How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence
In a prospective descriptive laboratory study, 25 Helping Hand™ (HH) (10 without and 15 with reminder system) and 50 Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) (25 with 18-month and 25 with 2-year battery life) were manipulated twice daily following a predefined protocol during 3 consecutive weeks....
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2010-03-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/10/3/1652/ |
id |
doaj-373b0ffd53cf42bd967afc2e04c72245 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-373b0ffd53cf42bd967afc2e04c722452020-11-25T02:26:20ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202010-03-011031652166010.3390/s100301652How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication AdherenceFabienne DobbelsJohan VanhaeckeSofie VandenbroeckSabina De GeestLeentje De BleserIn a prospective descriptive laboratory study, 25 Helping Hand™ (HH) (10 without and 15 with reminder system) and 50 Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) (25 with 18-month and 25 with 2-year battery life) were manipulated twice daily following a predefined protocol during 3 consecutive weeks. Accuracy was determined using the fixed manipulation scheme as the reference. Perfect functioning (i.e., total absence of missing registrations and/or overregistrations) was observed in 70% of the HH without, 87% of the HH with reminder, 20% MEMS with 18 months, and 100% with 2-year battery life respectively. http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/10/3/1652/electronic monitoringaccuracylaboratory studyadherence behaviour |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fabienne Dobbels Johan Vanhaecke Sofie Vandenbroeck Sabina De Geest Leentje De Bleser |
spellingShingle |
Fabienne Dobbels Johan Vanhaecke Sofie Vandenbroeck Sabina De Geest Leentje De Bleser How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence Sensors electronic monitoring accuracy laboratory study adherence behaviour |
author_facet |
Fabienne Dobbels Johan Vanhaecke Sofie Vandenbroeck Sabina De Geest Leentje De Bleser |
author_sort |
Fabienne Dobbels |
title |
How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence |
title_short |
How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence |
title_full |
How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence |
title_fullStr |
How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence |
title_full_unstemmed |
How Accurate Are Electronic Monitoring Devices? A Laboratory Study Testing Two Devices to Measure Medication Adherence |
title_sort |
how accurate are electronic monitoring devices? a laboratory study testing two devices to measure medication adherence |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2010-03-01 |
description |
In a prospective descriptive laboratory study, 25 Helping Hand™ (HH) (10 without and 15 with reminder system) and 50 Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) (25 with 18-month and 25 with 2-year battery life) were manipulated twice daily following a predefined protocol during 3 consecutive weeks. Accuracy was determined using the fixed manipulation scheme as the reference. Perfect functioning (i.e., total absence of missing registrations and/or overregistrations) was observed in 70% of the HH without, 87% of the HH with reminder, 20% MEMS with 18 months, and 100% with 2-year battery life respectively. |
topic |
electronic monitoring accuracy laboratory study adherence behaviour |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/10/3/1652/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fabiennedobbels howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence AT johanvanhaecke howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence AT sofievandenbroeck howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence AT sabinadegeest howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence AT leentjedebleser howaccurateareelectronicmonitoringdevicesalaboratorystudytestingtwodevicestomeasuremedicationadherence |
_version_ |
1724847764859256832 |