Dogs’ insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy

Abstract Executive function plays a critical role in regulating behaviour. Behaviour which directs attention towards the correct solution leads to increased executive function performance in children, but it is unknown how other animals respond to such scaffolding behaviour. Dogs were presented with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Neilands, Olivia Kingsley-Smith, Alex H. Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79557-8
id doaj-37cde26fa95e4277b9c2860af09c9863
record_format Article
spelling doaj-37cde26fa95e4277b9c2860af09c98632021-01-17T12:43:15ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-01-011111710.1038/s41598-020-79557-8Dogs’ insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogyPatrick Neilands0Olivia Kingsley-Smith1Alex H. Taylor2School of Psychology, University of AucklandSchool of Biology, University of AucklandSchool of Psychology, University of AucklandAbstract Executive function plays a critical role in regulating behaviour. Behaviour which directs attention towards the correct solution leads to increased executive function performance in children, but it is unknown how other animals respond to such scaffolding behaviour. Dogs were presented with an A-not-B detour task. After learning to go through gap A to obtain the reward, the barrier was reversed, and the dogs had to inhibit their learned response and enter through gap B on the opposite side. Failure to do so is known as the perseveration error. In test trials, dogs taking part in one of two scaffolding conditions, a pointing condition, where the experimenter pointed to the new gap, and a demonstration condition, where the experimenter demonstrated the new route, were no less likely to commit the perseveration error than dogs in a control condition with no scaffolding behaviour. Dogs’ lack of responsiveness to scaffolding behaviour provides little support for suggestions that simple social learning mechanisms explains scaffolding behaviour in humans. Instead, our results suggest that the theory of natural pedagogy extends to the development of executive function in humans. This suggests that human children’s predisposition to interpret ostensive-communicative cues as informative may be an innate, species-specific adaptation.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79557-8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrick Neilands
Olivia Kingsley-Smith
Alex H. Taylor
spellingShingle Patrick Neilands
Olivia Kingsley-Smith
Alex H. Taylor
Dogs’ insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy
Scientific Reports
author_facet Patrick Neilands
Olivia Kingsley-Smith
Alex H. Taylor
author_sort Patrick Neilands
title Dogs’ insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy
title_short Dogs’ insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy
title_full Dogs’ insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy
title_fullStr Dogs’ insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy
title_full_unstemmed Dogs’ insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy
title_sort dogs’ insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an a-not-b task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Executive function plays a critical role in regulating behaviour. Behaviour which directs attention towards the correct solution leads to increased executive function performance in children, but it is unknown how other animals respond to such scaffolding behaviour. Dogs were presented with an A-not-B detour task. After learning to go through gap A to obtain the reward, the barrier was reversed, and the dogs had to inhibit their learned response and enter through gap B on the opposite side. Failure to do so is known as the perseveration error. In test trials, dogs taking part in one of two scaffolding conditions, a pointing condition, where the experimenter pointed to the new gap, and a demonstration condition, where the experimenter demonstrated the new route, were no less likely to commit the perseveration error than dogs in a control condition with no scaffolding behaviour. Dogs’ lack of responsiveness to scaffolding behaviour provides little support for suggestions that simple social learning mechanisms explains scaffolding behaviour in humans. Instead, our results suggest that the theory of natural pedagogy extends to the development of executive function in humans. This suggests that human children’s predisposition to interpret ostensive-communicative cues as informative may be an innate, species-specific adaptation.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79557-8
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickneilands dogsinsensitivitytoscaffoldingbehaviourinananotbtaskprovidessupportforthetheoryofnaturalpedagogy
AT oliviakingsleysmith dogsinsensitivitytoscaffoldingbehaviourinananotbtaskprovidessupportforthetheoryofnaturalpedagogy
AT alexhtaylor dogsinsensitivitytoscaffoldingbehaviourinananotbtaskprovidessupportforthetheoryofnaturalpedagogy
_version_ 1724334374683410432