Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.
Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do n...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4798722?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-389eaefc938440c49269d1283acbe0a6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-389eaefc938440c49269d1283acbe0a62020-11-25T02:14:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01113e015138110.1371/journal.pone.0151381Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process.Cecilia ForcatoLuz BavassiGabriela De PinoRodrigo Sebastián FernándezMirta Fabiana VillarrealMaría Eugenia PedreiraConsolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation. We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4798722?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cecilia Forcato Luz Bavassi Gabriela De Pino Rodrigo Sebastián Fernández Mirta Fabiana Villarreal María Eugenia Pedreira |
spellingShingle |
Cecilia Forcato Luz Bavassi Gabriela De Pino Rodrigo Sebastián Fernández Mirta Fabiana Villarreal María Eugenia Pedreira Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Cecilia Forcato Luz Bavassi Gabriela De Pino Rodrigo Sebastián Fernández Mirta Fabiana Villarreal María Eugenia Pedreira |
author_sort |
Cecilia Forcato |
title |
Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process. |
title_short |
Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process. |
title_full |
Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process. |
title_fullStr |
Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process. |
title_sort |
differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: an fmri study of the reconsolidation process. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation. We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4798722?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ceciliaforcato differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT luzbavassi differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT gabrieladepino differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT rodrigosebastianfernandez differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT mirtafabianavillarreal differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT mariaeugeniapedreira differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess |
_version_ |
1724901829655920640 |