Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers

Background Globally, radon is the leading risk factor for lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS). In this study, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the evidence of the risk of LCINS associated with residential radon exposure. Methods Medline and Embase databases were searched using predefine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elvin S. Cheng, Sam Egger, Suzanne Hughes, Marianne Weber, Julia Steinberg, Bayzidur Rahman, Heather Worth, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Patrick Rawstorne, Xue Qin Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Respiratory Society 2021-02-01
Series:European Respiratory Review
Online Access:http://err.ersjournals.com/content/30/159/200230.full
id doaj-388aaa1564f2457ebfcd316a015afe95
record_format Article
spelling doaj-388aaa1564f2457ebfcd316a015afe952021-03-31T12:29:30ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyEuropean Respiratory Review0905-91801600-06172021-02-013015910.1183/16000617.0230-20200230-2020Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokersElvin S. Cheng0Sam Egger1Suzanne Hughes2Marianne Weber3Julia Steinberg4Bayzidur Rahman5Heather Worth6Alberto Ruano-Ravina7Patrick Rawstorne8Xue Qin Yu9 Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Dept of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Background Globally, radon is the leading risk factor for lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS). In this study, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the evidence of the risk of LCINS associated with residential radon exposure. Methods Medline and Embase databases were searched using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify relevant studies published from 1 January 1990 to 5 March 2020 focused on never-smokers. We identified four pooled collaborative studies (incorporating data from 24 case–control studies), one case–control study and one cohort study for systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed on the results of the four pooled studies due to different measures of effect and outcome reported in the cohort study and insufficient information reported for the case–control study. In a post hoc analysis, the corresponding risk for ever-smokers was also examined. Results Risk estimates of lung cancer from residential radon exposure were pooled in the meta-analysis for 2341 never-smoker cases, 8967 never-smoker controls, 9937 ever-smoker cases and 12 463 ever-smoker controls. Adjusted excess relative risks (aERRs) per 100 Bq·m−3 of radon level were 0.15 (95% CI 0.06–0.25) for never-smokers and 0.09 (95% CI 0.03–0.16) for ever-smokers, and the difference between them was statistically insignificant (p=0.32). The aERR per 100 Bq·m−3was higher for men (0.46; 95% CI 0.15–0.76) than for women (0.09; 95% CI −0.02–0.20) among never-smokers (p=0.027). Conclusion This study provided quantified risk estimates for lung cancer from residential radon exposure among both never-smokers and ever-smokers. Among never-smokers in radon-prone areas, men were at higher risk of lung cancer than women.http://err.ersjournals.com/content/30/159/200230.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elvin S. Cheng
Sam Egger
Suzanne Hughes
Marianne Weber
Julia Steinberg
Bayzidur Rahman
Heather Worth
Alberto Ruano-Ravina
Patrick Rawstorne
Xue Qin Yu
spellingShingle Elvin S. Cheng
Sam Egger
Suzanne Hughes
Marianne Weber
Julia Steinberg
Bayzidur Rahman
Heather Worth
Alberto Ruano-Ravina
Patrick Rawstorne
Xue Qin Yu
Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers
European Respiratory Review
author_facet Elvin S. Cheng
Sam Egger
Suzanne Hughes
Marianne Weber
Julia Steinberg
Bayzidur Rahman
Heather Worth
Alberto Ruano-Ravina
Patrick Rawstorne
Xue Qin Yu
author_sort Elvin S. Cheng
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers
publisher European Respiratory Society
series European Respiratory Review
issn 0905-9180
1600-0617
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Background Globally, radon is the leading risk factor for lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS). In this study, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the evidence of the risk of LCINS associated with residential radon exposure. Methods Medline and Embase databases were searched using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify relevant studies published from 1 January 1990 to 5 March 2020 focused on never-smokers. We identified four pooled collaborative studies (incorporating data from 24 case–control studies), one case–control study and one cohort study for systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed on the results of the four pooled studies due to different measures of effect and outcome reported in the cohort study and insufficient information reported for the case–control study. In a post hoc analysis, the corresponding risk for ever-smokers was also examined. Results Risk estimates of lung cancer from residential radon exposure were pooled in the meta-analysis for 2341 never-smoker cases, 8967 never-smoker controls, 9937 ever-smoker cases and 12 463 ever-smoker controls. Adjusted excess relative risks (aERRs) per 100 Bq·m−3 of radon level were 0.15 (95% CI 0.06–0.25) for never-smokers and 0.09 (95% CI 0.03–0.16) for ever-smokers, and the difference between them was statistically insignificant (p=0.32). The aERR per 100 Bq·m−3was higher for men (0.46; 95% CI 0.15–0.76) than for women (0.09; 95% CI −0.02–0.20) among never-smokers (p=0.027). Conclusion This study provided quantified risk estimates for lung cancer from residential radon exposure among both never-smokers and ever-smokers. Among never-smokers in radon-prone areas, men were at higher risk of lung cancer than women.
url http://err.ersjournals.com/content/30/159/200230.full
work_keys_str_mv AT elvinscheng systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
AT samegger systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
AT suzannehughes systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
AT marianneweber systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
AT juliasteinberg systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
AT bayzidurrahman systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
AT heatherworth systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
AT albertoruanoravina systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
AT patrickrawstorne systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
AT xueqinyu systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers
_version_ 1724177523784286208