How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence

In a prospective descriptive laboratory study, 25 Helping Hand™ (HH) (10 without and 15 with reminder system) and 50 Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) (25 with 18-month and 25 with 2-year battery life) were manipulated twice daily following a predefined protocol during 3 consecutive weeks....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabienne Dobbels, Johan Vanhaecke, Sofie Vandenbroeck, Sabina De Geest, Leentje De Bleser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2010-03-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/10/3/1652/
id doaj-373b0ffd53cf42bd967afc2e04c72245
record_format Article
spelling doaj-373b0ffd53cf42bd967afc2e04c722452020-11-25T02:26:20ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202010-03-011031652166010.3390/s100301652How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication AdherenceFabienne DobbelsJohan VanhaeckeSofie VandenbroeckSabina De GeestLeentje De BleserIn a prospective descriptive laboratory study, 25 Helping Hand™ (HH) (10 without and 15 with reminder system) and 50 Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) (25 with 18-month and 25 with 2-year battery life) were manipulated twice daily following a predefined protocol during 3 consecutive weeks. Accuracy was determined using the fixed manipulation scheme as the reference. Perfect functioning (i.e., total absence of missing registrations and/or overregistrations) was observed in 70% of the HH without, 87% of the HH with reminder, 20% MEMS with 18 months, and 100% with 2-year battery life respectively. http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/10/3/1652/electronic monitoringaccuracylaboratory studyadherence behaviour
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fabienne Dobbels
Johan Vanhaecke
Sofie Vandenbroeck
Sabina De Geest
Leentje De Bleser
spellingShingle Fabienne Dobbels
Johan Vanhaecke
Sofie Vandenbroeck
Sabina De Geest
Leentje De Bleser
How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
Sensors
electronic monitoring
accuracy
laboratory study
adherence behaviour
author_facet Fabienne Dobbels
Johan Vanhaecke
Sofie Vandenbroeck
Sabina De Geest
Leentje De Bleser
author_sort Fabienne Dobbels
title How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_short How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_full How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_fullStr How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_full_unstemmed How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
title_sort how accurate are electronic monitoring devices? a laboratory study testing two devices to measure medication adherence
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2010-03-01
description In a prospective descriptive laboratory study, 25 Helping Hand™ (HH) (10 without and 15 with reminder system) and 50 Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) (25 with 18-month and 25 with 2-year battery life) were manipulated twice daily following a predefined protocol during 3 consecutive weeks. Accuracy was determined using the fixed manipulation scheme as the reference. Perfect functioning (i.e., total absence of missing registrations and/or overregistrations) was observed in 70% of the HH without, 87% of the HH with reminder, 20% MEMS with 18 months, and 100% with 2-year battery life respectively.
topic electronic monitoring
accuracy
laboratory study
adherence behaviour
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/10/3/1652/
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiennedobbels howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence
AT johanvanhaecke howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence
AT sofievandenbroeck howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence
AT sabinadegeest howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence
AT leentjedebleser howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence
_version_ 1724847764859256832