Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Finding effective intervention strategies to combat rising obesity levels could significantly reduce the burden that obesity and associated non-communicable diseases places on both individuals and the National Health Service. Methods In this parallel randomised-controlled trial,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aidan Q. Innes, Greig Thomson, Mary Cotter, James A. King, Niels B. J. Vollaard, Benjamin M. Kelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8061-x
id doaj-36acc83e48da4843b1e7017f131a80d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36acc83e48da4843b1e7017f131a80d62020-12-27T12:02:33ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582019-12-0119111010.1186/s12889-019-8061-xEvaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trialAidan Q. Innes0Greig Thomson1Mary Cotter2James A. King3Niels B. J. Vollaard4Benjamin M. Kelly5Nuffield Health Research Group, Nuffield HealthNuffield Health Research Group, Nuffield HealthNuffield Health Research Group, Nuffield HealthNational Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough UniversityFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of StirlingNuffield Health Research Group, Nuffield HealthAbstract Background Finding effective intervention strategies to combat rising obesity levels could significantly reduce the burden that obesity and associated non-communicable diseases places on both individuals and the National Health Service. Methods In this parallel randomised-controlled trial, 76 participants who are overweight or obese (50 female) were given free access to a fitness centre for the duration of the 12-week intervention and randomised to one of three interventions. The commercial intervention, the Healthy Weight Programme, (HWP, n = 25, 10/15 men/women) consisted of twelve 1-h nutrition coaching sessions with a nutritionist delivered as a mixture of group and 1 to 1 sessions. In addition, twice-weekly exercise sessions (24 in total) were delivered by personal trainers for 12 weeks. The NHS intervention (n = 25, 8/17 men/women) consisted of following an entirely self-managed 12-week online NHS resource. The GYM intervention (n = 26, 8/18 men/women) received no guidance or formal intervention. All participants were provided with a gym induction for safety and both the NHS and GYM participants were familiarised with ACSM physical activity guidelines by way of a hand-out. Results The overall follow-up rate was 83%. Body mass was significantly reduced at post-intervention in all groups (HWP: N = 18, − 5.17 ± 4.22 kg, NHS: N = 21–4.19 ± 5.49 kg; GYM: N = 24–1.17 ± 3.00 kg; p < 0.001) with greater reductions observed in HWP and NHS groups compared to GYM (p < 0.05). Out with body mass and BMI, there were no additional statistically significant time x intervention interaction effects. Conclusions This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of both a free online NHS self-help weight-loss tool and a commercial weight loss programme that provides face-to-face nutritional support and supervised exercise. The findings suggest that both interventions are superior to an active control condition with regard to eliciting short-term weight-loss. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry - ISRCTN31489026. Prospectively registered: 27/07/16.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8061-xWeight lossExerciseWeight reduction programs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aidan Q. Innes
Greig Thomson
Mary Cotter
James A. King
Niels B. J. Vollaard
Benjamin M. Kelly
spellingShingle Aidan Q. Innes
Greig Thomson
Mary Cotter
James A. King
Niels B. J. Vollaard
Benjamin M. Kelly
Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial
BMC Public Health
Weight loss
Exercise
Weight reduction programs
author_facet Aidan Q. Innes
Greig Thomson
Mary Cotter
James A. King
Niels B. J. Vollaard
Benjamin M. Kelly
author_sort Aidan Q. Innes
title Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Background Finding effective intervention strategies to combat rising obesity levels could significantly reduce the burden that obesity and associated non-communicable diseases places on both individuals and the National Health Service. Methods In this parallel randomised-controlled trial, 76 participants who are overweight or obese (50 female) were given free access to a fitness centre for the duration of the 12-week intervention and randomised to one of three interventions. The commercial intervention, the Healthy Weight Programme, (HWP, n = 25, 10/15 men/women) consisted of twelve 1-h nutrition coaching sessions with a nutritionist delivered as a mixture of group and 1 to 1 sessions. In addition, twice-weekly exercise sessions (24 in total) were delivered by personal trainers for 12 weeks. The NHS intervention (n = 25, 8/17 men/women) consisted of following an entirely self-managed 12-week online NHS resource. The GYM intervention (n = 26, 8/18 men/women) received no guidance or formal intervention. All participants were provided with a gym induction for safety and both the NHS and GYM participants were familiarised with ACSM physical activity guidelines by way of a hand-out. Results The overall follow-up rate was 83%. Body mass was significantly reduced at post-intervention in all groups (HWP: N = 18, − 5.17 ± 4.22 kg, NHS: N = 21–4.19 ± 5.49 kg; GYM: N = 24–1.17 ± 3.00 kg; p < 0.001) with greater reductions observed in HWP and NHS groups compared to GYM (p < 0.05). Out with body mass and BMI, there were no additional statistically significant time x intervention interaction effects. Conclusions This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of both a free online NHS self-help weight-loss tool and a commercial weight loss programme that provides face-to-face nutritional support and supervised exercise. The findings suggest that both interventions are superior to an active control condition with regard to eliciting short-term weight-loss. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry - ISRCTN31489026. Prospectively registered: 27/07/16.
topic Weight loss
Exercise
Weight reduction programs
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8061-x
work_keys_str_mv AT aidanqinnes evaluatingdifferencesintheclinicalimpactofafreeonlineweightlossprogrammearesourceintensivecommercialweightlossprogrammeandanactivecontrolconditionaparallelrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT greigthomson evaluatingdifferencesintheclinicalimpactofafreeonlineweightlossprogrammearesourceintensivecommercialweightlossprogrammeandanactivecontrolconditionaparallelrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marycotter evaluatingdifferencesintheclinicalimpactofafreeonlineweightlossprogrammearesourceintensivecommercialweightlossprogrammeandanactivecontrolconditionaparallelrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jamesaking evaluatingdifferencesintheclinicalimpactofafreeonlineweightlossprogrammearesourceintensivecommercialweightlossprogrammeandanactivecontrolconditionaparallelrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nielsbjvollaard evaluatingdifferencesintheclinicalimpactofafreeonlineweightlossprogrammearesourceintensivecommercialweightlossprogrammeandanactivecontrolconditionaparallelrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT benjaminmkelly evaluatingdifferencesintheclinicalimpactofafreeonlineweightlossprogrammearesourceintensivecommercialweightlossprogrammeandanactivecontrolconditionaparallelrandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724369478610845696