC) oxidation and secondary aerosol formation in the troposphere. Glyoxal (CHOCHO) is known to be mostly of natural origin and is produced during biogenic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Myriokefalitakis, M. Vrekoussis, K. Tsigaridis, F. Wittrock, A. Richter, C. Brühl, R. Volkamer, J. P. Burrows, M. Kanakidou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2008-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/4965/2008/acp-8-4965-2008.pdf
id doaj-38a75f74d301472ba4cffaf59b8365ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38a75f74d301472ba4cffaf59b8365ab2020-11-24T22:07:21ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242008-08-0181649654981The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distributionS. MyriokefalitakisM. VrekoussisK. TsigaridisF. WittrockA. RichterC. BrühlR. VolkamerJ. P. BurrowsM. KanakidouGlyoxal, the smallest dicarbonyl, which has recently been observed from space, is expected to provide indications on volatile organic compounds (VOC) oxidation and secondary aerosol formation in the troposphere. Glyoxal (CHOCHO) is known to be mostly of natural origin and is produced during biogenic VOC oxidation. However, a number of anthropogenically emitted hydrocarbons, like acetylene and aromatics, have been positively identified as CHOCHO precursors. The present study investigates the contribution of pollution to the CHOCHO levels by taking into account the secondary chemical formation of CHOCHO from precursors emitted from biogenic, anthropogenic and biomass burning sources. The impact of potential primary land emissions of CHOCHO is also investigated. A global 3-dimensional chemistry transport model of the troposphere (TM4-ECPL) able to simulate the gas phase chemistry coupled with all major aerosol components is used. <br><br> The secondary anthropogenic contribution from fossil fuel and industrial VOCs emissions oxidation to the CHOCHO columns is found to reach 20–70% in the industrialized areas of the Northern Hemisphere and 3–20% in the tropics. This secondary CHOCHO source is on average three times larger than that from oxidation of VOCs from biomass burning sources. The chemical production of CHOCHO is calculated to equal to about 56 Tg y<sup>−1</sup> with 70% being produced from biogenic hydrocarbons oxidation, 17% from acetylene, 11% from aromatic chemistry and 2% from ethene and propene. CHOCHO is destroyed in the troposphere primarily by reaction with OH radicals (23%) and by photolysis (63%), but it is also removed from the atmosphere through wet (8%) and dry deposition (6%). Potential formation of secondary organic aerosol through CHOCHO losses on/in aerosols and clouds is neglected here due to the significant uncertainties associated with the underlying chemistry. The global annual mean CHOCHO burden and lifetime in the model domain are estimated to be 0.02 Tg (equal to the global burden seen by SCIAMACHY over land for the year 2005) and about 3 h, respectively. The model results are compared with satellite observations of CHOCHO columns. When accounting only for the secondary sources of CHOCHO in the model, the model underestimates CHOCHO columns observed by satellites. This is attributed to an overestimate of CHOCHO sinks or a missing global source of about 20 Tg y<sup>−1</sup>. Using the current primary emissions of CHOCHO from biomass burning together with the anthropogenic combustion sources of about 7 Tg y<sup>−1</sup> leads to an overestimate by the model over hot spot areas. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/4965/2008/acp-8-4965-2008.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Myriokefalitakis
M. Vrekoussis
K. Tsigaridis
F. Wittrock
A. Richter
C. Brühl
R. Volkamer
J. P. Burrows
M. Kanakidou
spellingShingle S. Myriokefalitakis
M. Vrekoussis
K. Tsigaridis
F. Wittrock
A. Richter
C. Brühl
R. Volkamer
J. P. Burrows
M. Kanakidou
The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet S. Myriokefalitakis
M. Vrekoussis
K. Tsigaridis
F. Wittrock
A. Richter
C. Brühl
R. Volkamer
J. P. Burrows
M. Kanakidou
author_sort S. Myriokefalitakis
title The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution
title_short The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution
title_full The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution
title_fullStr The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution
title_full_unstemmed The influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution
title_sort influence of natural and anthropogenic secondary sources on the glyoxal global distribution
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2008-08-01
description Glyoxal, the smallest dicarbonyl, which has recently been observed from space, is expected to provide indications on volatile organic compounds (VOC) oxidation and secondary aerosol formation in the troposphere. Glyoxal (CHOCHO) is known to be mostly of natural origin and is produced during biogenic VOC oxidation. However, a number of anthropogenically emitted hydrocarbons, like acetylene and aromatics, have been positively identified as CHOCHO precursors. The present study investigates the contribution of pollution to the CHOCHO levels by taking into account the secondary chemical formation of CHOCHO from precursors emitted from biogenic, anthropogenic and biomass burning sources. The impact of potential primary land emissions of CHOCHO is also investigated. A global 3-dimensional chemistry transport model of the troposphere (TM4-ECPL) able to simulate the gas phase chemistry coupled with all major aerosol components is used. <br><br> The secondary anthropogenic contribution from fossil fuel and industrial VOCs emissions oxidation to the CHOCHO columns is found to reach 20–70% in the industrialized areas of the Northern Hemisphere and 3–20% in the tropics. This secondary CHOCHO source is on average three times larger than that from oxidation of VOCs from biomass burning sources. The chemical production of CHOCHO is calculated to equal to about 56 Tg y<sup>−1</sup> with 70% being produced from biogenic hydrocarbons oxidation, 17% from acetylene, 11% from aromatic chemistry and 2% from ethene and propene. CHOCHO is destroyed in the troposphere primarily by reaction with OH radicals (23%) and by photolysis (63%), but it is also removed from the atmosphere through wet (8%) and dry deposition (6%). Potential formation of secondary organic aerosol through CHOCHO losses on/in aerosols and clouds is neglected here due to the significant uncertainties associated with the underlying chemistry. The global annual mean CHOCHO burden and lifetime in the model domain are estimated to be 0.02 Tg (equal to the global burden seen by SCIAMACHY over land for the year 2005) and about 3 h, respectively. The model results are compared with satellite observations of CHOCHO columns. When accounting only for the secondary sources of CHOCHO in the model, the model underestimates CHOCHO columns observed by satellites. This is attributed to an overestimate of CHOCHO sinks or a missing global source of about 20 Tg y<sup>−1</sup>. Using the current primary emissions of CHOCHO from biomass burning together with the anthropogenic combustion sources of about 7 Tg y<sup>−1</sup> leads to an overestimate by the model over hot spot areas.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/4965/2008/acp-8-4965-2008.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT smyriokefalitakis theinfluenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT mvrekoussis theinfluenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT ktsigaridis theinfluenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT fwittrock theinfluenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT arichter theinfluenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT cbruhl theinfluenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT rvolkamer theinfluenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT jpburrows theinfluenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT mkanakidou theinfluenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT smyriokefalitakis influenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT mvrekoussis influenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT ktsigaridis influenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT fwittrock influenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT arichter influenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT cbruhl influenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT rvolkamer influenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT jpburrows influenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
AT mkanakidou influenceofnaturalandanthropogenicsecondarysourcesontheglyoxalglobaldistribution
_version_ 1725820873488728064