Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter

In this study, an artificial starter culture was prepared using the core microbial species of JIUYAO to produce Chinese rice wine (CRW). The fermentation activity and flavor profiles of CRW samples fermented with traditional JIUYAO, a commercial starter culture, and our artificial starter culture we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Chen, Zheng Liu, Wenya Zhou, Huaixiang Tian, Juan Huang, Haibin Yuan, Haiyan Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.716281/full
id doaj-38084b1eedc64c629c70b104d6110ff9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38084b1eedc64c629c70b104d6110ff92021-09-20T06:40:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2021-09-011210.3389/fmicb.2021.716281716281Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial StarterChen ChenZheng LiuWenya ZhouHuaixiang TianJuan HuangHaibin YuanHaiyan YuIn this study, an artificial starter culture was prepared using the core microbial species of JIUYAO to produce Chinese rice wine (CRW). The fermentation activity and flavor profiles of CRW samples fermented with traditional JIUYAO, a commercial starter culture, and our artificial starter culture were compared. The optimal protectant combination for lyophilization of the artificial starter was established as 15.09% skim milk, 4.45% polyethylene glycol, 1.96% sodium glutamate, and 11.81% maltodextrin. A comparative analysis revealed that the ethanol content of the three CRW samples was similar. The total acid content of the CRW sample fermented with the artificial starter (7.10 g/L) was close to that of the sample fermented with JIUYAO (7.35 g/L), but higher than that of the sample fermented with the commercial starter (5.40 g/L). An electronic nose analysis revealed that the olfactory fingerprints of the CRW samples fermented with JIUYAO and the artificial starter resembled each other. For both above mentioned samples, the flavor profiles determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry indicated some differences in the variety and content of the aroma compounds, but the key odorants (odor activity values ≥1), such as isoamyl acetate, ethyl acetate, phenyl alcohol, and isoamyl alcohol, were similar.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.716281/fullChinese rice wineartificial starterJIUYAOflavor profilesresponse surface methodology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chen Chen
Zheng Liu
Wenya Zhou
Huaixiang Tian
Juan Huang
Haibin Yuan
Haiyan Yu
spellingShingle Chen Chen
Zheng Liu
Wenya Zhou
Huaixiang Tian
Juan Huang
Haibin Yuan
Haiyan Yu
Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter
Frontiers in Microbiology
Chinese rice wine
artificial starter
JIUYAO
flavor profiles
response surface methodology
author_facet Chen Chen
Zheng Liu
Wenya Zhou
Huaixiang Tian
Juan Huang
Haibin Yuan
Haiyan Yu
author_sort Chen Chen
title Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter
title_short Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter
title_full Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter
title_fullStr Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Fermentation Activities and Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Rice Wine Fermented Using an Artificial Starter, a Traditional JIUYAO and a Commercial Starter
title_sort comparison of the fermentation activities and volatile flavor profiles of chinese rice wine fermented using an artificial starter, a traditional jiuyao and a commercial starter
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2021-09-01
description In this study, an artificial starter culture was prepared using the core microbial species of JIUYAO to produce Chinese rice wine (CRW). The fermentation activity and flavor profiles of CRW samples fermented with traditional JIUYAO, a commercial starter culture, and our artificial starter culture were compared. The optimal protectant combination for lyophilization of the artificial starter was established as 15.09% skim milk, 4.45% polyethylene glycol, 1.96% sodium glutamate, and 11.81% maltodextrin. A comparative analysis revealed that the ethanol content of the three CRW samples was similar. The total acid content of the CRW sample fermented with the artificial starter (7.10 g/L) was close to that of the sample fermented with JIUYAO (7.35 g/L), but higher than that of the sample fermented with the commercial starter (5.40 g/L). An electronic nose analysis revealed that the olfactory fingerprints of the CRW samples fermented with JIUYAO and the artificial starter resembled each other. For both above mentioned samples, the flavor profiles determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry indicated some differences in the variety and content of the aroma compounds, but the key odorants (odor activity values ≥1), such as isoamyl acetate, ethyl acetate, phenyl alcohol, and isoamyl alcohol, were similar.
topic Chinese rice wine
artificial starter
JIUYAO
flavor profiles
response surface methodology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.716281/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchen comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter
AT zhengliu comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter
AT wenyazhou comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter
AT huaixiangtian comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter
AT juanhuang comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter
AT haibinyuan comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter
AT haiyanyu comparisonofthefermentationactivitiesandvolatileflavorprofilesofchinesericewinefermentedusinganartificialstarteratraditionaljiuyaoandacommercialstarter
_version_ 1717374669523255296