How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements
There exists a clear association between animacy and the grammatical function of transitive subject. The grammar of some languages require the transitive subject to be high in animacy, or at least higher than the object. A similar animacy preference has been observed in processing studies in languag...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Open Linguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0035 |
id |
doaj-38479d0e98514e739ec6a34e62f1dc45 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-38479d0e98514e739ec6a34e62f1dc452021-10-02T19:15:50ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692019-12-015163064910.1515/opli-2019-0035opli-2019-0035How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movementsde Swart Peter0van Bergen Geertje1Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, 6500 HD, The NetherlandsMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, 6525 XD, The NetherlandsThere exists a clear association between animacy and the grammatical function of transitive subject. The grammar of some languages require the transitive subject to be high in animacy, or at least higher than the object. A similar animacy preference has been observed in processing studies in languages without such a categorical animacy effect. This animacy preference has been mainly established in structures in which either one or both arguments are provided before the verb. Our goal was to establish (i) whether this preference can already be observed before any argument is provided, and (ii) whether this preference is mediated by verbal information. To this end we exploited the V2 property of Dutch which allows the verb to precede its arguments. Using a visual-world eye-tracking paradigm we presented participants with V2 structures with either an auxiliary (e.g. Gisteren heeft X … ‘Yesterday, X has …’) or a lexical main verb (e.g. Gisteren motiveerde X … ‘Yesterday, X motivated …’) and we measured looks to the animate referent. The results indicate that the animacy preference can already be observed before arguments are presented and that the selectional restrictions of the verb mediate this bias, but do not override it completely.https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0035verb-initial sentencespredictive processingvisual worlddutchlexical informationselectional restrictionsargument structuregrammar-performance connection |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
de Swart Peter van Bergen Geertje |
spellingShingle |
de Swart Peter van Bergen Geertje How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements Open Linguistics verb-initial sentences predictive processing visual world dutch lexical information selectional restrictions argument structure grammar-performance connection |
author_facet |
de Swart Peter van Bergen Geertje |
author_sort |
de Swart Peter |
title |
How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_short |
How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_full |
How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_fullStr |
How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_full_unstemmed |
How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements |
title_sort |
how animacy and verbal information influence v2 sentence processing: evidence from eye movements |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Linguistics |
issn |
2300-9969 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
There exists a clear association between animacy and the grammatical function of transitive subject. The grammar of some languages require the transitive subject to be high in animacy, or at least higher than the object. A similar animacy preference has been observed in processing studies in languages without such a categorical animacy effect. This animacy preference has been mainly established in structures in which either one or both arguments are provided before the verb. Our goal was to establish (i) whether this preference can already be observed before any argument is provided, and (ii) whether this preference is mediated by verbal information. To this end we exploited the V2 property of Dutch which allows the verb to precede its arguments. Using a visual-world eye-tracking paradigm we presented participants with V2 structures with either an auxiliary (e.g. Gisteren heeft X … ‘Yesterday, X has …’) or a lexical main verb (e.g. Gisteren motiveerde X … ‘Yesterday, X motivated …’) and we measured looks to the animate referent. The results indicate that the animacy preference can already be observed before arguments are presented and that the selectional restrictions of the verb mediate this bias, but do not override it completely. |
topic |
verb-initial sentences predictive processing visual world dutch lexical information selectional restrictions argument structure grammar-performance connection |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0035 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT deswartpeter howanimacyandverbalinformationinfluencev2sentenceprocessingevidencefromeyemovements AT vanbergengeertje howanimacyandverbalinformationinfluencev2sentenceprocessingevidencefromeyemovements |
_version_ |
1716847501254852608 |