Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory
We use the theory of communities of practice and the concept of accountable disciplinary knowledge to describe how a learning community develops in the context of an upper-division physics laboratory course. The change in accountable disciplinary knowledge motivates students’ enculturation into a co...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research |
Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010109 |
id |
doaj-374b0f73d9b84ad98a95fa1859a8b387 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-374b0f73d9b84ad98a95fa1859a8b3872020-11-25T00:59:44ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research1554-91782014-03-0110101010910.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010109Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratoryPaul W. IrvingEleanor C. SayreWe use the theory of communities of practice and the concept of accountable disciplinary knowledge to describe how a learning community develops in the context of an upper-division physics laboratory course. The change in accountable disciplinary knowledge motivates students’ enculturation into a community of practice. The enculturation process is facilitated by four specific structural features of the course and supported by a primary instructional choice. The four structural features are “paucity of instructor time,” “all in a room together,” “long and difficult experiments,” and “same experiments at different times.” The instructional choice is the encouragement of the sharing and development of knowledge and understanding by the instructor. The combination of the instructional choice and structural features promotes the development of the learning community in which students engage in authentic practices of a physicist. This results in a classroom community that can provide students with the opportunity to have an accelerated trajectory towards being a more central participant of the community of a practice of physicists. We support our claims with video-based observations of laboratory classroom interactions and individual, semistructured interviews with students about their laboratory experiences and physics identity.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010109 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paul W. Irving Eleanor C. Sayre |
spellingShingle |
Paul W. Irving Eleanor C. Sayre Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research |
author_facet |
Paul W. Irving Eleanor C. Sayre |
author_sort |
Paul W. Irving |
title |
Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory |
title_short |
Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory |
title_full |
Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory |
title_fullStr |
Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory |
title_sort |
conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory |
publisher |
American Physical Society |
series |
Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research |
issn |
1554-9178 |
publishDate |
2014-03-01 |
description |
We use the theory of communities of practice and the concept of accountable disciplinary knowledge to describe how a learning community develops in the context of an upper-division physics laboratory course. The change in accountable disciplinary knowledge motivates students’ enculturation into a community of practice. The enculturation process is facilitated by four specific structural features of the course and supported by a primary instructional choice. The four structural features are “paucity of instructor time,” “all in a room together,” “long and difficult experiments,” and “same experiments at different times.” The instructional choice is the encouragement of the sharing and development of knowledge and understanding by the instructor. The combination of the instructional choice and structural features promotes the development of the learning community in which students engage in authentic practices of a physicist. This results in a classroom community that can provide students with the opportunity to have an accelerated trajectory towards being a more central participant of the community of a practice of physicists. We support our claims with video-based observations of laboratory classroom interactions and individual, semistructured interviews with students about their laboratory experiences and physics identity. |
url |
http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010109 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulwirving conditionsforbuildingacommunityofpracticeinanadvancedphysicslaboratory AT eleanorcsayre conditionsforbuildingacommunityofpracticeinanadvancedphysicslaboratory |
_version_ |
1715882982005276672 |