A Cognitive Framework for Analysis and Treatment of Uncertainty in Prognostics

Uncertainties exist in fault prognostics systems can lead to inaccurate results and this will lead to unnecessary or delay maintenance activities. The uncertainty must be considered carefully to achieve more effective engineering applications. Uncertainties have been classified as aleatory uncertain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Sun, T. Liu, S. Liu, Q. Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2013-07-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6239
id doaj-38707a025efe44b98c6eed1667ee1638
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38707a025efe44b98c6eed1667ee16382021-02-21T21:08:50ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162013-07-013310.3303/CET1333032A Cognitive Framework for Analysis and Treatment of Uncertainty in PrognosticsB. SunT. LiuS. LiuQ. FengUncertainties exist in fault prognostics systems can lead to inaccurate results and this will lead to unnecessary or delay maintenance activities. The uncertainty must be considered carefully to achieve more effective engineering applications. Uncertainties have been classified as aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty. Aleatory uncertainty is also called objective uncertainty, irreducible uncertainty, inherent uncertainty, and stochastic uncertainty. Epistemic uncertainty is also referred to as subjective uncertainty, reducible uncertainty and state-of-knowledge uncertainty. A cognitive framework to aid in the understanding of uncertainties and techniques for mitigating and even taking positive advantage of them is presented. From the perspective of man-machine-environment system engineering, the framework is an attempt to clarify the wide range of uncertainties that affect prognostics system. The uncertainty sources are identified as three aspects (machine, environment, man). A general uncertainty management procedure is proposed. It mainly contains uncertainty identification, qualification, propagation and sensitivity analysis. For case illustration purpose, the popular data-driven prognostics methods are discussed in detail. Current and developing methods for dealing with uncertainties are projected onto the framework to understand their relative roles and interactions.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6239
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. Sun
T. Liu
S. Liu
Q. Feng
spellingShingle B. Sun
T. Liu
S. Liu
Q. Feng
A Cognitive Framework for Analysis and Treatment of Uncertainty in Prognostics
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet B. Sun
T. Liu
S. Liu
Q. Feng
author_sort B. Sun
title A Cognitive Framework for Analysis and Treatment of Uncertainty in Prognostics
title_short A Cognitive Framework for Analysis and Treatment of Uncertainty in Prognostics
title_full A Cognitive Framework for Analysis and Treatment of Uncertainty in Prognostics
title_fullStr A Cognitive Framework for Analysis and Treatment of Uncertainty in Prognostics
title_full_unstemmed A Cognitive Framework for Analysis and Treatment of Uncertainty in Prognostics
title_sort cognitive framework for analysis and treatment of uncertainty in prognostics
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2013-07-01
description Uncertainties exist in fault prognostics systems can lead to inaccurate results and this will lead to unnecessary or delay maintenance activities. The uncertainty must be considered carefully to achieve more effective engineering applications. Uncertainties have been classified as aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty. Aleatory uncertainty is also called objective uncertainty, irreducible uncertainty, inherent uncertainty, and stochastic uncertainty. Epistemic uncertainty is also referred to as subjective uncertainty, reducible uncertainty and state-of-knowledge uncertainty. A cognitive framework to aid in the understanding of uncertainties and techniques for mitigating and even taking positive advantage of them is presented. From the perspective of man-machine-environment system engineering, the framework is an attempt to clarify the wide range of uncertainties that affect prognostics system. The uncertainty sources are identified as three aspects (machine, environment, man). A general uncertainty management procedure is proposed. It mainly contains uncertainty identification, qualification, propagation and sensitivity analysis. For case illustration purpose, the popular data-driven prognostics methods are discussed in detail. Current and developing methods for dealing with uncertainties are projected onto the framework to understand their relative roles and interactions.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6239
work_keys_str_mv AT bsun acognitiveframeworkforanalysisandtreatmentofuncertaintyinprognostics
AT tliu acognitiveframeworkforanalysisandtreatmentofuncertaintyinprognostics
AT sliu acognitiveframeworkforanalysisandtreatmentofuncertaintyinprognostics
AT qfeng acognitiveframeworkforanalysisandtreatmentofuncertaintyinprognostics
AT bsun cognitiveframeworkforanalysisandtreatmentofuncertaintyinprognostics
AT tliu cognitiveframeworkforanalysisandtreatmentofuncertaintyinprognostics
AT sliu cognitiveframeworkforanalysisandtreatmentofuncertaintyinprognostics
AT qfeng cognitiveframeworkforanalysisandtreatmentofuncertaintyinprognostics
_version_ 1724257338774257664