The merger of historically disadvantaged tertiary institutions in South Africa: A case study of the University of Limpopo

Since the merger, few attempts have been made to interrogate the role of leadership on the operational stability of the new university. By employing a qualitative approach, this study allowed the participants to construct an accurate and, in-depth account of what really transpired during and after t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dinkwanyane Kgalema Mohuba, Krishna Govender
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Cogent Business & Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1258133
id doaj-377cb2106dfe4c33b2e775176e58b2fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-377cb2106dfe4c33b2e775176e58b2fb2021-02-08T14:35:57ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Business & Management2331-19752016-12-013110.1080/23311975.2016.12581331258133The merger of historically disadvantaged tertiary institutions in South Africa: A case study of the University of LimpopoDinkwanyane Kgalema Mohuba0Krishna Govender1Regenesys Business SchoolUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalSince the merger, few attempts have been made to interrogate the role of leadership on the operational stability of the new university. By employing a qualitative approach, this study allowed the participants to construct an accurate and, in-depth account of what really transpired during and after the merger. A case study design was used to focus intensely on the leadership challenges bedeviling the merger, using descriptive themes and qualifying vocabulary. Ten Project Steering Committee members of the merged institution were purposively selected to participate in the study. It was ascertained that most of the merger challenges related to poor communication, lack of stakeholder convergence, absence of buy-in from influential constituencies, lack of coherent strategies to deal with change and a lack of trust among the key drivers of the merger. It is recommended that government needs to ensure that future university mergers are stakeholder, rather than politically driven.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1258133mergershigher educationhistorically disadvantaged institutionsleadership
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dinkwanyane Kgalema Mohuba
Krishna Govender
spellingShingle Dinkwanyane Kgalema Mohuba
Krishna Govender
The merger of historically disadvantaged tertiary institutions in South Africa: A case study of the University of Limpopo
Cogent Business & Management
mergers
higher education
historically disadvantaged institutions
leadership
author_facet Dinkwanyane Kgalema Mohuba
Krishna Govender
author_sort Dinkwanyane Kgalema Mohuba
title The merger of historically disadvantaged tertiary institutions in South Africa: A case study of the University of Limpopo
title_short The merger of historically disadvantaged tertiary institutions in South Africa: A case study of the University of Limpopo
title_full The merger of historically disadvantaged tertiary institutions in South Africa: A case study of the University of Limpopo
title_fullStr The merger of historically disadvantaged tertiary institutions in South Africa: A case study of the University of Limpopo
title_full_unstemmed The merger of historically disadvantaged tertiary institutions in South Africa: A case study of the University of Limpopo
title_sort merger of historically disadvantaged tertiary institutions in south africa: a case study of the university of limpopo
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Business & Management
issn 2331-1975
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Since the merger, few attempts have been made to interrogate the role of leadership on the operational stability of the new university. By employing a qualitative approach, this study allowed the participants to construct an accurate and, in-depth account of what really transpired during and after the merger. A case study design was used to focus intensely on the leadership challenges bedeviling the merger, using descriptive themes and qualifying vocabulary. Ten Project Steering Committee members of the merged institution were purposively selected to participate in the study. It was ascertained that most of the merger challenges related to poor communication, lack of stakeholder convergence, absence of buy-in from influential constituencies, lack of coherent strategies to deal with change and a lack of trust among the key drivers of the merger. It is recommended that government needs to ensure that future university mergers are stakeholder, rather than politically driven.
topic mergers
higher education
historically disadvantaged institutions
leadership
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1258133
work_keys_str_mv AT dinkwanyanekgalemamohuba themergerofhistoricallydisadvantagedtertiaryinstitutionsinsouthafricaacasestudyoftheuniversityoflimpopo
AT krishnagovender themergerofhistoricallydisadvantagedtertiaryinstitutionsinsouthafricaacasestudyoftheuniversityoflimpopo
AT dinkwanyanekgalemamohuba mergerofhistoricallydisadvantagedtertiaryinstitutionsinsouthafricaacasestudyoftheuniversityoflimpopo
AT krishnagovender mergerofhistoricallydisadvantagedtertiaryinstitutionsinsouthafricaacasestudyoftheuniversityoflimpopo
_version_ 1724279791730819072