How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements

There exists a clear association between animacy and the grammatical function of transitive subject. The grammar of some languages require the transitive subject to be high in animacy, or at least higher than the object. A similar animacy preference has been observed in processing studies in languag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: de Swart Peter, van Bergen Geertje
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019-12-01
Series:Open Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0035
id doaj-38479d0e98514e739ec6a34e62f1dc45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38479d0e98514e739ec6a34e62f1dc452021-10-02T19:15:50ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692019-12-015163064910.1515/opli-2019-0035opli-2019-0035How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movementsde Swart Peter0van Bergen Geertje1Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, 6500 HD, The NetherlandsMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, 6525 XD, The NetherlandsThere exists a clear association between animacy and the grammatical function of transitive subject. The grammar of some languages require the transitive subject to be high in animacy, or at least higher than the object. A similar animacy preference has been observed in processing studies in languages without such a categorical animacy effect. This animacy preference has been mainly established in structures in which either one or both arguments are provided before the verb. Our goal was to establish (i) whether this preference can already be observed before any argument is provided, and (ii) whether this preference is mediated by verbal information. To this end we exploited the V2 property of Dutch which allows the verb to precede its arguments. Using a visual-world eye-tracking paradigm we presented participants with V2 structures with either an auxiliary (e.g. Gisteren heeft X … ‘Yesterday, X has …’) or a lexical main verb (e.g. Gisteren motiveerde X … ‘Yesterday, X motivated …’) and we measured looks to the animate referent. The results indicate that the animacy preference can already be observed before arguments are presented and that the selectional restrictions of the verb mediate this bias, but do not override it completely.https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0035verb-initial sentencespredictive processingvisual worlddutchlexical informationselectional restrictionsargument structuregrammar-performance connection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author de Swart Peter
van Bergen Geertje
spellingShingle de Swart Peter
van Bergen Geertje
How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements
Open Linguistics
verb-initial sentences
predictive processing
visual world
dutch
lexical information
selectional restrictions
argument structure
grammar-performance connection
author_facet de Swart Peter
van Bergen Geertje
author_sort de Swart Peter
title How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements
title_short How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements
title_full How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements
title_fullStr How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements
title_full_unstemmed How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements
title_sort how animacy and verbal information influence v2 sentence processing: evidence from eye movements
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Linguistics
issn 2300-9969
publishDate 2019-12-01
description There exists a clear association between animacy and the grammatical function of transitive subject. The grammar of some languages require the transitive subject to be high in animacy, or at least higher than the object. A similar animacy preference has been observed in processing studies in languages without such a categorical animacy effect. This animacy preference has been mainly established in structures in which either one or both arguments are provided before the verb. Our goal was to establish (i) whether this preference can already be observed before any argument is provided, and (ii) whether this preference is mediated by verbal information. To this end we exploited the V2 property of Dutch which allows the verb to precede its arguments. Using a visual-world eye-tracking paradigm we presented participants with V2 structures with either an auxiliary (e.g. Gisteren heeft X … ‘Yesterday, X has …’) or a lexical main verb (e.g. Gisteren motiveerde X … ‘Yesterday, X motivated …’) and we measured looks to the animate referent. The results indicate that the animacy preference can already be observed before arguments are presented and that the selectional restrictions of the verb mediate this bias, but do not override it completely.
topic verb-initial sentences
predictive processing
visual world
dutch
lexical information
selectional restrictions
argument structure
grammar-performance connection
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0035
work_keys_str_mv AT deswartpeter howanimacyandverbalinformationinfluencev2sentenceprocessingevidencefromeyemovements
AT vanbergengeertje howanimacyandverbalinformationinfluencev2sentenceprocessingevidencefromeyemovements
_version_ 1716847501254852608