Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.

Conservation priority setting based on phylogenetic diversity has frequently been proposed but rarely implemented. Here, we define a simple index that measures the contribution made by different species to phylogenetic diversity and show how the index might contribute towards species-based conservat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nick J B Isaac, Samuel T Turvey, Ben Collen, Carly Waterman, Jonathan E M Baillie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-03-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1808424?pdf=render
id doaj-37975aee24934eb5a3c701d36097ac0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-37975aee24934eb5a3c701d36097ac0e2020-11-24T20:40:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-03-0123e29610.1371/journal.pone.0000296Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.Nick J B IsaacSamuel T TurveyBen CollenCarly WatermanJonathan E M BaillieConservation priority setting based on phylogenetic diversity has frequently been proposed but rarely implemented. Here, we define a simple index that measures the contribution made by different species to phylogenetic diversity and show how the index might contribute towards species-based conservation priorities. We describe procedures to control for missing species, incomplete phylogenetic resolution and uncertainty in node ages that make it possible to apply the method in poorly known clades. We also show that the index is independent of clade size in phylogenies of more than 100 species, indicating that scores from unrelated taxonomic groups are likely to be comparable. Similar scores are returned under two different species concepts, suggesting that the index is robust to taxonomic changes. The approach is applied to a near-complete species-level phylogeny of the Mammalia to generate a global priority list incorporating both phylogenetic diversity and extinction risk. The 100 highest-ranking species represent a high proportion of total mammalian diversity and include many species not usually recognised as conservation priorities. Many species that are both evolutionarily distinct and globally endangered (EDGE species) do not benefit from existing conservation projects or protected areas. The results suggest that global conservation priorities may have to be reassessed in order to prevent a disproportionately large amount of mammalian evolutionary history becoming extinct in the near future.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1808424?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nick J B Isaac
Samuel T Turvey
Ben Collen
Carly Waterman
Jonathan E M Baillie
spellingShingle Nick J B Isaac
Samuel T Turvey
Ben Collen
Carly Waterman
Jonathan E M Baillie
Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Nick J B Isaac
Samuel T Turvey
Ben Collen
Carly Waterman
Jonathan E M Baillie
author_sort Nick J B Isaac
title Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.
title_short Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.
title_full Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.
title_fullStr Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.
title_full_unstemmed Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.
title_sort mammals on the edge: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2007-03-01
description Conservation priority setting based on phylogenetic diversity has frequently been proposed but rarely implemented. Here, we define a simple index that measures the contribution made by different species to phylogenetic diversity and show how the index might contribute towards species-based conservation priorities. We describe procedures to control for missing species, incomplete phylogenetic resolution and uncertainty in node ages that make it possible to apply the method in poorly known clades. We also show that the index is independent of clade size in phylogenies of more than 100 species, indicating that scores from unrelated taxonomic groups are likely to be comparable. Similar scores are returned under two different species concepts, suggesting that the index is robust to taxonomic changes. The approach is applied to a near-complete species-level phylogeny of the Mammalia to generate a global priority list incorporating both phylogenetic diversity and extinction risk. The 100 highest-ranking species represent a high proportion of total mammalian diversity and include many species not usually recognised as conservation priorities. Many species that are both evolutionarily distinct and globally endangered (EDGE species) do not benefit from existing conservation projects or protected areas. The results suggest that global conservation priorities may have to be reassessed in order to prevent a disproportionately large amount of mammalian evolutionary history becoming extinct in the near future.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1808424?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT nickjbisaac mammalsontheedgeconservationprioritiesbasedonthreatandphylogeny
AT samueltturvey mammalsontheedgeconservationprioritiesbasedonthreatandphylogeny
AT bencollen mammalsontheedgeconservationprioritiesbasedonthreatandphylogeny
AT carlywaterman mammalsontheedgeconservationprioritiesbasedonthreatandphylogeny
AT jonathanembaillie mammalsontheedgeconservationprioritiesbasedonthreatandphylogeny
_version_ 1716827345166270464