Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci

ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance of three rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for group A Streptococcus (GAS).DesignA hospital-based, cross-sectional, retrospective study.SettingA comparative study of rapid diagnostic tests for GAS using clinical specimens in a single institute.Parti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ha-Nui Kim, Jeeyong Kim, Woong Sik Jang, Jeonghun Nam, Chae Seung Lim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e025438.full
id doaj-379de735dae04225b66285dd138e5802
record_format Article
spelling doaj-379de735dae04225b66285dd138e58022021-03-22T09:00:42ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-08-019810.1136/bmjopen-2018-025438Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A StreptococciHa-Nui KimJeeyong KimWoong Sik JangJeonghun NamChae Seung LimObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance of three rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for group A Streptococcus (GAS).DesignA hospital-based, cross-sectional, retrospective study.SettingA comparative study of rapid diagnostic tests for GAS using clinical specimens in a single institute.Participants225 children in the outpatient clinics ofKorea University Guro Hospitalwith suspicious symptoms were subjected to throat swab sampling. A dual-swab applicator was used. Samples were stored at below −70°C in a 10 mL transport tube containing 1 mL liquid Stuart’s transport medium.Outcome measuresAll tests were performed in the laboratory by trained clinical laboratory scientists. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and kappa index of three RADTs were compared with the reference PCR test and culture results.ResultsOf the 225 patients suspected of having GAS, 67 and 90 were positive for GAS in the culture and PCR tests, respectively. Compared with the reference culture, the sensitivity for GAS was 92.5% (CI 83.4 to 97.5), 71.6% (CI 59.3 to 81.9) and 74.63% (CI 62.5 to 84.4) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively, and the specificity was 97.0% (CI 93.1 to 99.0), 94.6% (CI 90.1 to 97.5) and 92.9% (CI 87.8 to 96.2) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively. Compared with the reference GAS real-time PCR, the sensitivity was 73.3% (CI 62.9 to 82.1), 63.3% (CI 52.5 to 73.2) and 67.8% (CI 57.1 to 77.2) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively, and the specificity was 99.3% (CI 95.9 to 99.9), 100.0% (CI 97.3 to 100.0) and 99.3% (CI 95.9 to 99.9) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively.ConclusionsThe careUS Strep A Plus is a useful test that showed highly comparable results with those of the culture test and superior performances among the three RADTs. The use of RADTs should be encouraged to provide acceptable and fast results using simple equipment.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e025438.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ha-Nui Kim
Jeeyong Kim
Woong Sik Jang
Jeonghun Nam
Chae Seung Lim
spellingShingle Ha-Nui Kim
Jeeyong Kim
Woong Sik Jang
Jeonghun Nam
Chae Seung Lim
Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
BMJ Open
author_facet Ha-Nui Kim
Jeeyong Kim
Woong Sik Jang
Jeonghun Nam
Chae Seung Lim
author_sort Ha-Nui Kim
title Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_short Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_full Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_fullStr Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_full_unstemmed Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_sort performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group a streptococci
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2019-08-01
description ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance of three rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for group A Streptococcus (GAS).DesignA hospital-based, cross-sectional, retrospective study.SettingA comparative study of rapid diagnostic tests for GAS using clinical specimens in a single institute.Participants225 children in the outpatient clinics ofKorea University Guro Hospitalwith suspicious symptoms were subjected to throat swab sampling. A dual-swab applicator was used. Samples were stored at below −70°C in a 10 mL transport tube containing 1 mL liquid Stuart’s transport medium.Outcome measuresAll tests were performed in the laboratory by trained clinical laboratory scientists. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and kappa index of three RADTs were compared with the reference PCR test and culture results.ResultsOf the 225 patients suspected of having GAS, 67 and 90 were positive for GAS in the culture and PCR tests, respectively. Compared with the reference culture, the sensitivity for GAS was 92.5% (CI 83.4 to 97.5), 71.6% (CI 59.3 to 81.9) and 74.63% (CI 62.5 to 84.4) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively, and the specificity was 97.0% (CI 93.1 to 99.0), 94.6% (CI 90.1 to 97.5) and 92.9% (CI 87.8 to 96.2) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively. Compared with the reference GAS real-time PCR, the sensitivity was 73.3% (CI 62.9 to 82.1), 63.3% (CI 52.5 to 73.2) and 67.8% (CI 57.1 to 77.2) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively, and the specificity was 99.3% (CI 95.9 to 99.9), 100.0% (CI 97.3 to 100.0) and 99.3% (CI 95.9 to 99.9) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively.ConclusionsThe careUS Strep A Plus is a useful test that showed highly comparable results with those of the culture test and superior performances among the three RADTs. The use of RADTs should be encouraged to provide acceptable and fast results using simple equipment.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e025438.full
work_keys_str_mv AT hanuikim performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci
AT jeeyongkim performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci
AT woongsikjang performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci
AT jeonghunnam performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci
AT chaeseunglim performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci
_version_ 1724209014392225792