Between History and Passion: The Legitimacy of Social Clubs in the Province of Buenos Aires (2001–2007)

In the last few decades the concept of self-regulation accompanied the process of dismantling the welfare state. In this context, in central countries—Europe and North America—the importance given to private regulations versus public action increased, thus requiring new mechanisms of legitimacy. To...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Agustín Elías Casagrande
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2017-03-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/775
id doaj-37a490b921e440df99e45dd2a242d93e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-37a490b921e440df99e45dd2a242d93e2020-11-24T22:52:12ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632017-03-0151344110.17645/pag.v5i1.775438Between History and Passion: The Legitimacy of Social Clubs in the Province of Buenos Aires (2001–2007)Agustín Elías Casagrande0Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, ArgentinaIn the last few decades the concept of self-regulation accompanied the process of dismantling the welfare state. In this context, in central countries—Europe and North America—the importance given to private regulations versus public action increased, thus requiring new mechanisms of legitimacy. To this end, appeals to the principles of economy and technical efficiency to legitimate private regulations have been made by several researchers. However, these principles acquired a negative view in Argentina because they were used to use to legitimate processes that led to various crises, especially taking into consideration the neo-liberal experience of the 1990s. Against this historical background, this paper seeks to show a particular case of legitimizing the self-regulation of non-state organizations (social clubs) by using classic topoi, which had been historically used to legitimize state action. In order to do so, this text focuses on the analysis of “Luna de Avellaneda” Act of 2007, by which the government of Buenos Aires sought to legitimize the self-regulation of clubs appealing to the classical values of democracy, participation, and solidarity. For this, the historical experience of the Argentinean political community will be observed from the perspective of the history of these clubs, thus recovering the social function they played in the diverse political and economic crises.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/775Argentinahistorical representationslegal cultureprivate regulationssocial clubsstate crisis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Agustín Elías Casagrande
spellingShingle Agustín Elías Casagrande
Between History and Passion: The Legitimacy of Social Clubs in the Province of Buenos Aires (2001–2007)
Politics and Governance
Argentina
historical representations
legal culture
private regulations
social clubs
state crisis
author_facet Agustín Elías Casagrande
author_sort Agustín Elías Casagrande
title Between History and Passion: The Legitimacy of Social Clubs in the Province of Buenos Aires (2001–2007)
title_short Between History and Passion: The Legitimacy of Social Clubs in the Province of Buenos Aires (2001–2007)
title_full Between History and Passion: The Legitimacy of Social Clubs in the Province of Buenos Aires (2001–2007)
title_fullStr Between History and Passion: The Legitimacy of Social Clubs in the Province of Buenos Aires (2001–2007)
title_full_unstemmed Between History and Passion: The Legitimacy of Social Clubs in the Province of Buenos Aires (2001–2007)
title_sort between history and passion: the legitimacy of social clubs in the province of buenos aires (2001–2007)
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2017-03-01
description In the last few decades the concept of self-regulation accompanied the process of dismantling the welfare state. In this context, in central countries—Europe and North America—the importance given to private regulations versus public action increased, thus requiring new mechanisms of legitimacy. To this end, appeals to the principles of economy and technical efficiency to legitimate private regulations have been made by several researchers. However, these principles acquired a negative view in Argentina because they were used to use to legitimate processes that led to various crises, especially taking into consideration the neo-liberal experience of the 1990s. Against this historical background, this paper seeks to show a particular case of legitimizing the self-regulation of non-state organizations (social clubs) by using classic topoi, which had been historically used to legitimize state action. In order to do so, this text focuses on the analysis of “Luna de Avellaneda” Act of 2007, by which the government of Buenos Aires sought to legitimize the self-regulation of clubs appealing to the classical values of democracy, participation, and solidarity. For this, the historical experience of the Argentinean political community will be observed from the perspective of the history of these clubs, thus recovering the social function they played in the diverse political and economic crises.
topic Argentina
historical representations
legal culture
private regulations
social clubs
state crisis
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/775
work_keys_str_mv AT agustineliascasagrande betweenhistoryandpassionthelegitimacyofsocialclubsintheprovinceofbuenosaires20012007
_version_ 1725666638075789312