Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions

A “soil carbon hotspot” (SCH) is a geographic area having an abundance of soil carbon, and therefore higher ecosystem services value based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions. Soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and total soil carbon (TSC) are critical data to help identify...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena A. Mikhailova, Christopher J. Post, Mark A. Schlautman, Gregory C. Post, Hamdi A. Zurqani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Cogent Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1817289
id doaj-3793e6e0385d4138919653bd283db035
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3793e6e0385d4138919653bd283db0352021-03-18T15:46:34ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Environmental Science2331-18432020-01-016110.1080/23311843.2020.18172891817289Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissionsElena A. Mikhailova0Christopher J. Post1Mark A. Schlautman2Gregory C. Post3Hamdi A. Zurqani4Clemson UniversityClemson UniversityClemson UniversityReed CollegeClemson UniversityA “soil carbon hotspot” (SCH) is a geographic area having an abundance of soil carbon, and therefore higher ecosystem services value based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions. Soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and total soil carbon (TSC) are critical data to help identify SCH at the farm scale, but monetary methods of hotspot evaluation are not well defined. This study provides a first of its kind quantitative example of farm-scale monetary value of soil carbon (C), and mapping of SCH based on avoided social cost of CO2 emissions using both Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database and field measurements. The total calculated monetary value for TSC storage at the Willsboro Farm based on the SSURGO database was about 7.3 million U.S. dollars ($7.3 M), compared to $2.8 M based on field data from averaged soil core results. This difference is attributed to variation in soil sampling methodology, laboratory methods of soil C analyses, and depth of reported soil C results. Despite differences in total monetary valuation, observed trends by soil order were often similar for SSURGO versus field methods, with Alfisols typically having the highest total and area-normalized monetary values for SOC, SIC, and TSC. Farm-scale C accounting provides a more detailed spatial resolution of monetary values and SCH, compared to estimates based on country-level reports in soil survey databases. Delineation and mapping of SCH at the farm scale can be useful tools to define land management zones, to achieve social profit for farmers, and to realize United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) based on avoided social cost of CO2 emissions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1817289ecosystem services (es)external costshotspotshot momentssocial profitsoil organic carbon (soc)soil inorganic carbon (sic)total soil carbon (tsc)ssurgo
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elena A. Mikhailova
Christopher J. Post
Mark A. Schlautman
Gregory C. Post
Hamdi A. Zurqani
spellingShingle Elena A. Mikhailova
Christopher J. Post
Mark A. Schlautman
Gregory C. Post
Hamdi A. Zurqani
Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions
Cogent Environmental Science
ecosystem services (es)
external costs
hotspots
hot moments
social profit
soil organic carbon (soc)
soil inorganic carbon (sic)
total soil carbon (tsc)
ssurgo
author_facet Elena A. Mikhailova
Christopher J. Post
Mark A. Schlautman
Gregory C. Post
Hamdi A. Zurqani
author_sort Elena A. Mikhailova
title Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions
title_short Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions
title_full Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions
title_fullStr Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions
title_full_unstemmed Determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions
title_sort determining farm-scale site-specific monetary values of “soil carbon hotspots” based on avoided social costs of co2 emissions
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Environmental Science
issn 2331-1843
publishDate 2020-01-01
description A “soil carbon hotspot” (SCH) is a geographic area having an abundance of soil carbon, and therefore higher ecosystem services value based on avoided social costs of CO2 emissions. Soil organic carbon (SOC), soil inorganic carbon (SIC), and total soil carbon (TSC) are critical data to help identify SCH at the farm scale, but monetary methods of hotspot evaluation are not well defined. This study provides a first of its kind quantitative example of farm-scale monetary value of soil carbon (C), and mapping of SCH based on avoided social cost of CO2 emissions using both Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database and field measurements. The total calculated monetary value for TSC storage at the Willsboro Farm based on the SSURGO database was about 7.3 million U.S. dollars ($7.3 M), compared to $2.8 M based on field data from averaged soil core results. This difference is attributed to variation in soil sampling methodology, laboratory methods of soil C analyses, and depth of reported soil C results. Despite differences in total monetary valuation, observed trends by soil order were often similar for SSURGO versus field methods, with Alfisols typically having the highest total and area-normalized monetary values for SOC, SIC, and TSC. Farm-scale C accounting provides a more detailed spatial resolution of monetary values and SCH, compared to estimates based on country-level reports in soil survey databases. Delineation and mapping of SCH at the farm scale can be useful tools to define land management zones, to achieve social profit for farmers, and to realize United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) based on avoided social cost of CO2 emissions.
topic ecosystem services (es)
external costs
hotspots
hot moments
social profit
soil organic carbon (soc)
soil inorganic carbon (sic)
total soil carbon (tsc)
ssurgo
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1817289
work_keys_str_mv AT elenaamikhailova determiningfarmscalesitespecificmonetaryvaluesofsoilcarbonhotspotsbasedonavoidedsocialcostsofco2emissions
AT christopherjpost determiningfarmscalesitespecificmonetaryvaluesofsoilcarbonhotspotsbasedonavoidedsocialcostsofco2emissions
AT markaschlautman determiningfarmscalesitespecificmonetaryvaluesofsoilcarbonhotspotsbasedonavoidedsocialcostsofco2emissions
AT gregorycpost determiningfarmscalesitespecificmonetaryvaluesofsoilcarbonhotspotsbasedonavoidedsocialcostsofco2emissions
AT hamdiazurqani determiningfarmscalesitespecificmonetaryvaluesofsoilcarbonhotspotsbasedonavoidedsocialcostsofco2emissions
_version_ 1724215554660630528