Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers
Background Globally, radon is the leading risk factor for lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS). In this study, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the evidence of the risk of LCINS associated with residential radon exposure. Methods Medline and Embase databases were searched using predefine...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
European Respiratory Society
2021-02-01
|
Series: | European Respiratory Review |
Online Access: | http://err.ersjournals.com/content/30/159/200230.full |
id |
doaj-388aaa1564f2457ebfcd316a015afe95 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-388aaa1564f2457ebfcd316a015afe952021-03-31T12:29:30ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyEuropean Respiratory Review0905-91801600-06172021-02-013015910.1183/16000617.0230-20200230-2020Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokersElvin S. Cheng0Sam Egger1Suzanne Hughes2Marianne Weber3Julia Steinberg4Bayzidur Rahman5Heather Worth6Alberto Ruano-Ravina7Patrick Rawstorne8Xue Qin Yu9 Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Dept of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia Background Globally, radon is the leading risk factor for lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS). In this study, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the evidence of the risk of LCINS associated with residential radon exposure. Methods Medline and Embase databases were searched using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify relevant studies published from 1 January 1990 to 5 March 2020 focused on never-smokers. We identified four pooled collaborative studies (incorporating data from 24 case–control studies), one case–control study and one cohort study for systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed on the results of the four pooled studies due to different measures of effect and outcome reported in the cohort study and insufficient information reported for the case–control study. In a post hoc analysis, the corresponding risk for ever-smokers was also examined. Results Risk estimates of lung cancer from residential radon exposure were pooled in the meta-analysis for 2341 never-smoker cases, 8967 never-smoker controls, 9937 ever-smoker cases and 12 463 ever-smoker controls. Adjusted excess relative risks (aERRs) per 100 Bq·m−3 of radon level were 0.15 (95% CI 0.06–0.25) for never-smokers and 0.09 (95% CI 0.03–0.16) for ever-smokers, and the difference between them was statistically insignificant (p=0.32). The aERR per 100 Bq·m−3was higher for men (0.46; 95% CI 0.15–0.76) than for women (0.09; 95% CI −0.02–0.20) among never-smokers (p=0.027). Conclusion This study provided quantified risk estimates for lung cancer from residential radon exposure among both never-smokers and ever-smokers. Among never-smokers in radon-prone areas, men were at higher risk of lung cancer than women.http://err.ersjournals.com/content/30/159/200230.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elvin S. Cheng Sam Egger Suzanne Hughes Marianne Weber Julia Steinberg Bayzidur Rahman Heather Worth Alberto Ruano-Ravina Patrick Rawstorne Xue Qin Yu |
spellingShingle |
Elvin S. Cheng Sam Egger Suzanne Hughes Marianne Weber Julia Steinberg Bayzidur Rahman Heather Worth Alberto Ruano-Ravina Patrick Rawstorne Xue Qin Yu Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers European Respiratory Review |
author_facet |
Elvin S. Cheng Sam Egger Suzanne Hughes Marianne Weber Julia Steinberg Bayzidur Rahman Heather Worth Alberto Ruano-Ravina Patrick Rawstorne Xue Qin Yu |
author_sort |
Elvin S. Cheng |
title |
Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers |
title_short |
Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers |
title_full |
Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers |
title_fullStr |
Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers |
title_sort |
systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers |
publisher |
European Respiratory Society |
series |
European Respiratory Review |
issn |
0905-9180 1600-0617 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Background
Globally, radon is the leading risk factor for lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS). In this study, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the evidence of the risk of LCINS associated with residential radon exposure.
Methods
Medline and Embase databases were searched using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify relevant studies published from 1 January 1990 to 5 March 2020 focused on never-smokers. We identified four pooled collaborative studies (incorporating data from 24 case–control studies), one case–control study and one cohort study for systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed on the results of the four pooled studies due to different measures of effect and outcome reported in the cohort study and insufficient information reported for the case–control study. In a post hoc analysis, the corresponding risk for ever-smokers was also examined.
Results
Risk estimates of lung cancer from residential radon exposure were pooled in the meta-analysis for 2341 never-smoker cases, 8967 never-smoker controls, 9937 ever-smoker cases and 12 463 ever-smoker controls. Adjusted excess relative risks (aERRs) per 100 Bq·m−3 of radon level were 0.15 (95% CI 0.06–0.25) for never-smokers and 0.09 (95% CI 0.03–0.16) for ever-smokers, and the difference between them was statistically insignificant (p=0.32). The aERR per 100 Bq·m−3was higher for men (0.46; 95% CI 0.15–0.76) than for women (0.09; 95% CI −0.02–0.20) among never-smokers (p=0.027).
Conclusion
This study provided quantified risk estimates for lung cancer from residential radon exposure among both never-smokers and ever-smokers. Among never-smokers in radon-prone areas, men were at higher risk of lung cancer than women. |
url |
http://err.ersjournals.com/content/30/159/200230.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elvinscheng systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers AT samegger systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers AT suzannehughes systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers AT marianneweber systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers AT juliasteinberg systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers AT bayzidurrahman systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers AT heatherworth systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers AT albertoruanoravina systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers AT patrickrawstorne systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers AT xueqinyu systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofresidentialradonandlungcancerinneversmokers |
_version_ |
1724177523784286208 |