Testing Pollination Syndromes in <i>Oenothera</i> (Onagraceae)

Pollinators are considered a major selective force in shaping the diversification of angiosperms. It has been hypothesized that convergent evolution of floral form has resulted in “pollination syndromes” - i.e. suites of floral traits that correspond to attraction of particular pollinator functional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyra N. Krakos, Matthew W. Austin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Enviroquest Ltd. 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Pollination Ecology
Online Access:https://pollinationecology.org/index.php/jpe/article/view/609
id doaj-387bf7ef149243b6acd96891d08fed77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-387bf7ef149243b6acd96891d08fed772021-07-28T12:30:21ZengEnviroquest Ltd.Journal of Pollination Ecology1920-76032021-01-012610.26786/1920-7603(2020)609373Testing Pollination Syndromes in <i>Oenothera</i> (Onagraceae)Kyra N. Krakos0Matthew W. Austin1Maryville UniversityUniversity of Missouri - Saint Louis, Dept BiologyPollinators are considered a major selective force in shaping the diversification of angiosperms. It has been hypothesized that convergent evolution of floral form has resulted in “pollination syndromes” - i.e. suites of floral traits that correspond to attraction of particular pollinator functional groups. Across the literature, the pollination syndrome concept has received mixed support. This may be due to studies using different methods to describe floral traits and/or the pollination syndrome concept being supported more often in species highly reliant on pollinators for reproduction. Here, we assess the predictive ability of pollination syndromes in Oenothera, a species rich clade with pollination systems existing on a gradient of specialization, and in which species are either self-compatible or self-incompatible. We ask the following questions: Do Oenothera species follow the pollination syndrome concept using traditional, categorical floral trait descriptions and/or quantitative floral trait measurements? And, are floral traits more predictive of primary pollinators in species with specialized pollination systems and/or species that are self-incompatible? Mapping floral traits of 54 Oenothera species into morphospace, we do not find support for the pollination syndrome concept using either categorical or quantitative floral trait descriptions. We do not find support for specialization or breeding system influencing the prediction of primary pollinators. However, we find pollination syndromes were more predictive in Oenothera species with moth pollination systems. Collectively, these results suggest that the pollination syndrome concept cannot be generally applied across taxa and that evolutionary history is important to consider when evaluating the relationship between floral form and contemporary pollinators.https://pollinationecology.org/index.php/jpe/article/view/609
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kyra N. Krakos
Matthew W. Austin
spellingShingle Kyra N. Krakos
Matthew W. Austin
Testing Pollination Syndromes in <i>Oenothera</i> (Onagraceae)
Journal of Pollination Ecology
author_facet Kyra N. Krakos
Matthew W. Austin
author_sort Kyra N. Krakos
title Testing Pollination Syndromes in <i>Oenothera</i> (Onagraceae)
title_short Testing Pollination Syndromes in <i>Oenothera</i> (Onagraceae)
title_full Testing Pollination Syndromes in <i>Oenothera</i> (Onagraceae)
title_fullStr Testing Pollination Syndromes in <i>Oenothera</i> (Onagraceae)
title_full_unstemmed Testing Pollination Syndromes in <i>Oenothera</i> (Onagraceae)
title_sort testing pollination syndromes in <i>oenothera</i> (onagraceae)
publisher Enviroquest Ltd.
series Journal of Pollination Ecology
issn 1920-7603
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Pollinators are considered a major selective force in shaping the diversification of angiosperms. It has been hypothesized that convergent evolution of floral form has resulted in “pollination syndromes” - i.e. suites of floral traits that correspond to attraction of particular pollinator functional groups. Across the literature, the pollination syndrome concept has received mixed support. This may be due to studies using different methods to describe floral traits and/or the pollination syndrome concept being supported more often in species highly reliant on pollinators for reproduction. Here, we assess the predictive ability of pollination syndromes in Oenothera, a species rich clade with pollination systems existing on a gradient of specialization, and in which species are either self-compatible or self-incompatible. We ask the following questions: Do Oenothera species follow the pollination syndrome concept using traditional, categorical floral trait descriptions and/or quantitative floral trait measurements? And, are floral traits more predictive of primary pollinators in species with specialized pollination systems and/or species that are self-incompatible? Mapping floral traits of 54 Oenothera species into morphospace, we do not find support for the pollination syndrome concept using either categorical or quantitative floral trait descriptions. We do not find support for specialization or breeding system influencing the prediction of primary pollinators. However, we find pollination syndromes were more predictive in Oenothera species with moth pollination systems. Collectively, these results suggest that the pollination syndrome concept cannot be generally applied across taxa and that evolutionary history is important to consider when evaluating the relationship between floral form and contemporary pollinators.
url https://pollinationecology.org/index.php/jpe/article/view/609
work_keys_str_mv AT kyrankrakos testingpollinationsyndromesinioenotheraionagraceae
AT matthewwaustin testingpollinationsyndromesinioenotheraionagraceae
_version_ 1721278537559703552