HYBRID LAYER THICKNESS IN PRIMARY AND PERMANENT TEETH – A COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL ETCH ADHESIVES

Purpose: The aim this study is to compare the hybrid layer thickness and its micromorphological characteristics in samples from primary and permanent teeth following application of total etch adhesives.Materials and methods: On intact specimens of 20 primary and 10 permanent teeth was created flat d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalia Gateva, Rossitza Kabaktchieva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peytchinski Publishing 2012-05-01
Series:Journal of IMAB
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issue-2012/book2/JofIMAB2012vol18b2p191-199.pdf
id doaj-36e5b07e8c4b4751a7b7d3d9424f64f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36e5b07e8c4b4751a7b7d3d9424f64f62020-11-24T22:33:25ZengPeytchinski PublishingJournal of IMAB1312-773X2012-05-01182191199HYBRID LAYER THICKNESS IN PRIMARY AND PERMANENT TEETH – A COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL ETCH ADHESIVESNatalia GatevaRossitza KabaktchievaPurpose: The aim this study is to compare the hybrid layer thickness and its micromorphological characteristics in samples from primary and permanent teeth following application of total etch adhesives.Materials and methods: On intact specimens of 20 primary and 10 permanent teeth was created flat dentin surfaces. The patterns were divided in 6 groups. Two different total etch adhesive systems were used – one tree steps (OptiBond, Kerr) and one two steps (Exite, VivaDent). In groups 3, 4, 5 and 6 recommended etching time was used - 15 s, in groups 1 and 2 the etching time was reduced to 7 s. After applying the adhesive, resin composite build-ups were constructed. Thus restored samples are stored in saline solution for 24 hours at temperature 37 C. Then they are subjected to thermal stress in temperature between 5 C to 55 C for 1,500 cycles and to masticatory stress – 150,000 cycles with force 100 N in intervals of 0.4 s. After that the teeth are cut through the middle in medio-distal direction with a diamond disc. SEM observation was done to investigate the thickness of the hybrid layer and the presence of microgaps. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA and Tukey׳s tests.Results: SEM observation showed significant differences of the hybrid layer thickness between primary and permanent teeth under equal conditions and after different etching time. Group 6 presented the highest average thickness 8.85 μ and group 1 the lowest average in hybrid layer 3.74 μ.Conclusion: In primary teeth the hybrid layer thickness increases with the increased etching time. The hybrid layer thickness in primary teeth is greater than that of the hybrid layer in permanent teeth under equal conditions. For primary teeth it is more appropriate to reduce the etching time to 7s to obtain a hybrid layer with better qualityhttp://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issue-2012/book2/JofIMAB2012vol18b2p191-199.pdfprimary teethpermanent teethhybrid layertotal etch adhesiveetching time
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natalia Gateva
Rossitza Kabaktchieva
spellingShingle Natalia Gateva
Rossitza Kabaktchieva
HYBRID LAYER THICKNESS IN PRIMARY AND PERMANENT TEETH – A COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL ETCH ADHESIVES
Journal of IMAB
primary teeth
permanent teeth
hybrid layer
total etch adhesive
etching time
author_facet Natalia Gateva
Rossitza Kabaktchieva
author_sort Natalia Gateva
title HYBRID LAYER THICKNESS IN PRIMARY AND PERMANENT TEETH – A COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL ETCH ADHESIVES
title_short HYBRID LAYER THICKNESS IN PRIMARY AND PERMANENT TEETH – A COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL ETCH ADHESIVES
title_full HYBRID LAYER THICKNESS IN PRIMARY AND PERMANENT TEETH – A COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL ETCH ADHESIVES
title_fullStr HYBRID LAYER THICKNESS IN PRIMARY AND PERMANENT TEETH – A COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL ETCH ADHESIVES
title_full_unstemmed HYBRID LAYER THICKNESS IN PRIMARY AND PERMANENT TEETH – A COMPARISON BETWEEN TOTAL ETCH ADHESIVES
title_sort hybrid layer thickness in primary and permanent teeth – a comparison between total etch adhesives
publisher Peytchinski Publishing
series Journal of IMAB
issn 1312-773X
publishDate 2012-05-01
description Purpose: The aim this study is to compare the hybrid layer thickness and its micromorphological characteristics in samples from primary and permanent teeth following application of total etch adhesives.Materials and methods: On intact specimens of 20 primary and 10 permanent teeth was created flat dentin surfaces. The patterns were divided in 6 groups. Two different total etch adhesive systems were used – one tree steps (OptiBond, Kerr) and one two steps (Exite, VivaDent). In groups 3, 4, 5 and 6 recommended etching time was used - 15 s, in groups 1 and 2 the etching time was reduced to 7 s. After applying the adhesive, resin composite build-ups were constructed. Thus restored samples are stored in saline solution for 24 hours at temperature 37 C. Then they are subjected to thermal stress in temperature between 5 C to 55 C for 1,500 cycles and to masticatory stress – 150,000 cycles with force 100 N in intervals of 0.4 s. After that the teeth are cut through the middle in medio-distal direction with a diamond disc. SEM observation was done to investigate the thickness of the hybrid layer and the presence of microgaps. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA and Tukey׳s tests.Results: SEM observation showed significant differences of the hybrid layer thickness between primary and permanent teeth under equal conditions and after different etching time. Group 6 presented the highest average thickness 8.85 μ and group 1 the lowest average in hybrid layer 3.74 μ.Conclusion: In primary teeth the hybrid layer thickness increases with the increased etching time. The hybrid layer thickness in primary teeth is greater than that of the hybrid layer in permanent teeth under equal conditions. For primary teeth it is more appropriate to reduce the etching time to 7s to obtain a hybrid layer with better quality
topic primary teeth
permanent teeth
hybrid layer
total etch adhesive
etching time
url http://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issue-2012/book2/JofIMAB2012vol18b2p191-199.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliagateva hybridlayerthicknessinprimaryandpermanentteethacomparisonbetweentotaletchadhesives
AT rossitzakabaktchieva hybridlayerthicknessinprimaryandpermanentteethacomparisonbetweentotaletchadhesives
_version_ 1725731205660278784