Standard versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study
Symptomatic spondylolisthesis patients may benefit from surgical decompression and stabilization. The standard (S) technique is a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Newer, minimally invasive (MI) techniques seem to provide similar results with less morbidity. We enrolled patients with at...
Main Authors: | Daniel Serban, Niki Calina, Gabriel Tender |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2017-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7236970 |
Similar Items
-
Surgical Outcome of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
by: Mohamed Sawan, et al.
Published: (2012-04-01) -
MICROSURGICAL LANDMARKS IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
by: Javier Quillo-Olvera, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis
by: Lei Xie, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
by: Zhang H, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
by: Qing-Yi Zhang, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)