A Dynamic Methodology for Setting Up Inspection Time Intervals in Conditional Preventive Maintenance

In periodic condition monitoring, the main problem lies in determining the inspection time intervals. This paper presents a new method for setting an optimum calendar to inspect a critical component that fails due to wear and tear as described by a Weibull probability function. By considering a set...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Assis, Pedro Carmona Marques
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8715
id doaj-3869655c44c545319a93da1e5da7f059
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3869655c44c545319a93da1e5da7f0592021-09-25T23:42:12ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-09-01118715871510.3390/app11188715A Dynamic Methodology for Setting Up Inspection Time Intervals in Conditional Preventive MaintenanceRui Assis0Pedro Carmona Marques1EIGeS—Research Centre in Industrial Engineering, Management and Sustainability, Lusófona University, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisbon, PortugalEIGeS—Research Centre in Industrial Engineering, Management and Sustainability, Lusófona University, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisbon, PortugalIn periodic condition monitoring, the main problem lies in determining the inspection time intervals. This paper presents a new method for setting an optimum calendar to inspect a critical component that fails due to wear and tear as described by a Weibull probability function. By considering a set of inspection intervals, such that reliability between every two inspections is kept equal or below a pre-set threshold while keeping the total costs of inspection, degraded production, consequences of failure, and repair to a minimum. The resulting calendar may be adjusted dynamically over time as inspections take place and test results are found to be negative, by considering the inspector’s confidence in the test and the likelihood of the method’s yielding false negatives. Consequently, the method becomes self-adjustable as it returns a new calendar after the observations of each test are known and properly interpreted. There are several studies that deal with this issue, but none addresses the concept of safe and unsafe time windows which results from merging two other concepts: descendant inspection time intervals and the time delay between a potential failure and a functional failure (the P–F period).https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8715conditional maintenanceinspection intervalsreliabilityP–F curve
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rui Assis
Pedro Carmona Marques
spellingShingle Rui Assis
Pedro Carmona Marques
A Dynamic Methodology for Setting Up Inspection Time Intervals in Conditional Preventive Maintenance
Applied Sciences
conditional maintenance
inspection intervals
reliability
P–F curve
author_facet Rui Assis
Pedro Carmona Marques
author_sort Rui Assis
title A Dynamic Methodology for Setting Up Inspection Time Intervals in Conditional Preventive Maintenance
title_short A Dynamic Methodology for Setting Up Inspection Time Intervals in Conditional Preventive Maintenance
title_full A Dynamic Methodology for Setting Up Inspection Time Intervals in Conditional Preventive Maintenance
title_fullStr A Dynamic Methodology for Setting Up Inspection Time Intervals in Conditional Preventive Maintenance
title_full_unstemmed A Dynamic Methodology for Setting Up Inspection Time Intervals in Conditional Preventive Maintenance
title_sort dynamic methodology for setting up inspection time intervals in conditional preventive maintenance
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2021-09-01
description In periodic condition monitoring, the main problem lies in determining the inspection time intervals. This paper presents a new method for setting an optimum calendar to inspect a critical component that fails due to wear and tear as described by a Weibull probability function. By considering a set of inspection intervals, such that reliability between every two inspections is kept equal or below a pre-set threshold while keeping the total costs of inspection, degraded production, consequences of failure, and repair to a minimum. The resulting calendar may be adjusted dynamically over time as inspections take place and test results are found to be negative, by considering the inspector’s confidence in the test and the likelihood of the method’s yielding false negatives. Consequently, the method becomes self-adjustable as it returns a new calendar after the observations of each test are known and properly interpreted. There are several studies that deal with this issue, but none addresses the concept of safe and unsafe time windows which results from merging two other concepts: descendant inspection time intervals and the time delay between a potential failure and a functional failure (the P–F period).
topic conditional maintenance
inspection intervals
reliability
P–F curve
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8715
work_keys_str_mv AT ruiassis adynamicmethodologyforsettingupinspectiontimeintervalsinconditionalpreventivemaintenance
AT pedrocarmonamarques adynamicmethodologyforsettingupinspectiontimeintervalsinconditionalpreventivemaintenance
AT ruiassis dynamicmethodologyforsettingupinspectiontimeintervalsinconditionalpreventivemaintenance
AT pedrocarmonamarques dynamicmethodologyforsettingupinspectiontimeintervalsinconditionalpreventivemaintenance
_version_ 1717368175618686976