The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was an observational cohort study which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buck Deborah, Powell Christine J, Rahi Jugnoo, Cumberland Phillippa, Tiffin Peter, Taylor Robert, Sloper John, Davis Helen, Dawson Emma, Clarke Michael P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-01-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/12/1
id doaj-3771cf8141144306862d3af15d9f1d68
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3771cf8141144306862d3af15d9f1d682020-11-25T00:50:08ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152012-01-01121110.1186/1471-2415-12-1The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohortBuck DeborahPowell Christine JRahi JugnooCumberland PhillippaTiffin PeterTaylor RobertSloper JohnDavis HelenDawson EmmaClarke Michael P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was an observational cohort study which recruited 460 children aged < 12 years with previously untreated X(T). Eligible subjects were enrolled from 26 UK hospital ophthalmology clinics between May 2005 and December 2006. Over a 2-year period of follow-up, clinical data were prospectively recorded at standard intervals from enrolment. Data collected included angle, near stereoacuity, visual acuity, control of X(T) measured with the Newcastle Control Score (NCS), and treatment. The main outcome measures were change in clinical outcomes (angle, stereoacuity, visual acuity and NCS) in treated and untreated X(T), 2 years from enrolment (or, where applicable, 6 months after surgery). Change over time was tested using the chi-square test for categorical, Wilcoxon test for non-parametric and paired-samples t-test for parametric data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>At follow-up, data were available for 371 children (81% of the original cohort). Of these: 53% (195) had no treatment; 17% (63) had treatment for reduced visual acuity only (pure refractive error and amblyopia); 13% (50) had non surgical treatment for control (spectacle lenses, occlusion, prisms, exercises) and 17% (63) had surgery. Only 0.5% (2/371) children developed constant exotropia. The surgically treated group was the only group with clinically significant improvements in angle or NCS. However, 8% (5) of those treated surgically required second procedures for overcorrection within 6 months of the initial procedure and at 6-month follow-up 21% (13) were overcorrected.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Many children in the UK with X(T) receive active monitoring only. Deterioration to constant exotropia, with or without treatment, is rare. Surgery appears effective in improving angle of X(T) and NCS, but rates of overcorrection are high.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/12/1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Buck Deborah
Powell Christine J
Rahi Jugnoo
Cumberland Phillippa
Tiffin Peter
Taylor Robert
Sloper John
Davis Helen
Dawson Emma
Clarke Michael P
spellingShingle Buck Deborah
Powell Christine J
Rahi Jugnoo
Cumberland Phillippa
Tiffin Peter
Taylor Robert
Sloper John
Davis Helen
Dawson Emma
Clarke Michael P
The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
BMC Ophthalmology
author_facet Buck Deborah
Powell Christine J
Rahi Jugnoo
Cumberland Phillippa
Tiffin Peter
Taylor Robert
Sloper John
Davis Helen
Dawson Emma
Clarke Michael P
author_sort Buck Deborah
title The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_short The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_full The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_fullStr The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_full_unstemmed The improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
title_sort improving outcomes in intermittent exotropia study: outcomes at 2 years after diagnosis in an observational cohort
publisher BMC
series BMC Ophthalmology
issn 1471-2415
publishDate 2012-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to investigate current patterns of management and outcomes of intermittent distance exotropia [X(T)] in the UK.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was an observational cohort study which recruited 460 children aged < 12 years with previously untreated X(T). Eligible subjects were enrolled from 26 UK hospital ophthalmology clinics between May 2005 and December 2006. Over a 2-year period of follow-up, clinical data were prospectively recorded at standard intervals from enrolment. Data collected included angle, near stereoacuity, visual acuity, control of X(T) measured with the Newcastle Control Score (NCS), and treatment. The main outcome measures were change in clinical outcomes (angle, stereoacuity, visual acuity and NCS) in treated and untreated X(T), 2 years from enrolment (or, where applicable, 6 months after surgery). Change over time was tested using the chi-square test for categorical, Wilcoxon test for non-parametric and paired-samples t-test for parametric data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>At follow-up, data were available for 371 children (81% of the original cohort). Of these: 53% (195) had no treatment; 17% (63) had treatment for reduced visual acuity only (pure refractive error and amblyopia); 13% (50) had non surgical treatment for control (spectacle lenses, occlusion, prisms, exercises) and 17% (63) had surgery. Only 0.5% (2/371) children developed constant exotropia. The surgically treated group was the only group with clinically significant improvements in angle or NCS. However, 8% (5) of those treated surgically required second procedures for overcorrection within 6 months of the initial procedure and at 6-month follow-up 21% (13) were overcorrected.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Many children in the UK with X(T) receive active monitoring only. Deterioration to constant exotropia, with or without treatment, is rare. Surgery appears effective in improving angle of X(T) and NCS, but rates of overcorrection are high.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/12/1
work_keys_str_mv AT buckdeborah theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT powellchristinej theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT rahijugnoo theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT cumberlandphillippa theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT tiffinpeter theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT taylorrobert theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT sloperjohn theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT davishelen theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT dawsonemma theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT clarkemichaelp theimprovingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT buckdeborah improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT powellchristinej improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT rahijugnoo improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT cumberlandphillippa improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT tiffinpeter improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT taylorrobert improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT sloperjohn improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT davishelen improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT dawsonemma improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
AT clarkemichaelp improvingoutcomesinintermittentexotropiastudyoutcomesat2yearsafterdiagnosisinanobservationalcohort
_version_ 1725249179363573760