Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter
In this study, an artificial starter culture was prepared using the core microbial species of JIUYAO to produce Chinese rice wine (CRW). The fermentation activity and flavor profiles of CRW samples fermented with traditional JIUYAO, a commercial starter culture, and our artificial starter culture we...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Microbiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.716281/full |
id |
doaj-38084b1eedc64c629c70b104d6110ff9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-38084b1eedc64c629c70b104d6110ff92021-09-20T06:40:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2021-09-011210.3389/fmicb.2021.716281716281Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial StarterChen ChenZheng LiuWenya ZhouHuaixiang TianJuan HuangHaibin YuanHaiyan YuIn this study, an artificial starter culture was prepared using the core microbial species of JIUYAO to produce Chinese rice wine (CRW). The fermentation activity and flavor profiles of CRW samples fermented with traditional JIUYAO, a commercial starter culture, and our artificial starter culture were compared. The optimal protectant combination for lyophilization of the artificial starter was established as 15.09% skim milk, 4.45% polyethylene glycol, 1.96% sodium glutamate, and 11.81% maltodextrin. A comparative analysis revealed that the ethanol content of the three CRW samples was similar. The total acid content of the CRW sample fermented with the artificial starter (7.10 g/L) was close to that of the sample fermented with JIUYAO (7.35 g/L), but higher than that of the sample fermented with the commercial starter (5.40 g/L). An electronic nose analysis revealed that the olfactory fingerprints of the CRW samples fermented with JIUYAO and the artificial starter resembled each other. For both above mentioned samples, the flavor profiles determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry indicated some differences in the variety and content of the aroma compounds, but the key odorants (odor activity values ≥1), such as isoamyl acetate, ethyl acetate, phenyl alcohol, and isoamyl alcohol, were similar.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.716281/fullChinese rice wineartificial starterJIUYAOflavor profilesresponse surface methodology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chen Chen Zheng Liu Wenya Zhou Huaixiang Tian Juan Huang Haibin Yuan Haiyan Yu |
spellingShingle |
Chen Chen Zheng Liu Wenya Zhou Huaixiang Tian Juan Huang Haibin Yuan Haiyan Yu Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter Frontiers in Microbiology Chinese rice wine artificial starter JIUYAO flavor profiles response surface methodology |
author_facet |
Chen Chen Zheng Liu Wenya Zhou Huaixiang Tian Juan Huang Haibin Yuan Haiyan Yu |
author_sort |
Chen Chen |
title |
Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter |
title_short |
Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter |
title_full |
Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter |
title_sort |
comparison of the fermentation activities and volatile flavor profiles of chinese rice wine fermented using an artificial starter, a traditional jiuyao and a commercial starter |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Microbiology |
issn |
1664-302X |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
In this study, an artificial starter culture was prepared using the core microbial species of JIUYAO to produce Chinese rice wine (CRW). The fermentation activity and flavor profiles of CRW samples fermented with traditional JIUYAO, a commercial starter culture, and our artificial starter culture were compared. The optimal protectant combination for lyophilization of the artificial starter was established as 15.09% skim milk, 4.45% polyethylene glycol, 1.96% sodium glutamate, and 11.81% maltodextrin. A comparative analysis revealed that the ethanol content of the three CRW samples was similar. The total acid content of the CRW sample fermented with the artificial starter (7.10 g/L) was close to that of the sample fermented with JIUYAO (7.35 g/L), but higher than that of the sample fermented with the commercial starter (5.40 g/L). An electronic nose analysis revealed that the olfactory fingerprints of the CRW samples fermented with JIUYAO and the artificial starter resembled each other. For both above mentioned samples, the flavor profiles determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry indicated some differences in the variety and content of the aroma compounds, but the key odorants (odor activity values ≥1), such as isoamyl acetate, ethyl acetate, phenyl alcohol, and isoamyl alcohol, were similar. |
topic |
Chinese rice wine artificial starter JIUYAO flavor profiles response surface methodology |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.716281/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chenchen comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter AT zhengliu comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter AT wenyazhou comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter AT huaixiangtian comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter AT juanhuang comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter AT haibinyuan comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter AT haiyanyu comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter |
_version_ |
1717374669523255296 |