Effects of Chemical and Mechanical Lysis on Microbial DNA Yield, Integrity, and Downstream Amplicon Sequencing of Rumen Bacteria and Protozoa

QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, United States) and RBB + C (Yu and Morrison, 2004) methodologies are widely employed to extract microbial DNA from rumen samples and can exhibit different efficiencies of obtaining DNA yield, quality, and downstream amplicon sequence analysis. No...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhi Yuan Ma, Xiu Min Zhang, Rong Wang, Min Wang, Ting Liu, Zhi Liang Tan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.581227/full
id doaj-380963bc0d554d959dc8a05a800e50a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-380963bc0d554d959dc8a05a800e50a62020-11-25T04:01:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2020-11-011110.3389/fmicb.2020.581227581227Effects of Chemical and Mechanical Lysis on Microbial DNA Yield, Integrity, and Downstream Amplicon Sequencing of Rumen Bacteria and ProtozoaZhi Yuan Ma0Zhi Yuan Ma1Xiu Min Zhang2Rong Wang3Min Wang4Ting Liu5Zhi Liang Tan6CAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, ChinaCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, ChinaCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, ChinaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, ChinaCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, ChinaQIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, United States) and RBB + C (Yu and Morrison, 2004) methodologies are widely employed to extract microbial DNA from rumen samples and can exhibit different efficiencies of obtaining DNA yield, quality, and downstream amplicon sequence analysis. No study has conducted to investigate the contributions of chemical and mechanical lysis on DNA extraction, which included chemical lysis from QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIA) and RBB + C (YM), bead (BB), and sand beating (SB). Effects of chemical lysis and bead beating (BB) were investigated by conducting a 2 × 2 factorial-designed experiment with four methodologies, including QIA without (QIA−) and with BB (QIA + BB), and YM without (YM−) and with BB (YM + BB). Comparisons between bead and sand were conducted by comparing methodologies of YM + BB and YM + SB. Comparing with QIA, YM had lower (P ≤ 0.10) OD260/280 and diversity of ZOTUs and length polymorphism of protozoal amplicons but harvested greater (P ≤ 0.086) DNA from fibrolytic bacteria such as Ruminococcaceae lineages. Including BB increased (P = 0.001) total DNA yield without affecting (P ≥ 0.55) OD260/280 and richness of bacterial ZOTUs but decreased (P ≤ 0.08) richness of both ZOTUs and length polymorphism of protozoal amplicon. Bead beating and SB showed no difference (P ≥ 0.19) in DNA yield and quality and bacterial and protozoal community. In summary, chemical lysis provided by RBB + C and QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit should be better to extract DNA for analyzing bacterial and protozoal community, respectively. Sand can be an alternative beater for DNA extraction, and mechanical lysis is not recommended for protozoal community analysis.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.581227/fullchemical lysismechanical lysisDNA extractionrumen fluidbacteriaprotozoa
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhi Yuan Ma
Zhi Yuan Ma
Xiu Min Zhang
Rong Wang
Min Wang
Ting Liu
Zhi Liang Tan
spellingShingle Zhi Yuan Ma
Zhi Yuan Ma
Xiu Min Zhang
Rong Wang
Min Wang
Ting Liu
Zhi Liang Tan
Effects of Chemical and Mechanical Lysis on Microbial DNA Yield, Integrity, and Downstream Amplicon Sequencing of Rumen Bacteria and Protozoa
Frontiers in Microbiology
chemical lysis
mechanical lysis
DNA extraction
rumen fluid
bacteria
protozoa
author_facet Zhi Yuan Ma
Zhi Yuan Ma
Xiu Min Zhang
Rong Wang
Min Wang
Ting Liu
Zhi Liang Tan
author_sort Zhi Yuan Ma
title Effects of Chemical and Mechanical Lysis on Microbial DNA Yield, Integrity, and Downstream Amplicon Sequencing of Rumen Bacteria and Protozoa
title_short Effects of Chemical and Mechanical Lysis on Microbial DNA Yield, Integrity, and Downstream Amplicon Sequencing of Rumen Bacteria and Protozoa
title_full Effects of Chemical and Mechanical Lysis on Microbial DNA Yield, Integrity, and Downstream Amplicon Sequencing of Rumen Bacteria and Protozoa
title_fullStr Effects of Chemical and Mechanical Lysis on Microbial DNA Yield, Integrity, and Downstream Amplicon Sequencing of Rumen Bacteria and Protozoa
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Chemical and Mechanical Lysis on Microbial DNA Yield, Integrity, and Downstream Amplicon Sequencing of Rumen Bacteria and Protozoa
title_sort effects of chemical and mechanical lysis on microbial dna yield, integrity, and downstream amplicon sequencing of rumen bacteria and protozoa
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2020-11-01
description QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, United States) and RBB + C (Yu and Morrison, 2004) methodologies are widely employed to extract microbial DNA from rumen samples and can exhibit different efficiencies of obtaining DNA yield, quality, and downstream amplicon sequence analysis. No study has conducted to investigate the contributions of chemical and mechanical lysis on DNA extraction, which included chemical lysis from QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIA) and RBB + C (YM), bead (BB), and sand beating (SB). Effects of chemical lysis and bead beating (BB) were investigated by conducting a 2 × 2 factorial-designed experiment with four methodologies, including QIA without (QIA−) and with BB (QIA + BB), and YM without (YM−) and with BB (YM + BB). Comparisons between bead and sand were conducted by comparing methodologies of YM + BB and YM + SB. Comparing with QIA, YM had lower (P ≤ 0.10) OD260/280 and diversity of ZOTUs and length polymorphism of protozoal amplicons but harvested greater (P ≤ 0.086) DNA from fibrolytic bacteria such as Ruminococcaceae lineages. Including BB increased (P = 0.001) total DNA yield without affecting (P ≥ 0.55) OD260/280 and richness of bacterial ZOTUs but decreased (P ≤ 0.08) richness of both ZOTUs and length polymorphism of protozoal amplicon. Bead beating and SB showed no difference (P ≥ 0.19) in DNA yield and quality and bacterial and protozoal community. In summary, chemical lysis provided by RBB + C and QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit should be better to extract DNA for analyzing bacterial and protozoal community, respectively. Sand can be an alternative beater for DNA extraction, and mechanical lysis is not recommended for protozoal community analysis.
topic chemical lysis
mechanical lysis
DNA extraction
rumen fluid
bacteria
protozoa
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.581227/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zhiyuanma effectsofchemicalandmechanicallysisonmicrobialdnayieldintegrityanddownstreamampliconsequencingofrumenbacteriaandprotozoa
AT zhiyuanma effectsofchemicalandmechanicallysisonmicrobialdnayieldintegrityanddownstreamampliconsequencingofrumenbacteriaandprotozoa
AT xiuminzhang effectsofchemicalandmechanicallysisonmicrobialdnayieldintegrityanddownstreamampliconsequencingofrumenbacteriaandprotozoa
AT rongwang effectsofchemicalandmechanicallysisonmicrobialdnayieldintegrityanddownstreamampliconsequencingofrumenbacteriaandprotozoa
AT minwang effectsofchemicalandmechanicallysisonmicrobialdnayieldintegrityanddownstreamampliconsequencingofrumenbacteriaandprotozoa
AT tingliu effectsofchemicalandmechanicallysisonmicrobialdnayieldintegrityanddownstreamampliconsequencingofrumenbacteriaandprotozoa
AT zhiliangtan effectsofchemicalandmechanicallysisonmicrobialdnayieldintegrityanddownstreamampliconsequencingofrumenbacteriaandprotozoa
_version_ 1724447691681824768