Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia
Research aims: This study evaluates the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill (hereafter: Bill) and provides a recommendation to the Bill. Design/Methodology/Approach: A comparative study was carried out by comparing the Bill with Financial Reporting Acts and other related statutory from the United S...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Accounting and Investment |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/view/10935 |
id |
doaj-36f864b7f203455b88f4f084b292684e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-36f864b7f203455b88f4f084b292684e2021-08-05T13:03:36ZengUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaJournal of Accounting and Investment2622-38992622-64132021-02-0122231034110.18196/jai.v22i2.109354778Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of IndonesiaMichelle Claudia0Lindawati Gani1Rafika Yuniasih2Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, West JavaDepartment of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, West JavaDepartment of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, West JavaResearch aims: This study evaluates the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill (hereafter: Bill) and provides a recommendation to the Bill. Design/Methodology/Approach: A comparative study was carried out by comparing the Bill with Financial Reporting Acts and other related statutory from the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and twenty-seven members of the Asian-Oceanian Standard-Setters Group (AOSSG). Research findings: From the total of 24 countries, 60 documents were found, which were then manually analyzed for content and themes. Based on the study results: standard-setting board, accountant certification, and practice monitoring program were proposed to be included in the Bill. Theoretical contribution/Originality: There are few studies on the Financial Reporting Act; therefore, this study seeks to contribute to this gap. Practitioner/Policy implication: This study’s results provide insight for regulators and strengthen the accounting professions as preparers and auditors of financial statements and other related professions. Research limitation/Implication: The limitation of this research is to conduct a comparative study of the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill with the selected countries’ Financial Reporting Acts and similar statutory.https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/view/10935a comparative studyevaluation case studyfinancial reporting actstakeholder theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michelle Claudia Lindawati Gani Rafika Yuniasih |
spellingShingle |
Michelle Claudia Lindawati Gani Rafika Yuniasih Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia Journal of Accounting and Investment a comparative study evaluation case study financial reporting act stakeholder theory |
author_facet |
Michelle Claudia Lindawati Gani Rafika Yuniasih |
author_sort |
Michelle Claudia |
title |
Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia |
title_short |
Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia |
title_full |
Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Study of Financial Reporting Act: The Case Study of Indonesia |
title_sort |
comparative study of financial reporting act: the case study of indonesia |
publisher |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta |
series |
Journal of Accounting and Investment |
issn |
2622-3899 2622-6413 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Research aims: This study evaluates the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill (hereafter: Bill) and provides a recommendation to the Bill.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A comparative study was carried out by comparing the Bill with Financial Reporting Acts and other related statutory from the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and twenty-seven members of the Asian-Oceanian Standard-Setters Group (AOSSG).
Research findings: From the total of 24 countries, 60 documents were found, which were then manually analyzed for content and themes. Based on the study results: standard-setting board, accountant certification, and practice monitoring program were proposed to be included in the Bill.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: There are few studies on the Financial Reporting Act; therefore, this study seeks to contribute to this gap.
Practitioner/Policy implication: This study’s results provide insight for regulators and strengthen the accounting professions as preparers and auditors of financial statements and other related professions.
Research limitation/Implication: The limitation of this research is to conduct a comparative study of the Indonesian Financial Reporting Bill with the selected countries’ Financial Reporting Acts and similar statutory. |
topic |
a comparative study evaluation case study financial reporting act stakeholder theory |
url |
https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/view/10935 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michelleclaudia comparativestudyoffinancialreportingactthecasestudyofindonesia AT lindawatigani comparativestudyoffinancialreportingactthecasestudyofindonesia AT rafikayuniasih comparativestudyoffinancialreportingactthecasestudyofindonesia |
_version_ |
1721220802277277696 |