Identifying Gaps and Missed Opportunities for Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment of Inpatient Stroke

Background: Inpatient stroke-codes (ISC) have traditionally seen low treatment rates with IV-thrombolytic (IVT). The purpose of this study was to identify the predictors of true stroke, prevalent IVT-treatment gap and study the factors associated with such missed treatment opportunities (MTO).Method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karan Topiwala, Karan Tarasaria, Ilene Staff, Dawn Beland, Erica Schuyler, Amre Nouh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2020.00134/full
id doaj-3813e8cce79f4cda858b616ec8c55bb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3813e8cce79f4cda858b616ec8c55bb92020-11-25T02:04:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952020-02-011110.3389/fneur.2020.00134520365Identifying Gaps and Missed Opportunities for Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment of Inpatient StrokeKaran Topiwala0Karan Tarasaria1Ilene Staff2Dawn Beland3Erica Schuyler4Erica Schuyler5Amre Nouh6Amre Nouh7Department of Neurology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United StatesDepartment of Research, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, Ayer Neuroscience Institute, Hartford, CT, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, Ayer Neuroscience Institute, Hartford, CT, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, Ayer Neuroscience Institute, Hartford, CT, United StatesBackground: Inpatient stroke-codes (ISC) have traditionally seen low treatment rates with IV-thrombolytic (IVT). The purpose of this study was to identify the predictors of true stroke, prevalent IVT-treatment gap and study the factors associated with such missed treatment opportunities (MTO).Methods: A retrospective chart review identified ISC from March 2017 to March 2018. Clinical, radiographic and demographic data were collected. Primary analysis was performed between stroke vs. non-stroke diagnoses. Dichotomous variables were analyzed using Chi-Square test of proportions and continuous variables with Wilcoxon-Ranked-Sum test. Significant factors were then tested in a multivariate logistic regression model for independence.Results: From 211 ISC, 36% (n = 76) had an acute stroke. Hemorrhagic stroke (HS) was present in 5.7% (n = 12). Of the remaining 199, 44% (n = 87) were IVT-eligible but only 3.4% (n = 3) were treated. Of the remaining 84 IVT-eligible-but-untreated patients, 69(82.1%) were mimics, while 15 (17.9%) had an ischemic stroke (IS), constituting a MTO of 1 in 6 IVT-eligible patients, with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤4 being the commonest deterrent. Independent predictors of stroke were ejection fraction (EF) <30% (p = 0.030, OR = 3.06), post-operative status (p = 0.001, OR = 3.71), visual field-cut (p = 0.008, OR = 3.70), and facial droop (p = 0.010, OR = 2.59).Conclusion: In our study, one in three ISC were true strokes. IVT treatment rates were low with a MTO of 1 in 6 IVT-eligible patients. The most common reason for not treating was NIHSS ≤4. Knowing predictors of true stroke and the common barriers to IVT treatment can help narrow this treatment gap.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2020.00134/fullin-hospital strokeIV-thrombolyticstroke mimicmissed treatmentquality improvement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karan Topiwala
Karan Tarasaria
Ilene Staff
Dawn Beland
Erica Schuyler
Erica Schuyler
Amre Nouh
Amre Nouh
spellingShingle Karan Topiwala
Karan Tarasaria
Ilene Staff
Dawn Beland
Erica Schuyler
Erica Schuyler
Amre Nouh
Amre Nouh
Identifying Gaps and Missed Opportunities for Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment of Inpatient Stroke
Frontiers in Neurology
in-hospital stroke
IV-thrombolytic
stroke mimic
missed treatment
quality improvement
author_facet Karan Topiwala
Karan Tarasaria
Ilene Staff
Dawn Beland
Erica Schuyler
Erica Schuyler
Amre Nouh
Amre Nouh
author_sort Karan Topiwala
title Identifying Gaps and Missed Opportunities for Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment of Inpatient Stroke
title_short Identifying Gaps and Missed Opportunities for Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment of Inpatient Stroke
title_full Identifying Gaps and Missed Opportunities for Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment of Inpatient Stroke
title_fullStr Identifying Gaps and Missed Opportunities for Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment of Inpatient Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Gaps and Missed Opportunities for Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment of Inpatient Stroke
title_sort identifying gaps and missed opportunities for intravenous thrombolytic treatment of inpatient stroke
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Background: Inpatient stroke-codes (ISC) have traditionally seen low treatment rates with IV-thrombolytic (IVT). The purpose of this study was to identify the predictors of true stroke, prevalent IVT-treatment gap and study the factors associated with such missed treatment opportunities (MTO).Methods: A retrospective chart review identified ISC from March 2017 to March 2018. Clinical, radiographic and demographic data were collected. Primary analysis was performed between stroke vs. non-stroke diagnoses. Dichotomous variables were analyzed using Chi-Square test of proportions and continuous variables with Wilcoxon-Ranked-Sum test. Significant factors were then tested in a multivariate logistic regression model for independence.Results: From 211 ISC, 36% (n = 76) had an acute stroke. Hemorrhagic stroke (HS) was present in 5.7% (n = 12). Of the remaining 199, 44% (n = 87) were IVT-eligible but only 3.4% (n = 3) were treated. Of the remaining 84 IVT-eligible-but-untreated patients, 69(82.1%) were mimics, while 15 (17.9%) had an ischemic stroke (IS), constituting a MTO of 1 in 6 IVT-eligible patients, with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤4 being the commonest deterrent. Independent predictors of stroke were ejection fraction (EF) <30% (p = 0.030, OR = 3.06), post-operative status (p = 0.001, OR = 3.71), visual field-cut (p = 0.008, OR = 3.70), and facial droop (p = 0.010, OR = 2.59).Conclusion: In our study, one in three ISC were true strokes. IVT treatment rates were low with a MTO of 1 in 6 IVT-eligible patients. The most common reason for not treating was NIHSS ≤4. Knowing predictors of true stroke and the common barriers to IVT treatment can help narrow this treatment gap.
topic in-hospital stroke
IV-thrombolytic
stroke mimic
missed treatment
quality improvement
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2020.00134/full
work_keys_str_mv AT karantopiwala identifyinggapsandmissedopportunitiesforintravenousthrombolytictreatmentofinpatientstroke
AT karantarasaria identifyinggapsandmissedopportunitiesforintravenousthrombolytictreatmentofinpatientstroke
AT ilenestaff identifyinggapsandmissedopportunitiesforintravenousthrombolytictreatmentofinpatientstroke
AT dawnbeland identifyinggapsandmissedopportunitiesforintravenousthrombolytictreatmentofinpatientstroke
AT ericaschuyler identifyinggapsandmissedopportunitiesforintravenousthrombolytictreatmentofinpatientstroke
AT ericaschuyler identifyinggapsandmissedopportunitiesforintravenousthrombolytictreatmentofinpatientstroke
AT amrenouh identifyinggapsandmissedopportunitiesforintravenousthrombolytictreatmentofinpatientstroke
AT amrenouh identifyinggapsandmissedopportunitiesforintravenousthrombolytictreatmentofinpatientstroke
_version_ 1724943581146251264