Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary Care

Background: The use of a collaborative care management (CCM) model can dramatically improve short- and long-term treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with comorbid personality disorder (PD) may experience poorer treatment outcomes for MDD. Our study seeks to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeremy J. Solberg, Mark E. Deyo-Svendsen, Kelsey R. Nylander, Elliot J. Bruhl, Dagoberto Heredia, Kurt B. Angstman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-05-01
Series:Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132718773266
id doaj-36bd3333d96442dea56f47d0426be593
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36bd3333d96442dea56f47d0426be5932020-11-25T02:50:41ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Primary Care & Community Health2150-13272018-05-01910.1177/2150132718773266Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary CareJeremy J. Solberg0Mark E. Deyo-Svendsen1Kelsey R. Nylander2Elliot J. Bruhl3Dagoberto Heredia4Kurt B. Angstman5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USAMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USAMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USAMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USAMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USAMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USABackground: The use of a collaborative care management (CCM) model can dramatically improve short- and long-term treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with comorbid personality disorder (PD) may experience poorer treatment outcomes for MDD. Our study seeks to examine the differences in MDD treatment outcomes for patients with comorbid PD when using a CCM approach rather than usual care (UC). Methods: In our retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the records of 9614 adult patients enrolled in our depression registry with the clinical diagnosis MDD and the diagnosis of PD (Yes/No). Clinical outcomes for depression were measured with Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) scores at 6 months. Results: In our study cohort, 59.4% of patients (7.1% of which had comorbid PD) were treated with CCM, as compared with 40.6% (6.8% with PD) treated with UC. We found that the presence of a PD adversely affected clinical outcomes of remission within both groups, however, at 6 months patients with PD had significantly lower MDD remission rates when treated with UC as compared with those treated with CCM (11.5% vs 25.2%, P = .002). Patients with PD in the UC group were also noted to have an increased rate of persistent depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥10) at 6 months as compared with those in the CCM group (67.7% vs 51.7%, P = .004). Conclusions: In patients with comorbid MDD and PD, clinical outcomes at 6 months were significantly improved when treated with CCM compared with UC. This finding is encouraging and supports the idea that CCM is an effective model for caring for patients with behavioral concerns, and it may be of even greater benefit for those patients being treated for comorbid behavioral health conditions.https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132718773266
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeremy J. Solberg
Mark E. Deyo-Svendsen
Kelsey R. Nylander
Elliot J. Bruhl
Dagoberto Heredia
Kurt B. Angstman
spellingShingle Jeremy J. Solberg
Mark E. Deyo-Svendsen
Kelsey R. Nylander
Elliot J. Bruhl
Dagoberto Heredia
Kurt B. Angstman
Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary Care
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
author_facet Jeremy J. Solberg
Mark E. Deyo-Svendsen
Kelsey R. Nylander
Elliot J. Bruhl
Dagoberto Heredia
Kurt B. Angstman
author_sort Jeremy J. Solberg
title Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary Care
title_short Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary Care
title_full Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary Care
title_fullStr Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary Care
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary Care
title_sort collaborative care management associated with improved depression outcomes in patients with personality disorders, compared to usual primary care
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
issn 2150-1327
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Background: The use of a collaborative care management (CCM) model can dramatically improve short- and long-term treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with comorbid personality disorder (PD) may experience poorer treatment outcomes for MDD. Our study seeks to examine the differences in MDD treatment outcomes for patients with comorbid PD when using a CCM approach rather than usual care (UC). Methods: In our retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the records of 9614 adult patients enrolled in our depression registry with the clinical diagnosis MDD and the diagnosis of PD (Yes/No). Clinical outcomes for depression were measured with Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) scores at 6 months. Results: In our study cohort, 59.4% of patients (7.1% of which had comorbid PD) were treated with CCM, as compared with 40.6% (6.8% with PD) treated with UC. We found that the presence of a PD adversely affected clinical outcomes of remission within both groups, however, at 6 months patients with PD had significantly lower MDD remission rates when treated with UC as compared with those treated with CCM (11.5% vs 25.2%, P = .002). Patients with PD in the UC group were also noted to have an increased rate of persistent depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥10) at 6 months as compared with those in the CCM group (67.7% vs 51.7%, P = .004). Conclusions: In patients with comorbid MDD and PD, clinical outcomes at 6 months were significantly improved when treated with CCM compared with UC. This finding is encouraging and supports the idea that CCM is an effective model for caring for patients with behavioral concerns, and it may be of even greater benefit for those patients being treated for comorbid behavioral health conditions.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132718773266
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremyjsolberg collaborativecaremanagementassociatedwithimproveddepressionoutcomesinpatientswithpersonalitydisorderscomparedtousualprimarycare
AT markedeyosvendsen collaborativecaremanagementassociatedwithimproveddepressionoutcomesinpatientswithpersonalitydisorderscomparedtousualprimarycare
AT kelseyrnylander collaborativecaremanagementassociatedwithimproveddepressionoutcomesinpatientswithpersonalitydisorderscomparedtousualprimarycare
AT elliotjbruhl collaborativecaremanagementassociatedwithimproveddepressionoutcomesinpatientswithpersonalitydisorderscomparedtousualprimarycare
AT dagobertoheredia collaborativecaremanagementassociatedwithimproveddepressionoutcomesinpatientswithpersonalitydisorderscomparedtousualprimarycare
AT kurtbangstman collaborativecaremanagementassociatedwithimproveddepressionoutcomesinpatientswithpersonalitydisorderscomparedtousualprimarycare
_version_ 1724737147113570304