Effect of vitamin E supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: A meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Several epidemiological studies have suggested that vitamin E could reduce the risk of uterine cervical neoplasm. However, controversial data were presented by different reports. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between vitamin E and the risk of cervical neoplasia. We p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoli Hu, Saisai Li, Lulu Zhou, Menghuang Zhao, Xueqiong Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5567498?pdf=render
id doaj-37906f608c4f46aa9f505441851c6f87
record_format Article
spelling doaj-37906f608c4f46aa9f505441851c6f872020-11-25T02:27:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018339510.1371/journal.pone.0183395Effect of vitamin E supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: A meta-analysis of case-control studies.Xiaoli HuSaisai LiLulu ZhouMenghuang ZhaoXueqiong ZhuSeveral epidemiological studies have suggested that vitamin E could reduce the risk of uterine cervical neoplasm. However, controversial data were presented by different reports. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between vitamin E and the risk of cervical neoplasia. We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases through December 31, 2016. Based on a fixed-effects or random-effects model, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the combined risk. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were done to assess the source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed according to survey ways, types of cervical neoplasia, study populations. A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42016036672). In total, 15 case-control studies were included, involving 3741 cases and 6328 controls. Our study suggested that higher category of vitamin E could reduce the cervical neoplasia risk (OR = 0.58, 95% CIs = 0.47-0.72, I2 = 83%). In subgroup-analysis, both vitamin E intake and blood levels of vitamin E had a significant inverse association with the risk of cervical neoplasm. Additionally, we found the same relationship between vitamin E and cervical neoplasia among different populations and types of cervical neoplasia. Meta-regression showed that none of the including covariates were significantly related to the outcomes. No evidence of publication bias was observed. In conclusion, vitamin E intake and blood vitamin E levels were inversely associated with the risk of cervical neoplasia.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5567498?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaoli Hu
Saisai Li
Lulu Zhou
Menghuang Zhao
Xueqiong Zhu
spellingShingle Xiaoli Hu
Saisai Li
Lulu Zhou
Menghuang Zhao
Xueqiong Zhu
Effect of vitamin E supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: A meta-analysis of case-control studies.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Xiaoli Hu
Saisai Li
Lulu Zhou
Menghuang Zhao
Xueqiong Zhu
author_sort Xiaoli Hu
title Effect of vitamin E supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: A meta-analysis of case-control studies.
title_short Effect of vitamin E supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: A meta-analysis of case-control studies.
title_full Effect of vitamin E supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: A meta-analysis of case-control studies.
title_fullStr Effect of vitamin E supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: A meta-analysis of case-control studies.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of vitamin E supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: A meta-analysis of case-control studies.
title_sort effect of vitamin e supplementation on uterine cervical neoplasm: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Several epidemiological studies have suggested that vitamin E could reduce the risk of uterine cervical neoplasm. However, controversial data were presented by different reports. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between vitamin E and the risk of cervical neoplasia. We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases through December 31, 2016. Based on a fixed-effects or random-effects model, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the combined risk. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were done to assess the source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed according to survey ways, types of cervical neoplasia, study populations. A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42016036672). In total, 15 case-control studies were included, involving 3741 cases and 6328 controls. Our study suggested that higher category of vitamin E could reduce the cervical neoplasia risk (OR = 0.58, 95% CIs = 0.47-0.72, I2 = 83%). In subgroup-analysis, both vitamin E intake and blood levels of vitamin E had a significant inverse association with the risk of cervical neoplasm. Additionally, we found the same relationship between vitamin E and cervical neoplasia among different populations and types of cervical neoplasia. Meta-regression showed that none of the including covariates were significantly related to the outcomes. No evidence of publication bias was observed. In conclusion, vitamin E intake and blood vitamin E levels were inversely associated with the risk of cervical neoplasia.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5567498?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaolihu effectofvitaminesupplementationonuterinecervicalneoplasmametaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies
AT saisaili effectofvitaminesupplementationonuterinecervicalneoplasmametaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies
AT luluzhou effectofvitaminesupplementationonuterinecervicalneoplasmametaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies
AT menghuangzhao effectofvitaminesupplementationonuterinecervicalneoplasmametaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies
AT xueqiongzhu effectofvitaminesupplementationonuterinecervicalneoplasmametaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies
_version_ 1724843076674912256