Case Study: Reduction of Gluteal Implant Infection Rates with Use of Retention Sutures

Summary: The intramuscular technique has been the most popular technique among plastic surgeons for gluteal implantation. Complication rates of up to 30% including infection, hematoma, seromas, and dehiscence are reported in several studies. One main question that arises is whether the wound dehisce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arsalan Salamat, MD, Mark Connolly, MD, Irvin Wiesman, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2015-01-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/Fulltext/2015/01000/Article.10.aspx
id doaj-3778d14e527649fcbf2db553bc165ce1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3778d14e527649fcbf2db553bc165ce12020-11-24T23:36:29ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742015-01-0131e28910.1097/GOX.000000000000026201720096-201501000-00010Case Study: Reduction of Gluteal Implant Infection Rates with Use of Retention SuturesArsalan Salamat, MD0Mark Connolly, MD1Irvin Wiesman, MD2From the Department of Surgery, Presence Health Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, Ill.From the Department of Surgery, Presence Health Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, Ill.From the Department of Surgery, Presence Health Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, Ill.Summary: The intramuscular technique has been the most popular technique among plastic surgeons for gluteal implantation. Complication rates of up to 30% including infection, hematoma, seromas, and dehiscence are reported in several studies. One main question that arises is whether the wound dehiscence occurs first followed by infection or vice versa. We present a case study of 3 patients who received gluteal augmentation. We used an alternative technique in closure of the gluteal flap which included the use of retention sutures along the sacral incision. Follow-up included postoperative day 2, every week for 6 weeks, and then every month for 6 months. Postoperatively patients were advised to not sleep in supine position for 3 weeks and avoid pressure to the area. The 3 patients remained infection free at 2 days and weekly for 6 weeks. The use of retention sutures along the flap closure site may be a useful and simple technique to avoid high gluteal implant infection rates that have been reported in the literature. We plan to apply this technique to all of our future gluteal augmentations and track long-term results. Preventing complications will result in improved aesthetic results, increased patient satisfaction, less frequent office visits, and less financial cost to both patient and physician.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/Fulltext/2015/01000/Article.10.aspx
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arsalan Salamat, MD
Mark Connolly, MD
Irvin Wiesman, MD
spellingShingle Arsalan Salamat, MD
Mark Connolly, MD
Irvin Wiesman, MD
Case Study: Reduction of Gluteal Implant Infection Rates with Use of Retention Sutures
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Arsalan Salamat, MD
Mark Connolly, MD
Irvin Wiesman, MD
author_sort Arsalan Salamat, MD
title Case Study: Reduction of Gluteal Implant Infection Rates with Use of Retention Sutures
title_short Case Study: Reduction of Gluteal Implant Infection Rates with Use of Retention Sutures
title_full Case Study: Reduction of Gluteal Implant Infection Rates with Use of Retention Sutures
title_fullStr Case Study: Reduction of Gluteal Implant Infection Rates with Use of Retention Sutures
title_full_unstemmed Case Study: Reduction of Gluteal Implant Infection Rates with Use of Retention Sutures
title_sort case study: reduction of gluteal implant infection rates with use of retention sutures
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Summary: The intramuscular technique has been the most popular technique among plastic surgeons for gluteal implantation. Complication rates of up to 30% including infection, hematoma, seromas, and dehiscence are reported in several studies. One main question that arises is whether the wound dehiscence occurs first followed by infection or vice versa. We present a case study of 3 patients who received gluteal augmentation. We used an alternative technique in closure of the gluteal flap which included the use of retention sutures along the sacral incision. Follow-up included postoperative day 2, every week for 6 weeks, and then every month for 6 months. Postoperatively patients were advised to not sleep in supine position for 3 weeks and avoid pressure to the area. The 3 patients remained infection free at 2 days and weekly for 6 weeks. The use of retention sutures along the flap closure site may be a useful and simple technique to avoid high gluteal implant infection rates that have been reported in the literature. We plan to apply this technique to all of our future gluteal augmentations and track long-term results. Preventing complications will result in improved aesthetic results, increased patient satisfaction, less frequent office visits, and less financial cost to both patient and physician.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/Fulltext/2015/01000/Article.10.aspx
work_keys_str_mv AT arsalansalamatmd casestudyreductionofglutealimplantinfectionrateswithuseofretentionsutures
AT markconnollymd casestudyreductionofglutealimplantinfectionrateswithuseofretentionsutures
AT irvinwiesmanmd casestudyreductionofglutealimplantinfectionrateswithuseofretentionsutures
_version_ 1725523306890657792