Teacher Scaffolding of Social and Intellectual Collaboration in Small Groups: A Comparative Case Study

• Main Authors: Elizabeth Kraatz, Manisha Nagpal, Tzu-Jung Lin, Ming-Yi Hsieh, Seung Yon Ha, Saetbyul Kim, Sangin Shin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-01
• Series: Frontiers in Psychology
• Subjects: collaborative discussion; relational equity; participatory equity; teacher scaffolding; idea building
• Online Access: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.587058/full

This comparative case study features two small groups of students engaging in collaborative dialog about social issues. Based on social constructivist theories, the two groups were compared across three major components of the small groups system: social dynamics, intellectual collaboration, and teacher scaffolding. Our goal was to holistically analyze these small group processes to understand why some small groups were highly successful while others were not, even within the same intervention and with the same teacher. Successful groups were those in which all students were able to access the conversational floor, many ideas were considered, students were able to share ideas and discuss collaboratively, and students were able to raise multiple forms of social reasoning to support and explain ideas. Change in social reasoning essay scores prior to and after the intervention were also considered as evidence of group success. Results show that teacher scaffolding and existing student processes served to amplify one another reciprocally. The teacher heightened productive social norms when they were present, which then served to encourage productive intellectual collaboration. However, when productive group norms were not present, the teacher took increasing control over the group, which further hampered productive social and intellectual interactions.