Assessment of prophylactic antibiotics administration for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract. Background:. Recent evidence has shown that prophylactic antibiotic treatment in patients with acute pancreatitis is not associated with a significant decrease in mortality or morbidity. The use and efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic treatment in acute pancreatitis remain controversial. T...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Chinese Medical Journal |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000603 |
id |
doaj-37244d5f2956478e8f6c860f6659de68 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-37244d5f2956478e8f6c860f6659de682020-12-02T07:55:06ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992542-56412020-01-01133221222010.1097/CM9.0000000000000603202001200-00012Assessment of prophylactic antibiotics administration for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsNan DingYong-Hui SunLi-Mei WenJian-Hua WangJian-Hua YangKun ChengHai LinQi-Long ChenQiang ShiAbstract. Background:. Recent evidence has shown that prophylactic antibiotic treatment in patients with acute pancreatitis is not associated with a significant decrease in mortality or morbidity. The use and efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic treatment in acute pancreatitis remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods:. We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prophylactic use of antibiotics using Medline (PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software. We performed pooled analyses for infected pancreatic necrosis, mortality, surgical intervention, and non-pancreatic infection. Odds ratios (ORs) from each trial were pooled using a random or fixed effects model, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. Sub-group analysis or sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, when necessary. Results:. Totally, 11 RCTs involving 747 participants were included, with an intervention group (prophylactic use of antibiotics, n = 376) and control group (n = 371). No significant differences were found regarding antibiotic prophylaxis with respect to incidence of infected pancreatic necrosis (OR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50–1.09; P = 0.13), surgical intervention (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62–1.38; P = 0.70), and morality (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.44–1.15; P = 0.16). However, antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of non-pancreatic infection (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42–0.84; P = 0.004). Conclusions:. Prophylactic antibiotics can reduce the incidence of non-pancreatic infection in patients with AP.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000603 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nan Ding Yong-Hui Sun Li-Mei Wen Jian-Hua Wang Jian-Hua Yang Kun Cheng Hai Lin Qi-Long Chen Qiang Shi |
spellingShingle |
Nan Ding Yong-Hui Sun Li-Mei Wen Jian-Hua Wang Jian-Hua Yang Kun Cheng Hai Lin Qi-Long Chen Qiang Shi Assessment of prophylactic antibiotics administration for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Chinese Medical Journal |
author_facet |
Nan Ding Yong-Hui Sun Li-Mei Wen Jian-Hua Wang Jian-Hua Yang Kun Cheng Hai Lin Qi-Long Chen Qiang Shi |
author_sort |
Nan Ding |
title |
Assessment of prophylactic antibiotics administration for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short |
Assessment of prophylactic antibiotics administration for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full |
Assessment of prophylactic antibiotics administration for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of prophylactic antibiotics administration for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of prophylactic antibiotics administration for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort |
assessment of prophylactic antibiotics administration for acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer |
series |
Chinese Medical Journal |
issn |
0366-6999 2542-5641 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Abstract. Background:. Recent evidence has shown that prophylactic antibiotic treatment in patients with acute pancreatitis is not associated with a significant decrease in mortality or morbidity. The use and efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic treatment in acute pancreatitis remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial in patients with acute pancreatitis.
Methods:. We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prophylactic use of antibiotics using Medline (PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software. We performed pooled analyses for infected pancreatic necrosis, mortality, surgical intervention, and non-pancreatic infection. Odds ratios (ORs) from each trial were pooled using a random or fixed effects model, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. Sub-group analysis or sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, when necessary.
Results:. Totally, 11 RCTs involving 747 participants were included, with an intervention group (prophylactic use of antibiotics, n = 376) and control group (n = 371). No significant differences were found regarding antibiotic prophylaxis with respect to incidence of infected pancreatic necrosis (OR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50–1.09; P = 0.13), surgical intervention (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62–1.38; P = 0.70), and morality (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.44–1.15; P = 0.16). However, antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of non-pancreatic infection (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42–0.84; P = 0.004).
Conclusions:. Prophylactic antibiotics can reduce the incidence of non-pancreatic infection in patients with AP. |
url |
http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000603 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nanding assessmentofprophylacticantibioticsadministrationforacutepancreatitisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yonghuisun assessmentofprophylacticantibioticsadministrationforacutepancreatitisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT limeiwen assessmentofprophylacticantibioticsadministrationforacutepancreatitisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jianhuawang assessmentofprophylacticantibioticsadministrationforacutepancreatitisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jianhuayang assessmentofprophylacticantibioticsadministrationforacutepancreatitisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kuncheng assessmentofprophylacticantibioticsadministrationforacutepancreatitisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hailin assessmentofprophylacticantibioticsadministrationforacutepancreatitisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT qilongchen assessmentofprophylacticantibioticsadministrationforacutepancreatitisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT qiangshi assessmentofprophylacticantibioticsadministrationforacutepancreatitisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |
_version_ |
1724407979633016832 |