Normality in Analytical Psychology
Although C.G. Jung’s interest in normality wavered throughout his career, it was one of the areas he identified in later life as worthy of further research. He began his career using a definition of normality which would have been the target of Foucault’s criticism, had Foucault chosen to review Jun...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2013-11-01
|
Series: | Behavioral Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/3/4/647 |
id |
doaj-38499db69f684cc8b95fa99de2b784ee |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-38499db69f684cc8b95fa99de2b784ee2020-11-24T22:43:11ZengMDPI AGBehavioral Sciences2076-328X2013-11-013464766110.3390/bs3040647bs3040647Normality in Analytical PsychologySteve Myers0Centre for Psychoanalytic Studies, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UKAlthough C.G. Jung’s interest in normality wavered throughout his career, it was one of the areas he identified in later life as worthy of further research. He began his career using a definition of normality which would have been the target of Foucault’s criticism, had Foucault chosen to review Jung’s work. However, Jung then evolved his thinking to a standpoint that was more aligned to Foucault’s own. Thereafter, the post Jungian concept of normality has remained relatively undeveloped by comparison with psychoanalysis and mainstream psychology. Jung’s disjecta membra on the subject suggest that, in contemporary analytical psychology, too much focus is placed on the process of individuation to the neglect of applications that consider collective processes. Also, there is potential for useful research and development into the nature of conflict between individuals and societies, and how normal people typically develop in relation to the spectrum between individuation and collectivity.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/3/4/647Junganalytical psychologynormalityindividuationcollectivityFoucaultFreud |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Steve Myers |
spellingShingle |
Steve Myers Normality in Analytical Psychology Behavioral Sciences Jung analytical psychology normality individuation collectivity Foucault Freud |
author_facet |
Steve Myers |
author_sort |
Steve Myers |
title |
Normality in Analytical Psychology |
title_short |
Normality in Analytical Psychology |
title_full |
Normality in Analytical Psychology |
title_fullStr |
Normality in Analytical Psychology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Normality in Analytical Psychology |
title_sort |
normality in analytical psychology |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Behavioral Sciences |
issn |
2076-328X |
publishDate |
2013-11-01 |
description |
Although C.G. Jung’s interest in normality wavered throughout his career, it was one of the areas he identified in later life as worthy of further research. He began his career using a definition of normality which would have been the target of Foucault’s criticism, had Foucault chosen to review Jung’s work. However, Jung then evolved his thinking to a standpoint that was more aligned to Foucault’s own. Thereafter, the post Jungian concept of normality has remained relatively undeveloped by comparison with psychoanalysis and mainstream psychology. Jung’s disjecta membra on the subject suggest that, in contemporary analytical psychology, too much focus is placed on the process of individuation to the neglect of applications that consider collective processes. Also, there is potential for useful research and development into the nature of conflict between individuals and societies, and how normal people typically develop in relation to the spectrum between individuation and collectivity. |
topic |
Jung analytical psychology normality individuation collectivity Foucault Freud |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/3/4/647 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stevemyers normalityinanalyticalpsychology |
_version_ |
1725697026529689600 |