Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system

Aim Whole‐body computed tomography (CT) for trauma occasionally reveals significant incidental findings not related to trauma, which require an adequate response. In this study, we examined the current state of incidental findings in trauma patients on whole‐body CT and the effects of the feedback s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keisuke Kumada, Nobuo Murakami, Hideshi Okada, Izumi Toyoda, Shinji Ogura, Takahiko Asano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-07-01
Series:Acute Medicine & Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.410
id doaj-38508d11436b48ee99b5694d2ceee890
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38508d11436b48ee99b5694d2ceee8902021-05-02T08:42:56ZengWileyAcute Medicine & Surgery2052-88172019-07-016327427810.1002/ams2.410Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback systemKeisuke Kumada0Nobuo Murakami1Hideshi Okada2Izumi Toyoda3Shinji Ogura4Takahiko Asano5Patient Safety Division Gifu University Hospital Gifu JapanPatient Safety Division Gifu University Hospital Gifu JapanDepartment of Emergency & Disaster Medicine Gifu University School of Medicine Gifu JapanDepartment of Emergency & Disaster Medicine Gifu University School of Medicine Gifu JapanDepartment of Emergency & Disaster Medicine Gifu University School of Medicine Gifu JapanDepartment of Radiology Gifu University School of Medicine Gifu JapanAim Whole‐body computed tomography (CT) for trauma occasionally reveals significant incidental findings not related to trauma, which require an adequate response. In this study, we examined the current state of incidental findings in trauma patients on whole‐body CT and the effects of the feedback system. Methods The subject sample included trauma patients who underwent whole‐body CT while being examined for trauma during the 2‐year period, with the interpretation of the CT reported by a radiologist. The frequency and recognition of incidental findings and the involved body region were investigated. The state of incidental findings before and after implementation of a radiography report feedback system was also examined. Results During the study period, whole‐body CT revealed incidental findings in 79 of 199 trauma patients (40.1%). The mean age of the 79 patients with incidental findings was 62.8 ± 19.5 years, and the mean injury severity score was 16.6 ± 10.0. No difference was observed in the severity of trauma, age, or length of hospital stay. The incidental findings were related to the liver/gallbladder in 22 patients, kidneys in 17, lungs in 14, and the intracranial area in 13. The recognition rate of incidental findings after the implementation of the feedback system increased from 23.3% to 32.6%. Conclusions Considering that not all incidental findings are accurately recognized, a proper feedback system is required. A feedback system is beneficial and a need to ensure improvement in the recognition of incidental findings.https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.410CT scanfeedback systemincidental findingtrauma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keisuke Kumada
Nobuo Murakami
Hideshi Okada
Izumi Toyoda
Shinji Ogura
Takahiko Asano
spellingShingle Keisuke Kumada
Nobuo Murakami
Hideshi Okada
Izumi Toyoda
Shinji Ogura
Takahiko Asano
Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
Acute Medicine & Surgery
CT scan
feedback system
incidental finding
trauma
author_facet Keisuke Kumada
Nobuo Murakami
Hideshi Okada
Izumi Toyoda
Shinji Ogura
Takahiko Asano
author_sort Keisuke Kumada
title Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_short Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_full Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_fullStr Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_full_unstemmed Incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
title_sort incidental findings on whole‐body computed tomography in trauma patients: the current state of incidental findings and the effect of implementation of a feedback system
publisher Wiley
series Acute Medicine & Surgery
issn 2052-8817
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Aim Whole‐body computed tomography (CT) for trauma occasionally reveals significant incidental findings not related to trauma, which require an adequate response. In this study, we examined the current state of incidental findings in trauma patients on whole‐body CT and the effects of the feedback system. Methods The subject sample included trauma patients who underwent whole‐body CT while being examined for trauma during the 2‐year period, with the interpretation of the CT reported by a radiologist. The frequency and recognition of incidental findings and the involved body region were investigated. The state of incidental findings before and after implementation of a radiography report feedback system was also examined. Results During the study period, whole‐body CT revealed incidental findings in 79 of 199 trauma patients (40.1%). The mean age of the 79 patients with incidental findings was 62.8 ± 19.5 years, and the mean injury severity score was 16.6 ± 10.0. No difference was observed in the severity of trauma, age, or length of hospital stay. The incidental findings were related to the liver/gallbladder in 22 patients, kidneys in 17, lungs in 14, and the intracranial area in 13. The recognition rate of incidental findings after the implementation of the feedback system increased from 23.3% to 32.6%. Conclusions Considering that not all incidental findings are accurately recognized, a proper feedback system is required. A feedback system is beneficial and a need to ensure improvement in the recognition of incidental findings.
topic CT scan
feedback system
incidental finding
trauma
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.410
work_keys_str_mv AT keisukekumada incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT nobuomurakami incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT hideshiokada incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT izumitoyoda incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT shinjiogura incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
AT takahikoasano incidentalfindingsonwholebodycomputedtomographyintraumapatientsthecurrentstateofincidentalfindingsandtheeffectofimplementationofafeedbacksystem
_version_ 1721493571295510528