Hippocampal Dosimetry and the Necessity of Hippocampal-Sparing in Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Extensive Brain Metastases
Purpose: To characterize hippocampal dosimetry in Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GK-SRS) for extensive brain metastases and evaluate the need for hippocampal-sparing in GK-SRS treatment planning. Methods and Materials: We reviewed 75 GK-SRS plans for the treatment of 4 to 30 brain metastases...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Advances in Radiation Oncology |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109419301599 |
id |
doaj-37cd3df7a07940609d23205f29b685b1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-37cd3df7a07940609d23205f29b685b12020-11-25T01:47:49ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942020-03-0152180188Hippocampal Dosimetry and the Necessity of Hippocampal-Sparing in Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Extensive Brain MetastasesMatthew D. Riina, BS0Cassandra K. Stambaugh, PhD1Kathryn E. Huber, MD, PhD2Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MassachusettesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MassachusettesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusettes; Corresponding author: Kathryn E. Huber, MD, PhDPurpose: To characterize hippocampal dosimetry in Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GK-SRS) for extensive brain metastases and evaluate the need for hippocampal-sparing in GK-SRS treatment planning. Methods and Materials: We reviewed 75 GK-SRS plans for the treatment of 4 to 30 brain metastases generated without consideration of the hippocampi. The mean dose, maximum dose to 100% of the volume (D100), maximum dose to 40% of the volume (D40), and maximum point dose (Dmax, 0.03 cm3) were obtained for the unilateral and bilateral hippocampi and compared between plans with 4 to 9 and ≥10 lesions. The rate at which plans met hippocampal dose constraints (D100 ≤ 4.21 Gy, D40 ≤ 4.50 Gy, and Dmax ≤ 6.65 Gy) was compared between groups, and each was examined for risk factors associated with excessive hippocampal dosing. For plans that exceeded constraints, we attempted replanning to spare the hippocampi. Results: Compared with those for the treatment of 4 to 9 brain metastases, GK-SRS plans with ≥10 lesions were associated with significantly greater median bilateral mean dose (1.0 vs 2.0, P = .001), D100 (0.4 vs 0.8, P = .003), D40 (0.9 vs 1.9, P = .001), and Dmax (2.0 vs 4.9, P = .0005). These plans also less frequently met hippocampal constraints, with this difference trending toward significance (80% vs 93%; P = .1382; odds ratio 0.29; 95% CI, 0.06-1.4). Risk factors for exceeding constraints included greater total disease volume and closer approach of the nearest metastasis to the hippocampi, both of which depended upon the number of metastases present. Seven plans failed to meet constraints and were successfully replanned to spare the hippocampi with minimal increases in treatment time and without compromise to target coverage or conformity. Conclusions: Patients with extensive brain metastases treated with GK-SRS are at increased risk for excessive hippocampal dosing when ≥10 lesions are present or when lesions are in close proximity to the hippocampi and may benefit from hippocampal-avoidant treatment planning.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109419301599 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matthew D. Riina, BS Cassandra K. Stambaugh, PhD Kathryn E. Huber, MD, PhD |
spellingShingle |
Matthew D. Riina, BS Cassandra K. Stambaugh, PhD Kathryn E. Huber, MD, PhD Hippocampal Dosimetry and the Necessity of Hippocampal-Sparing in Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Extensive Brain Metastases Advances in Radiation Oncology |
author_facet |
Matthew D. Riina, BS Cassandra K. Stambaugh, PhD Kathryn E. Huber, MD, PhD |
author_sort |
Matthew D. Riina, BS |
title |
Hippocampal Dosimetry and the Necessity of Hippocampal-Sparing in Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Extensive Brain Metastases |
title_short |
Hippocampal Dosimetry and the Necessity of Hippocampal-Sparing in Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Extensive Brain Metastases |
title_full |
Hippocampal Dosimetry and the Necessity of Hippocampal-Sparing in Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Extensive Brain Metastases |
title_fullStr |
Hippocampal Dosimetry and the Necessity of Hippocampal-Sparing in Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Extensive Brain Metastases |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hippocampal Dosimetry and the Necessity of Hippocampal-Sparing in Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Extensive Brain Metastases |
title_sort |
hippocampal dosimetry and the necessity of hippocampal-sparing in gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for extensive brain metastases |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Advances in Radiation Oncology |
issn |
2452-1094 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Purpose: To characterize hippocampal dosimetry in Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GK-SRS) for extensive brain metastases and evaluate the need for hippocampal-sparing in GK-SRS treatment planning. Methods and Materials: We reviewed 75 GK-SRS plans for the treatment of 4 to 30 brain metastases generated without consideration of the hippocampi. The mean dose, maximum dose to 100% of the volume (D100), maximum dose to 40% of the volume (D40), and maximum point dose (Dmax, 0.03 cm3) were obtained for the unilateral and bilateral hippocampi and compared between plans with 4 to 9 and ≥10 lesions. The rate at which plans met hippocampal dose constraints (D100 ≤ 4.21 Gy, D40 ≤ 4.50 Gy, and Dmax ≤ 6.65 Gy) was compared between groups, and each was examined for risk factors associated with excessive hippocampal dosing. For plans that exceeded constraints, we attempted replanning to spare the hippocampi. Results: Compared with those for the treatment of 4 to 9 brain metastases, GK-SRS plans with ≥10 lesions were associated with significantly greater median bilateral mean dose (1.0 vs 2.0, P = .001), D100 (0.4 vs 0.8, P = .003), D40 (0.9 vs 1.9, P = .001), and Dmax (2.0 vs 4.9, P = .0005). These plans also less frequently met hippocampal constraints, with this difference trending toward significance (80% vs 93%; P = .1382; odds ratio 0.29; 95% CI, 0.06-1.4). Risk factors for exceeding constraints included greater total disease volume and closer approach of the nearest metastasis to the hippocampi, both of which depended upon the number of metastases present. Seven plans failed to meet constraints and were successfully replanned to spare the hippocampi with minimal increases in treatment time and without compromise to target coverage or conformity. Conclusions: Patients with extensive brain metastases treated with GK-SRS are at increased risk for excessive hippocampal dosing when ≥10 lesions are present or when lesions are in close proximity to the hippocampi and may benefit from hippocampal-avoidant treatment planning. |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109419301599 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matthewdriinabs hippocampaldosimetryandthenecessityofhippocampalsparingingammaknifestereotacticradiosurgeryforextensivebrainmetastases AT cassandrakstambaughphd hippocampaldosimetryandthenecessityofhippocampalsparingingammaknifestereotacticradiosurgeryforextensivebrainmetastases AT kathrynehubermdphd hippocampaldosimetryandthenecessityofhippocampalsparingingammaknifestereotacticradiosurgeryforextensivebrainmetastases |
_version_ |
1725014468334714880 |