Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia

Research aims: This study evaluates the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill (hereafter: Bill) and provides a recommendation to the Bill. Design/Methodology/Approach: A comparative study was carried out by comparing the Bill with Financial Reporting Acts and other related statutory from the United S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle Claudia, Lindawati Gani, Rafika Yuniasih
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Accounting and Investment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/view/10935
id doaj-36f864b7f203455b88f4f084b292684e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36f864b7f203455b88f4f084b292684e2021-08-05T13:03:36ZengUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaJournal of Accounting and Investment2622-38992622-64132021-02-0122231034110.18196/jai.v22i2.109354778Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of IndonesiaMichelle Claudia0Lindawati Gani1Rafika Yuniasih2Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, West JavaDepartment of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, West JavaDepartment of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, West JavaResearch aims: This study evaluates the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill (hereafter: Bill) and provides a recommendation to the Bill. Design/Methodology/Approach: A comparative study was carried out by comparing the Bill with Financial Reporting Acts and other related statutory from the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and twenty-seven members of the Asian-Oceanian Standard-Setters Group (AOSSG). Research findings: From the total of 24 countries, 60 documents were found, which were then manually analyzed for content and themes. Based on the study results: standard-setting board, accountant certification, and practice monitoring program were proposed to be included in the Bill. Theoretical contribution/Originality: There are few studies on the Financial Reporting Act; therefore, this study seeks to contribute to this gap. Practitioner/Policy implication: This study’s results provide insight for regulators and strengthen the accounting professions as preparers and auditors of financial statements and other related professions. Research limitation/Implication: The limitation of this research is to conduct a comparative study of the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill with the selected countries’ Financial Reporting Acts and similar statutory.https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/view/10935a comparative studyevaluation case studyfinancial reporting actstakeholder theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michelle Claudia
Lindawati Gani
Rafika Yuniasih
spellingShingle Michelle Claudia
Lindawati Gani
Rafika Yuniasih
Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia
Journal of Accounting and Investment
a comparative study
evaluation case study
financial reporting act
stakeholder theory
author_facet Michelle Claudia
Lindawati Gani
Rafika Yuniasih
author_sort Michelle Claudia
title Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia
title_short Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia
title_full Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia
title_sort comparative study of financial reporting act: the case study of indonesia
publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
series Journal of Accounting and Investment
issn 2622-3899
2622-6413
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Research aims: This study evaluates the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill (hereafter: Bill) and provides a recommendation to the Bill. Design/Methodology/Approach: A comparative study was carried out by comparing the Bill with Financial Reporting Acts and other related statutory from the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and twenty-seven members of the Asian-Oceanian Standard-Setters Group (AOSSG). Research findings: From the total of 24 countries, 60 documents were found, which were then manually analyzed for content and themes. Based on the study results: standard-setting board, accountant certification, and practice monitoring program were proposed to be included in the Bill. Theoretical contribution/Originality: There are few studies on the Financial Reporting Act; therefore, this study seeks to contribute to this gap. Practitioner/Policy implication: This study’s results provide insight for regulators and strengthen the accounting professions as preparers and auditors of financial statements and other related professions. Research limitation/Implication: The limitation of this research is to conduct a comparative study of the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill with the selected countries’ Financial Reporting Acts and similar statutory.
topic a comparative study
evaluation case study
financial reporting act
stakeholder theory
url https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/view/10935
work_keys_str_mv AT michelleclaudia comparativestudyoffinancialreportingactthecasestudyofindonesia
AT lindawatigani comparativestudyoffinancialreportingactthecasestudyofindonesia
AT rafikayuniasih comparativestudyoffinancialreportingactthecasestudyofindonesia
_version_ 1721220802277277696