Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading

Native (L1) and second-language (L2) sentence processing can sometimes be shallow. A Good-Enough approach suggests that speakers may engage in shallow processing if the task permits. This study tests English native speakers and native Chinese L2 learners of English to explore whether different task...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryann Tan, Anouschka Foltz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847/full
id doaj-36f060d575dd4aa283715c52de75513e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36f060d575dd4aa283715c52de75513e2020-11-25T03:24:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-09-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847575847Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced ReadingMaryann Tan0Anouschka Foltz1Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Faculty of Humanities, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenInstitute of English Studies, University of Graz, Graz, AustriaNative (L1) and second-language (L2) sentence processing can sometimes be shallow. A Good-Enough approach suggests that speakers may engage in shallow processing if the task permits. This study tests English native speakers and native Chinese L2 learners of English to explore whether different task demands affect their sentence processing. In a self-paced reading task, participants read globally or temporarily ambiguous sentences with relative clauses preceded by a matrix clause containing two noun phrases (NPs). Comprehension questions modulated task difficulty: Half the participants received comprehension questions that probed their interpretation of the relative clauses whereas the remaining half received superficial questions unrelated to the relative clauses. Task difficulty affected reading times at the point of disambiguation for both L1 and L2 participants. Additionally, participants’ attachment choices for globally ambiguous sentences were consistent with reading times of the disambiguating region in both L1 and L2 readers. The results suggest that both L1 and L2 syntactic processing is modulated by the task at hand. We argue for a similar treatment of shallowness for L1 and L2 speakers in models of sentence processing, along the lines of the Good-Enough approach to language processing.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847/fullsentence processingsecond language (L2)task effectssyntactic ambiguitygood-enough processing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maryann Tan
Anouschka Foltz
spellingShingle Maryann Tan
Anouschka Foltz
Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading
Frontiers in Psychology
sentence processing
second language (L2)
task effects
syntactic ambiguity
good-enough processing
author_facet Maryann Tan
Anouschka Foltz
author_sort Maryann Tan
title Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading
title_short Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading
title_full Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading
title_fullStr Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading
title_full_unstemmed Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading
title_sort task sensitivity in l2 english speakers’ syntactic processing: evidence for good-enough processing in self-paced reading
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Native (L1) and second-language (L2) sentence processing can sometimes be shallow. A Good-Enough approach suggests that speakers may engage in shallow processing if the task permits. This study tests English native speakers and native Chinese L2 learners of English to explore whether different task demands affect their sentence processing. In a self-paced reading task, participants read globally or temporarily ambiguous sentences with relative clauses preceded by a matrix clause containing two noun phrases (NPs). Comprehension questions modulated task difficulty: Half the participants received comprehension questions that probed their interpretation of the relative clauses whereas the remaining half received superficial questions unrelated to the relative clauses. Task difficulty affected reading times at the point of disambiguation for both L1 and L2 participants. Additionally, participants’ attachment choices for globally ambiguous sentences were consistent with reading times of the disambiguating region in both L1 and L2 readers. The results suggest that both L1 and L2 syntactic processing is modulated by the task at hand. We argue for a similar treatment of shallowness for L1 and L2 speakers in models of sentence processing, along the lines of the Good-Enough approach to language processing.
topic sentence processing
second language (L2)
task effects
syntactic ambiguity
good-enough processing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847/full
work_keys_str_mv AT maryanntan tasksensitivityinl2englishspeakerssyntacticprocessingevidenceforgoodenoughprocessinginselfpacedreading
AT anouschkafoltz tasksensitivityinl2englishspeakerssyntacticprocessingevidenceforgoodenoughprocessinginselfpacedreading
_version_ 1724601534400954368