Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading
Native (L1) and second-language (L2) sentence processing can sometimes be shallow. A Good-Enough approach suggests that speakers may engage in shallow processing if the task permits. This study tests English native speakers and native Chinese L2 learners of English to explore whether different task...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847/full |
id |
doaj-36f060d575dd4aa283715c52de75513e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-36f060d575dd4aa283715c52de75513e2020-11-25T03:24:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-09-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847575847Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced ReadingMaryann Tan0Anouschka Foltz1Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Faculty of Humanities, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenInstitute of English Studies, University of Graz, Graz, AustriaNative (L1) and second-language (L2) sentence processing can sometimes be shallow. A Good-Enough approach suggests that speakers may engage in shallow processing if the task permits. This study tests English native speakers and native Chinese L2 learners of English to explore whether different task demands affect their sentence processing. In a self-paced reading task, participants read globally or temporarily ambiguous sentences with relative clauses preceded by a matrix clause containing two noun phrases (NPs). Comprehension questions modulated task difficulty: Half the participants received comprehension questions that probed their interpretation of the relative clauses whereas the remaining half received superficial questions unrelated to the relative clauses. Task difficulty affected reading times at the point of disambiguation for both L1 and L2 participants. Additionally, participants’ attachment choices for globally ambiguous sentences were consistent with reading times of the disambiguating region in both L1 and L2 readers. The results suggest that both L1 and L2 syntactic processing is modulated by the task at hand. We argue for a similar treatment of shallowness for L1 and L2 speakers in models of sentence processing, along the lines of the Good-Enough approach to language processing.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847/fullsentence processingsecond language (L2)task effectssyntactic ambiguitygood-enough processing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maryann Tan Anouschka Foltz |
spellingShingle |
Maryann Tan Anouschka Foltz Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading Frontiers in Psychology sentence processing second language (L2) task effects syntactic ambiguity good-enough processing |
author_facet |
Maryann Tan Anouschka Foltz |
author_sort |
Maryann Tan |
title |
Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading |
title_short |
Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading |
title_full |
Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading |
title_fullStr |
Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading |
title_full_unstemmed |
Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading |
title_sort |
task sensitivity in l2 english speakers’ syntactic processing: evidence for good-enough processing in self-paced reading |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Native (L1) and second-language (L2) sentence processing can sometimes be shallow. A Good-Enough approach suggests that speakers may engage in shallow processing if the task permits. This study tests English native speakers and native Chinese L2 learners of English to explore whether different task demands affect their sentence processing. In a self-paced reading task, participants read globally or temporarily ambiguous sentences with relative clauses preceded by a matrix clause containing two noun phrases (NPs). Comprehension questions modulated task difficulty: Half the participants received comprehension questions that probed their interpretation of the relative clauses whereas the remaining half received superficial questions unrelated to the relative clauses. Task difficulty affected reading times at the point of disambiguation for both L1 and L2 participants. Additionally, participants’ attachment choices for globally ambiguous sentences were consistent with reading times of the disambiguating region in both L1 and L2 readers. The results suggest that both L1 and L2 syntactic processing is modulated by the task at hand. We argue for a similar treatment of shallowness for L1 and L2 speakers in models of sentence processing, along the lines of the Good-Enough approach to language processing. |
topic |
sentence processing second language (L2) task effects syntactic ambiguity good-enough processing |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maryanntan tasksensitivityinl2englishspeakerssyntacticprocessingevidenceforgoodenoughprocessinginselfpacedreading AT anouschkafoltz tasksensitivityinl2englishspeakerssyntacticprocessingevidenceforgoodenoughprocessinginselfpacedreading |
_version_ |
1724601534400954368 |