Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.

Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cecilia Forcato, Luz Bavassi, Gabriela De Pino, Rodrigo Sebastián Fernández, Mirta Fabiana Villarreal, María Eugenia Pedreira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4798722?pdf=render
id doaj-389eaefc938440c49269d1283acbe0a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-389eaefc938440c49269d1283acbe0a62020-11-25T02:14:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01113e015138110.1371/journal.pone.0151381Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.Cecilia ForcatoLuz BavassiGabriela De PinoRodrigo Sebastián FernándezMirta Fabiana VillarrealMaría Eugenia PedreiraConsolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation. We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4798722?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cecilia Forcato
Luz Bavassi
Gabriela De Pino
Rodrigo Sebastián Fernández
Mirta Fabiana Villarreal
María Eugenia Pedreira
spellingShingle Cecilia Forcato
Luz Bavassi
Gabriela De Pino
Rodrigo Sebastián Fernández
Mirta Fabiana Villarreal
María Eugenia Pedreira
Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Cecilia Forcato
Luz Bavassi
Gabriela De Pino
Rodrigo Sebastián Fernández
Mirta Fabiana Villarreal
María Eugenia Pedreira
author_sort Cecilia Forcato
title Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.
title_short Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.
title_full Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.
title_fullStr Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.
title_full_unstemmed Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.
title_sort differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: an fmri study of the reconsolidation process.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation. We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4798722?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ceciliaforcato differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT luzbavassi differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT gabrieladepino differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT rodrigosebastianfernandez differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT mirtafabianavillarreal differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT mariaeugeniapedreira differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
_version_ 1724901829655920640