The Concept of Moral Conscience in the Sociological Tradition

In this article the author presents a historical and theoretical analysis of the concept of moral conscience in the sociological tradition, as well as analysis of the most important approaches to studying moral conscience in modern social and cognitive psychology. The crucial classical sociological...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrey V. Bykov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2017-09-01
Series:Социологический журнал
Online Access:http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/5362/submission/proof/5362-61-10690-1-10-20180329.pdf
id doaj-37275f9660eb412eb7c1818574042e45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-37275f9660eb412eb7c1818574042e452020-11-25T03:51:41ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952017-09-01233264310.19181/socjour.2017.23.3.53625362The Concept of Moral Conscience in the Sociological TraditionAndrey V. Bykov0National Research University Higher School of EconomicsIn this article the author presents a historical and theoretical analysis of the concept of moral conscience in the sociological tradition, as well as analysis of the most important approaches to studying moral conscience in modern social and cognitive psychology. The crucial classical sociological concepts of moral conscience by Herbert Spencer and Emile Durkheim are analyzed in a comparative perspective as examples of utilitarian and social realist solutions to the problem of social order. In addition, the author discusses some more recent approaches to studying moral conscience that are related to the social psychological tradition, which is heavily based on classical studies of moral development by L. Kohlberg. It is shown that, despite its inherent shortcomings and limitations, Kohlberg’s theory formed the methodological basis for contemporary moral psychology, which in itself is a distinct field which studies the mechanisms of making moral judgments and evaluations. The predominant approach in the interdisciplinary science of morality, which would be experiments aimed at examining singular moral judgments, is criticized based on the distinction between “thin” and “thick” morality proposed by G. Abend. Also considered are some modern attempts to rekindle interest in studying morale and moral conscience within sociological theory, as well as the so called “sociology of morality”, said attempts being of both descriptive and prescriptive nature. In conclusion the author discusses the possibility for further elaborating the category of moral conscience in sociological theory and research.http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/5362/submission/proof/5362-61-10690-1-10-20180329.pdf
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrey V. Bykov
spellingShingle Andrey V. Bykov
The Concept of Moral Conscience in the Sociological Tradition
Социологический журнал
author_facet Andrey V. Bykov
author_sort Andrey V. Bykov
title The Concept of Moral Conscience in the Sociological Tradition
title_short The Concept of Moral Conscience in the Sociological Tradition
title_full The Concept of Moral Conscience in the Sociological Tradition
title_fullStr The Concept of Moral Conscience in the Sociological Tradition
title_full_unstemmed The Concept of Moral Conscience in the Sociological Tradition
title_sort concept of moral conscience in the sociological tradition
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
series Социологический журнал
issn 1562-2495
publishDate 2017-09-01
description In this article the author presents a historical and theoretical analysis of the concept of moral conscience in the sociological tradition, as well as analysis of the most important approaches to studying moral conscience in modern social and cognitive psychology. The crucial classical sociological concepts of moral conscience by Herbert Spencer and Emile Durkheim are analyzed in a comparative perspective as examples of utilitarian and social realist solutions to the problem of social order. In addition, the author discusses some more recent approaches to studying moral conscience that are related to the social psychological tradition, which is heavily based on classical studies of moral development by L. Kohlberg. It is shown that, despite its inherent shortcomings and limitations, Kohlberg’s theory formed the methodological basis for contemporary moral psychology, which in itself is a distinct field which studies the mechanisms of making moral judgments and evaluations. The predominant approach in the interdisciplinary science of morality, which would be experiments aimed at examining singular moral judgments, is criticized based on the distinction between “thin” and “thick” morality proposed by G. Abend. Also considered are some modern attempts to rekindle interest in studying morale and moral conscience within sociological theory, as well as the so called “sociology of morality”, said attempts being of both descriptive and prescriptive nature. In conclusion the author discusses the possibility for further elaborating the category of moral conscience in sociological theory and research.
url http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/5362/submission/proof/5362-61-10690-1-10-20180329.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT andreyvbykov theconceptofmoralconscienceinthesociologicaltradition
AT andreyvbykov conceptofmoralconscienceinthesociologicaltradition
_version_ 1724486150582697984