Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

Background and purpose — Partial knee replacement (PKR) survival rates vary a great deal among registries and cohort studies. These discrepancies can largely be attributed to inappropriate indications of the PKR and low thresholds for revision, but also to the PKR volume. This study used Dutch Arthr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iris van Oost, Koen L M Koenraadt, Liza N van Steenbergen, Stefan B T Bolder, Rutger C I van Geenen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-07-01
Series:Acta Orthopaedica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1752017
id doaj-3827651de5f0495cb736c9b504cdb96b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3827651de5f0495cb736c9b504cdb96b2021-04-02T12:54:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Orthopaedica1745-36741745-36822020-07-0191442643210.1080/17453674.2020.17520171752017Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty RegisterIris van Oost0Koen L M Koenraadt1Liza N van Steenbergen2Stefan B T Bolder3Rutger C I van Geenen4Amphia HospitalAmphia HospitalDutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)Amphia HospitalAmphia HospitalBackground and purpose — Partial knee replacement (PKR) survival rates vary a great deal among registries and cohort studies. These discrepancies can largely be attributed to inappropriate indications of the PKR and low thresholds for revision, but also to the PKR volume. This study used Dutch Arthroplasty Register data to analyze whether absolute PKR or proportional PKR hospital volume is associated with the risk of revision. Patients and methods — 18,134 PKRs were identified in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register from 2007 to 2016. For each year, hospitals were divided into 4 groups based on the quartiles for the absolute volume (< 22, 22–36, 36–58 and > 58 PKRs per year) and the proportional volume (< 8.5, 8.6–14.2, 14.3–25.8 and > 25.8% PKRs). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to determine survival rates. A multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age category, sex, ASA score, year of surgery, diagnosis, unicondylar side, and type of hospital was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for revision. Results and interpretation — Proportional PKR volume did not, but absolute PKR volume did influence the risk of revision. The adjusted HR for hospitals with an absolute volume of 22–36 PKRs per year was 1.04 (95% CI 0.91–1.20), 0.96 (CI 0.83–1.10) for the hospitals with 36–58 PKRs, and 0.74 (CI 0.62–0.89) for hospitals with more than 58 PKRs compared with hospitals that had fewer than 22 PKRs per year. So, patients treated with a PKR in a high absolute volume hospital have a lower risk of revision compared with those treated in a low absolute volume hospital.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1752017
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iris van Oost
Koen L M Koenraadt
Liza N van Steenbergen
Stefan B T Bolder
Rutger C I van Geenen
spellingShingle Iris van Oost
Koen L M Koenraadt
Liza N van Steenbergen
Stefan B T Bolder
Rutger C I van Geenen
Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
Acta Orthopaedica
author_facet Iris van Oost
Koen L M Koenraadt
Liza N van Steenbergen
Stefan B T Bolder
Rutger C I van Geenen
author_sort Iris van Oost
title Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
title_short Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
title_full Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
title_fullStr Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
title_full_unstemmed Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
title_sort higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the dutch arthroplasty register
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Acta Orthopaedica
issn 1745-3674
1745-3682
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Background and purpose — Partial knee replacement (PKR) survival rates vary a great deal among registries and cohort studies. These discrepancies can largely be attributed to inappropriate indications of the PKR and low thresholds for revision, but also to the PKR volume. This study used Dutch Arthroplasty Register data to analyze whether absolute PKR or proportional PKR hospital volume is associated with the risk of revision. Patients and methods — 18,134 PKRs were identified in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register from 2007 to 2016. For each year, hospitals were divided into 4 groups based on the quartiles for the absolute volume (< 22, 22–36, 36–58 and > 58 PKRs per year) and the proportional volume (< 8.5, 8.6–14.2, 14.3–25.8 and > 25.8% PKRs). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to determine survival rates. A multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age category, sex, ASA score, year of surgery, diagnosis, unicondylar side, and type of hospital was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for revision. Results and interpretation — Proportional PKR volume did not, but absolute PKR volume did influence the risk of revision. The adjusted HR for hospitals with an absolute volume of 22–36 PKRs per year was 1.04 (95% CI 0.91–1.20), 0.96 (CI 0.83–1.10) for the hospitals with 36–58 PKRs, and 0.74 (CI 0.62–0.89) for hospitals with more than 58 PKRs compared with hospitals that had fewer than 22 PKRs per year. So, patients treated with a PKR in a high absolute volume hospital have a lower risk of revision compared with those treated in a low absolute volume hospital.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1752017
work_keys_str_mv AT irisvanoost higherriskofrevisionforpartialkneereplacementsinlowabsolutevolumehospitalsdatafrom18134partialkneereplacementsinthedutcharthroplastyregister
AT koenlmkoenraadt higherriskofrevisionforpartialkneereplacementsinlowabsolutevolumehospitalsdatafrom18134partialkneereplacementsinthedutcharthroplastyregister
AT lizanvansteenbergen higherriskofrevisionforpartialkneereplacementsinlowabsolutevolumehospitalsdatafrom18134partialkneereplacementsinthedutcharthroplastyregister
AT stefanbtbolder higherriskofrevisionforpartialkneereplacementsinlowabsolutevolumehospitalsdatafrom18134partialkneereplacementsinthedutcharthroplastyregister
AT rutgercivangeenen higherriskofrevisionforpartialkneereplacementsinlowabsolutevolumehospitalsdatafrom18134partialkneereplacementsinthedutcharthroplastyregister
_version_ 1721567174854705152