Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory

We use the theory of communities of practice and the concept of accountable disciplinary knowledge to describe how a learning community develops in the context of an upper-division physics laboratory course. The change in accountable disciplinary knowledge motivates students’ enculturation into a co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul W. Irving, Eleanor C. Sayre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2014-03-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010109
id doaj-374b0f73d9b84ad98a95fa1859a8b387
record_format Article
spelling doaj-374b0f73d9b84ad98a95fa1859a8b3872020-11-25T00:59:44ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research1554-91782014-03-0110101010910.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010109Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratoryPaul W. IrvingEleanor C. SayreWe use the theory of communities of practice and the concept of accountable disciplinary knowledge to describe how a learning community develops in the context of an upper-division physics laboratory course. The change in accountable disciplinary knowledge motivates students’ enculturation into a community of practice. The enculturation process is facilitated by four specific structural features of the course and supported by a primary instructional choice. The four structural features are “paucity of instructor time,” “all in a room together,” “long and difficult experiments,” and “same experiments at different times.” The instructional choice is the encouragement of the sharing and development of knowledge and understanding by the instructor. The combination of the instructional choice and structural features promotes the development of the learning community in which students engage in authentic practices of a physicist. This results in a classroom community that can provide students with the opportunity to have an accelerated trajectory towards being a more central participant of the community of a practice of physicists. We support our claims with video-based observations of laboratory classroom interactions and individual, semistructured interviews with students about their laboratory experiences and physics identity.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010109
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul W. Irving
Eleanor C. Sayre
spellingShingle Paul W. Irving
Eleanor C. Sayre
Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory
Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
author_facet Paul W. Irving
Eleanor C. Sayre
author_sort Paul W. Irving
title Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory
title_short Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory
title_full Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory
title_fullStr Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory
title_full_unstemmed Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory
title_sort conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
issn 1554-9178
publishDate 2014-03-01
description We use the theory of communities of practice and the concept of accountable disciplinary knowledge to describe how a learning community develops in the context of an upper-division physics laboratory course. The change in accountable disciplinary knowledge motivates students’ enculturation into a community of practice. The enculturation process is facilitated by four specific structural features of the course and supported by a primary instructional choice. The four structural features are “paucity of instructor time,” “all in a room together,” “long and difficult experiments,” and “same experiments at different times.” The instructional choice is the encouragement of the sharing and development of knowledge and understanding by the instructor. The combination of the instructional choice and structural features promotes the development of the learning community in which students engage in authentic practices of a physicist. This results in a classroom community that can provide students with the opportunity to have an accelerated trajectory towards being a more central participant of the community of a practice of physicists. We support our claims with video-based observations of laboratory classroom interactions and individual, semistructured interviews with students about their laboratory experiences and physics identity.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010109
work_keys_str_mv AT paulwirving conditionsforbuildingacommunityofpracticeinanadvancedphysicslaboratory
AT eleanorcsayre conditionsforbuildingacommunityofpracticeinanadvancedphysicslaboratory
_version_ 1715882982005276672