The Idea of a Highest Divine Principle — Founding Reason and Spirituality. A Necessary Concept of a Comparative Philosophy?
By reference to the Platonic, Aristotelian, and Neo-Platonic philosophical traditions (and then to German Idealism, including Husserl and Heidegger), I will indicate the way in which the concept of reason—on the one side—depends on the horizon of spirituality (by searching for the ultimate ground wi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2012-10-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/3/4/1025 |
id |
doaj-373836efd34e4aadbc5e47cba78536a3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-373836efd34e4aadbc5e47cba78536a32020-11-24T21:07:57ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442012-10-01341025104010.3390/rel3041025rel3041025The Idea of a Highest Divine Principle — Founding Reason and Spirituality. A Necessary Concept of a Comparative Philosophy?Claudia Bickmann0Philosophical Seminary of the University of Cologne, University of Cologne, Albertus Magnus Platz, D-50937 Cologne, GermanyBy reference to the Platonic, Aristotelian, and Neo-Platonic philosophical traditions (and then to German Idealism, including Husserl and Heidegger), I will indicate the way in which the concept of reason—on the one side—depends on the horizon of spirituality (by searching for the ultimate ground within us and the striving for the highest good); and inversely—how far the idea of the divine or our spiritual self may be deepened, understood and transmitted by reference to reason and rationality. But whereas philosophical analysis aims at the universal dimensions of spirituality or the divine (as in Plato's idea of the 'highest good', the Aristotelian 'Absolute substance', the 'Oneness of the One' (Plotinus and the Neo-Platonists) or the Hegelian 'Absolute spirit'),—Comparative Theology may preserve the dimension of spirituality or divinity in its individuality and specifity. Comparative Theology mediates between the universality of the philosophical discourse and the uniqueness of our individual experience (symbolized by a sacred person—such as Jesus, Brahman, Buddha or Mohammed) by reflecting and analyzing our religious experiences and practices. Religion may lose its specificity by comparative conceptual analysis within the field of philosophy, but Comparative Theology may enhance the vital dimensions of the very same spiritual experience by placing them in a comparative perspective.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/3/4/1025European metaphysicscomparative theologycomparative philosophyspiritualityreason and rationalityKant’s theory of religionHeidegger’s immanent transcendence |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Claudia Bickmann |
spellingShingle |
Claudia Bickmann The Idea of a Highest Divine Principle — Founding Reason and Spirituality. A Necessary Concept of a Comparative Philosophy? Religions European metaphysics comparative theology comparative philosophy spirituality reason and rationality Kant’s theory of religion Heidegger’s immanent transcendence |
author_facet |
Claudia Bickmann |
author_sort |
Claudia Bickmann |
title |
The Idea of a Highest Divine Principle — Founding Reason and Spirituality. A Necessary Concept of a Comparative Philosophy? |
title_short |
The Idea of a Highest Divine Principle — Founding Reason and Spirituality. A Necessary Concept of a Comparative Philosophy? |
title_full |
The Idea of a Highest Divine Principle — Founding Reason and Spirituality. A Necessary Concept of a Comparative Philosophy? |
title_fullStr |
The Idea of a Highest Divine Principle — Founding Reason and Spirituality. A Necessary Concept of a Comparative Philosophy? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Idea of a Highest Divine Principle — Founding Reason and Spirituality. A Necessary Concept of a Comparative Philosophy? |
title_sort |
idea of a highest divine principle — founding reason and spirituality. a necessary concept of a comparative philosophy? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Religions |
issn |
2077-1444 |
publishDate |
2012-10-01 |
description |
By reference to the Platonic, Aristotelian, and Neo-Platonic philosophical traditions (and then to German Idealism, including Husserl and Heidegger), I will indicate the way in which the concept of reason—on the one side—depends on the horizon of spirituality (by searching for the ultimate ground within us and the striving for the highest good); and inversely—how far the idea of the divine or our spiritual self may be deepened, understood and transmitted by reference to reason and rationality. But whereas philosophical analysis aims at the universal dimensions of spirituality or the divine (as in Plato's idea of the 'highest good', the Aristotelian 'Absolute substance', the 'Oneness of the One' (Plotinus and the Neo-Platonists) or the Hegelian 'Absolute spirit'),—Comparative Theology may preserve the dimension of spirituality or divinity in its individuality and specifity. Comparative Theology mediates between the universality of the philosophical discourse and the uniqueness of our individual experience (symbolized by a sacred person—such as Jesus, Brahman, Buddha or Mohammed) by reflecting and analyzing our religious experiences and practices. Religion may lose its specificity by comparative conceptual analysis within the field of philosophy, but Comparative Theology may enhance the vital dimensions of the very same spiritual experience by placing them in a comparative perspective. |
topic |
European metaphysics comparative theology comparative philosophy spirituality reason and rationality Kant’s theory of religion Heidegger’s immanent transcendence |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/3/4/1025 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT claudiabickmann theideaofahighestdivineprinciplefoundingreasonandspiritualityanecessaryconceptofacomparativephilosophy AT claudiabickmann ideaofahighestdivineprinciplefoundingreasonandspiritualityanecessaryconceptofacomparativephilosophy |
_version_ |
1716761354598088704 |