Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.

We respond more quickly to our own face than to other faces, but there is debate over whether this is connected to attention-grabbing properties of the self-face. In two experiments, we investigate whether the self-face selectively captures attention, and the attentional conditions under which this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen Keyes, Aleksandra Dlugokencka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4206440?pdf=render
id doaj-376b238bd0bd476bb31052061abf03e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-376b238bd0bd476bb31052061abf03e62020-11-25T01:00:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01910e11079210.1371/journal.pone.0110792Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.Helen KeyesAleksandra DlugokenckaWe respond more quickly to our own face than to other faces, but there is debate over whether this is connected to attention-grabbing properties of the self-face. In two experiments, we investigate whether the self-face selectively captures attention, and the attentional conditions under which this might occur. In both experiments, we examined whether different types of face (self, friend, stranger) provide differential levels of distraction when processing self, friend and stranger names. In Experiment 1, an image of a distractor face appeared centrally - inside the focus of attention - behind a target name, with the faces either upright or inverted. In Experiment 2, distractor faces appeared peripherally - outside the focus of attention - in the left or right visual field, or bilaterally. In both experiments, self-name recognition was faster than other name recognition, suggesting a self-referential processing advantage. The presence of the self-face did not cause more distraction in the naming task compared to other types of face, either when presented inside (Experiment 1) or outside (Experiment 2) the focus of attention. Distractor faces had different effects across the two experiments: when presented inside the focus of attention (Experiment 1), self and friend images facilitated self and friend naming, respectively. This was not true for stranger stimuli, suggesting that faces must be robustly represented to facilitate name recognition. When presented outside the focus of attention (Experiment 2), no facilitation occurred. Instead, we report an interesting distraction effect caused by friend faces when processing strangers' names. We interpret this as a "social importance" effect, whereby we may be tuned to pick out and pay attention to familiar friend faces in a crowd. We conclude that any speed of processing advantages observed in the self-face processing literature are not driven by automatic attention capture.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4206440?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helen Keyes
Aleksandra Dlugokencka
spellingShingle Helen Keyes
Aleksandra Dlugokencka
Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Helen Keyes
Aleksandra Dlugokencka
author_sort Helen Keyes
title Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.
title_short Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.
title_full Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.
title_fullStr Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.
title_full_unstemmed Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.
title_sort do i have my attention? speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description We respond more quickly to our own face than to other faces, but there is debate over whether this is connected to attention-grabbing properties of the self-face. In two experiments, we investigate whether the self-face selectively captures attention, and the attentional conditions under which this might occur. In both experiments, we examined whether different types of face (self, friend, stranger) provide differential levels of distraction when processing self, friend and stranger names. In Experiment 1, an image of a distractor face appeared centrally - inside the focus of attention - behind a target name, with the faces either upright or inverted. In Experiment 2, distractor faces appeared peripherally - outside the focus of attention - in the left or right visual field, or bilaterally. In both experiments, self-name recognition was faster than other name recognition, suggesting a self-referential processing advantage. The presence of the self-face did not cause more distraction in the naming task compared to other types of face, either when presented inside (Experiment 1) or outside (Experiment 2) the focus of attention. Distractor faces had different effects across the two experiments: when presented inside the focus of attention (Experiment 1), self and friend images facilitated self and friend naming, respectively. This was not true for stranger stimuli, suggesting that faces must be robustly represented to facilitate name recognition. When presented outside the focus of attention (Experiment 2), no facilitation occurred. Instead, we report an interesting distraction effect caused by friend faces when processing strangers' names. We interpret this as a "social importance" effect, whereby we may be tuned to pick out and pay attention to familiar friend faces in a crowd. We conclude that any speed of processing advantages observed in the self-face processing literature are not driven by automatic attention capture.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4206440?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT helenkeyes doihavemyattentionspeedofprocessingadvantagesfortheselffacearenotdrivenbyautomaticattentioncapture
AT aleksandradlugokencka doihavemyattentionspeedofprocessingadvantagesfortheselffacearenotdrivenbyautomaticattentioncapture
_version_ 1725213756109094912