The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was an observational cohort study which...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/12/1 |
id |
doaj-3771cf8141144306862d3af15d9f1d68 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3771cf8141144306862d3af15d9f1d682020-11-25T00:50:08ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152012-01-01121110.1186/1471-2415-12-1The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohortBuck DeborahPowell Christine JRahi JugnooCumberland PhillippaTiffin PeterTaylor RobertSloper JohnDavis HelenDawson EmmaClarke Michael P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was an observational cohort study which recruited 460 children aged < 12 years with previously untreated X(T). Eligible subjects were enrolled from 26 UK hospital ophthalmology clinics between May 2005 and December 2006. Over a 2-year period of follow-up, clinical data were prospectively recorded at standard intervals from enrolment. Data collected included angle, near stereoacuity, visual acuity, control of X(T) measured with the Newcastle Control Score (NCS), and treatment. The main outcome measures were change in clinical outcomes (angle, stereoacuity, visual acuity and NCS) in treated and untreated X(T), 2 years from enrolment (or, where applicable, 6 months after surgery). Change over time was tested using the chi-square test for categorical, Wilcoxon test for non-parametric and paired-samples t-test for parametric data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>At follow-up, data were available for 371 children (81% of the original cohort). Of these: 53% (195) had no treatment; 17% (63) had treatment for reduced visual acuity only (pure refractive error and amblyopia); 13% (50) had non surgical treatment for control (spectacle lenses, occlusion, prisms, exercises) and 17% (63) had surgery. Only 0.5% (2/371) children developed constant exotropia. The surgically treated group was the only group with clinically significant improvements in angle or NCS. However, 8% (5) of those treated surgically required second procedures for overcorrection within 6 months of the initial procedure and at 6-month follow-up 21% (13) were overcorrected.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Many children in the UK with X(T) receive active monitoring only. Deterioration to constant exotropia, with or without treatment, is rare. Surgery appears effective in improving angle of X(T) and NCS, but rates of overcorrection are high.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/12/1 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Buck Deborah Powell Christine J Rahi Jugnoo Cumberland Phillippa Tiffin Peter Taylor Robert Sloper John Davis Helen Dawson Emma Clarke Michael P |
spellingShingle |
Buck Deborah Powell Christine J Rahi Jugnoo Cumberland Phillippa Tiffin Peter Taylor Robert Sloper John Davis Helen Dawson Emma Clarke Michael P The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort BMC Ophthalmology |
author_facet |
Buck Deborah Powell Christine J Rahi Jugnoo Cumberland Phillippa Tiffin Peter Taylor Robert Sloper John Davis Helen Dawson Emma Clarke Michael P |
author_sort |
Buck Deborah |
title |
The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort |
title_short |
The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort |
title_full |
The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort |
title_fullStr |
The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort |
title_full_unstemmed |
The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort |
title_sort |
improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Ophthalmology |
issn |
1471-2415 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was an observational cohort study which recruited 460 children aged < 12 years with previously untreated X(T). Eligible subjects were enrolled from 26 UK hospital ophthalmology clinics between May 2005 and December 2006. Over a 2-year period of follow-up, clinical data were prospectively recorded at standard intervals from enrolment. Data collected included angle, near stereoacuity, visual acuity, control of X(T) measured with the Newcastle Control Score (NCS), and treatment. The main outcome measures were change in clinical outcomes (angle, stereoacuity, visual acuity and NCS) in treated and untreated X(T), 2 years from enrolment (or, where applicable, 6 months after surgery). Change over time was tested using the chi-square test for categorical, Wilcoxon test for non-parametric and paired-samples t-test for parametric data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>At follow-up, data were available for 371 children (81% of the original cohort). Of these: 53% (195) had no treatment; 17% (63) had treatment for reduced visual acuity only (pure refractive error and amblyopia); 13% (50) had non surgical treatment for control (spectacle lenses, occlusion, prisms, exercises) and 17% (63) had surgery. Only 0.5% (2/371) children developed constant exotropia. The surgically treated group was the only group with clinically significant improvements in angle or NCS. However, 8% (5) of those treated surgically required second procedures for overcorrection within 6 months of the initial procedure and at 6-month follow-up 21% (13) were overcorrected.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Many children in the UK with X(T) receive active monitoring only. Deterioration to constant exotropia, with or without treatment, is rare. Surgery appears effective in improving angle of X(T) and NCS, but rates of overcorrection are high.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/12/1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT buckdeborah theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT powellchristinej theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT rahijugnoo theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT cumberlandphillippa theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT tiffinpeter theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT taylorrobert theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT sloperjohn theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT davishelen theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT dawsonemma theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT clarkemichaelp theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT buckdeborah improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT powellchristinej improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT rahijugnoo improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT cumberlandphillippa improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT tiffinpeter improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT taylorrobert improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT sloperjohn improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT davishelen improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT dawsonemma improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort AT clarkemichaelp improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort |
_version_ |
1725249179363573760 |