Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
Aim Whole‐body computed tomography (CT) for trauma occasionally reveals significant incidental findings not related to trauma, which require an adequate response. In this study, we examined the current state of incidental findings in trauma patients on whole‐body CT and the effects of the feedback s...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Acute Medicine & Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.410 |
id |
doaj-38508d11436b48ee99b5694d2ceee890 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-38508d11436b48ee99b5694d2ceee8902021-05-02T08:42:56ZengWileyAcute Medicine & Surgery2052-88172019-07-016327427810.1002/ams2.410Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback systemKeisuke Kumada0Nobuo Murakami1Hideshi Okada2Izumi Toyoda3Shinji Ogura4Takahiko Asano5Patient Safety Division Gifu University Hospital Gifu JapanPatient Safety Division Gifu University Hospital Gifu JapanDepartment of Emergency & Disaster Medicine Gifu University School of Medicine Gifu JapanDepartment of Emergency & Disaster Medicine Gifu University School of Medicine Gifu JapanDepartment of Emergency & Disaster Medicine Gifu University School of Medicine Gifu JapanDepartment of Radiology Gifu University School of Medicine Gifu JapanAim Whole‐body computed tomography (CT) for trauma occasionally reveals significant incidental findings not related to trauma, which require an adequate response. In this study, we examined the current state of incidental findings in trauma patients on whole‐body CT and the effects of the feedback system. Methods The subject sample included trauma patients who underwent whole‐body CT while being examined for trauma during the 2‐year period, with the interpretation of the CT reported by a radiologist. The frequency and recognition of incidental findings and the involved body region were investigated. The state of incidental findings before and after implementation of a radiography report feedback system was also examined. Results During the study period, whole‐body CT revealed incidental findings in 79 of 199 trauma patients (40.1%). The mean age of the 79 patients with incidental findings was 62.8 ± 19.5 years, and the mean injury severity score was 16.6 ± 10.0. No difference was observed in the severity of trauma, age, or length of hospital stay. The incidental findings were related to the liver/gallbladder in 22 patients, kidneys in 17, lungs in 14, and the intracranial area in 13. The recognition rate of incidental findings after the implementation of the feedback system increased from 23.3% to 32.6%. Conclusions Considering that not all incidental findings are accurately recognized, a proper feedback system is required. A feedback system is beneficial and a need to ensure improvement in the recognition of incidental findings.https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.410CT scanfeedback systemincidental findingtrauma |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Keisuke Kumada Nobuo Murakami Hideshi Okada Izumi Toyoda Shinji Ogura Takahiko Asano |
spellingShingle |
Keisuke Kumada Nobuo Murakami Hideshi Okada Izumi Toyoda Shinji Ogura Takahiko Asano Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system Acute Medicine & Surgery CT scan feedback system incidental finding trauma |
author_facet |
Keisuke Kumada Nobuo Murakami Hideshi Okada Izumi Toyoda Shinji Ogura Takahiko Asano |
author_sort |
Keisuke Kumada |
title |
Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system |
title_short |
Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system |
title_full |
Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system |
title_fullStr |
Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system |
title_sort |
incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Acute Medicine & Surgery |
issn |
2052-8817 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Aim Whole‐body computed tomography (CT) for trauma occasionally reveals significant incidental findings not related to trauma, which require an adequate response. In this study, we examined the current state of incidental findings in trauma patients on whole‐body CT and the effects of the feedback system. Methods The subject sample included trauma patients who underwent whole‐body CT while being examined for trauma during the 2‐year period, with the interpretation of the CT reported by a radiologist. The frequency and recognition of incidental findings and the involved body region were investigated. The state of incidental findings before and after implementation of a radiography report feedback system was also examined. Results During the study period, whole‐body CT revealed incidental findings in 79 of 199 trauma patients (40.1%). The mean age of the 79 patients with incidental findings was 62.8 ± 19.5 years, and the mean injury severity score was 16.6 ± 10.0. No difference was observed in the severity of trauma, age, or length of hospital stay. The incidental findings were related to the liver/gallbladder in 22 patients, kidneys in 17, lungs in 14, and the intracranial area in 13. The recognition rate of incidental findings after the implementation of the feedback system increased from 23.3% to 32.6%. Conclusions Considering that not all incidental findings are accurately recognized, a proper feedback system is required. A feedback system is beneficial and a need to ensure improvement in the recognition of incidental findings. |
topic |
CT scan feedback system incidental finding trauma |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.410 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT keisukekumada incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem AT nobuomurakami incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem AT hideshiokada incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem AT izumitoyoda incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem AT shinjiogura incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem AT takahikoasano incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem |
_version_ |
1721493571295510528 |