Recovery patterns and physics of the network.

In a progressively interconnected world, the loss of system resilience has consequences for human health, the economy, and the environment. Research has exploited the science of networks to explain the resilience of complex systems against random attacks, malicious attacks, and the localized attacks...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alireza Ermagun, Nazanin Tajik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245396
id doaj-3880ccb24e0e46f5a1000124cd27dabd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3880ccb24e0e46f5a1000124cd27dabd2021-06-16T04:31:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01161e024539610.1371/journal.pone.0245396Recovery patterns and physics of the network.Alireza ErmagunNazanin TajikIn a progressively interconnected world, the loss of system resilience has consequences for human health, the economy, and the environment. Research has exploited the science of networks to explain the resilience of complex systems against random attacks, malicious attacks, and the localized attacks induced by natural disasters or mass attacks. Little is known about the elucidation of system recovery by the network topology. This study adds to the knowledge of network resilience by examining the nexus of recoverability and network topology. We establish a new paradigm for identifying the recovery behavior of networks and introduce the recoverability measure. Results indicate that the recovery response behavior and the recoverability measure are the function of both size and topology of networks. In small sized networks, the return to recovery exhibits homogeneous recovery behavior over topology, while the return shape is dispersed with an increase in the size of network. A network becomes more recoverable as connectivity measures of the network increase, and less recoverable as accessibility measures of network increase. Overall, the results not only offer guidance on designing recoverable networks, but also depict the recovery nature of networks deliberately following a disruption. Our recovery behavior and recoverability measure has been tested on 16 distinct network topologies. The relevant recovery behavior can be generalized based on our definition for any network topology recovering deliberately.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245396
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alireza Ermagun
Nazanin Tajik
spellingShingle Alireza Ermagun
Nazanin Tajik
Recovery patterns and physics of the network.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Alireza Ermagun
Nazanin Tajik
author_sort Alireza Ermagun
title Recovery patterns and physics of the network.
title_short Recovery patterns and physics of the network.
title_full Recovery patterns and physics of the network.
title_fullStr Recovery patterns and physics of the network.
title_full_unstemmed Recovery patterns and physics of the network.
title_sort recovery patterns and physics of the network.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description In a progressively interconnected world, the loss of system resilience has consequences for human health, the economy, and the environment. Research has exploited the science of networks to explain the resilience of complex systems against random attacks, malicious attacks, and the localized attacks induced by natural disasters or mass attacks. Little is known about the elucidation of system recovery by the network topology. This study adds to the knowledge of network resilience by examining the nexus of recoverability and network topology. We establish a new paradigm for identifying the recovery behavior of networks and introduce the recoverability measure. Results indicate that the recovery response behavior and the recoverability measure are the function of both size and topology of networks. In small sized networks, the return to recovery exhibits homogeneous recovery behavior over topology, while the return shape is dispersed with an increase in the size of network. A network becomes more recoverable as connectivity measures of the network increase, and less recoverable as accessibility measures of network increase. Overall, the results not only offer guidance on designing recoverable networks, but also depict the recovery nature of networks deliberately following a disruption. Our recovery behavior and recoverability measure has been tested on 16 distinct network topologies. The relevant recovery behavior can be generalized based on our definition for any network topology recovering deliberately.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245396
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezaermagun recoverypatternsandphysicsofthenetwork
AT nazanintajik recoverypatternsandphysicsofthenetwork
_version_ 1721375592599781376