PARODOXES OF THE SELF-DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM OF LAW: SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM

The notions of systemic corruption of the law and of judicial activism, worked in Brazil, especially by Marcelo Neves, Lenio Luiz Streck and others, constitute a form of distinction that hides a paradox. In this tuning fork, the form of a second-order observation made from the Luhmann systemic pragm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafael Lazzarotto Simioni, João Paulo Salles Pinto
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria 2019-05-01
Series:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/30746
id doaj-3858a88c313342fa93e616ba3a27c6d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3858a88c313342fa93e616ba3a27c6d22020-11-25T03:30:59ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaRevista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM1981-36941981-36942019-05-01142e30746e3074610.5902/198136943074616480PARODOXES OF THE SELF-DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM OF LAW: SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISMRafael Lazzarotto Simioni0João Paulo Salles Pinto1FACULDADE DE DIREITO DO SUL DE MINAS-FDSMFACULDADE DE DIREITO DO SUL DE MINAS- FDSMThe notions of systemic corruption of the law and of judicial activism, worked in Brazil, especially by Marcelo Neves, Lenio Luiz Streck and others, constitute a form of distinction that hides a paradox. In this tuning fork, the form of a second-order observation made from the Luhmann systemic pragmatic method allows a conception of these concepts in a different way. In order to verify, at the level of second-order observation, the form, the function and the paradox that such a research is based on the theory of autopoietic social systems of Niklas Luhmann. concepts in Brazilian legal communication. In this sense, the present work deals with the problem of whether it is possible to make explicit that the theoretical constructions of systemic corruption and judicial activism would be linked to a self-describing relational realization of the legal system. Thus, the research concludes that such concepts are a possible reflection of the legal system at the level of its contemporary self-description.https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/30746ativismo judicialautodescriçãocorrupção sistêmicaparadoxoteoria dos sistemas.
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rafael Lazzarotto Simioni
João Paulo Salles Pinto
spellingShingle Rafael Lazzarotto Simioni
João Paulo Salles Pinto
PARODOXES OF THE SELF-DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM OF LAW: SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
ativismo judicial
autodescrição
corrupção sistêmica
paradoxo
teoria dos sistemas.
author_facet Rafael Lazzarotto Simioni
João Paulo Salles Pinto
author_sort Rafael Lazzarotto Simioni
title PARODOXES OF THE SELF-DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM OF LAW: SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
title_short PARODOXES OF THE SELF-DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM OF LAW: SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
title_full PARODOXES OF THE SELF-DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM OF LAW: SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
title_fullStr PARODOXES OF THE SELF-DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM OF LAW: SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
title_full_unstemmed PARODOXES OF THE SELF-DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM OF LAW: SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
title_sort parodoxes of the self-description of the system of law: systemic corruption and judicial activism
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
series Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
issn 1981-3694
1981-3694
publishDate 2019-05-01
description The notions of systemic corruption of the law and of judicial activism, worked in Brazil, especially by Marcelo Neves, Lenio Luiz Streck and others, constitute a form of distinction that hides a paradox. In this tuning fork, the form of a second-order observation made from the Luhmann systemic pragmatic method allows a conception of these concepts in a different way. In order to verify, at the level of second-order observation, the form, the function and the paradox that such a research is based on the theory of autopoietic social systems of Niklas Luhmann. concepts in Brazilian legal communication. In this sense, the present work deals with the problem of whether it is possible to make explicit that the theoretical constructions of systemic corruption and judicial activism would be linked to a self-describing relational realization of the legal system. Thus, the research concludes that such concepts are a possible reflection of the legal system at the level of its contemporary self-description.
topic ativismo judicial
autodescrição
corrupção sistêmica
paradoxo
teoria dos sistemas.
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/30746
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaellazzarottosimioni parodoxesoftheselfdescriptionofthesystemoflawsystemiccorruptionandjudicialactivism
AT joaopaulosallespinto parodoxesoftheselfdescriptionofthesystemoflawsystemiccorruptionandjudicialactivism
_version_ 1724574448704552960