Overall Memory Impairment Identification with Mathematical Modeling of the CVLT-II Learning Curve in Multiple Sclerosis

The CVLT-II provides standardized scores for each of the List A five learning trials, so that the clinician can compare the patient's raw trials 1–5 scores with standardized ones. However, frequently, a patient's raw scores fluctuate making a proper interpretation difficult. The CVLT-II do...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Igor I. Stepanov, Charles I. Abramson, Marietta Hoogs, Ralph H. B. Benedict
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Multiple Sclerosis International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/312503
id doaj-3697fe03093141f4beb0316e5f06365b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3697fe03093141f4beb0316e5f06365b2020-11-24T23:21:14ZengHindawi LimitedMultiple Sclerosis International2090-26542090-26622012-01-01201210.1155/2012/312503312503Overall Memory Impairment Identification with Mathematical Modeling of the CVLT-II Learning Curve in Multiple SclerosisIgor I. Stepanov0Charles I. Abramson1Marietta Hoogs2Ralph H. B. Benedict3Department of Neuropharmacology, Institute for Experimental Medicine, The Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Acad. Pavlov Street 12, 197376 St. Petersburg, RussiaDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 N. Murray, Stillwater, OK 74078, USAThe Jacobs Neurological Institute, Buffalo General Hospital, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY 14203, USAThe Jacobs Neurological Institute, Buffalo General Hospital, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY 14203, USAThe CVLT-II provides standardized scores for each of the List A five learning trials, so that the clinician can compare the patient's raw trials 1–5 scores with standardized ones. However, frequently, a patient's raw scores fluctuate making a proper interpretation difficult. The CVLT-II does not offer any other methods for classifying a patient's learning and memory status on the background of the learning curve. The main objective of this research is to illustrate that discriminant analysis provides an accurate assessment of the learning curve, if suitable predictor variables are selected. Normal controls were ninety-eight healthy volunteers (78 females and 20 males). A group of MS patients included 365 patients (266 females and 99 males) with clinically defined multiple sclerosis. We show that the best predictor variables are coefficients 𝐵3 and 𝐵4 of our mathematical model 𝐵3∗exp(−𝐵2∗(𝑋−1))+𝐵4∗(1−exp(−𝐵2∗(𝑋−1))) because discriminant functions, calculated separately for 𝐵3 and 𝐵4, allow nearly 100% correct classification. These predictors allow identification of separate impairment of readiness to learn or ability to learn, or both.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/312503
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Igor I. Stepanov
Charles I. Abramson
Marietta Hoogs
Ralph H. B. Benedict
spellingShingle Igor I. Stepanov
Charles I. Abramson
Marietta Hoogs
Ralph H. B. Benedict
Overall Memory Impairment Identification with Mathematical Modeling of the CVLT-II Learning Curve in Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis International
author_facet Igor I. Stepanov
Charles I. Abramson
Marietta Hoogs
Ralph H. B. Benedict
author_sort Igor I. Stepanov
title Overall Memory Impairment Identification with Mathematical Modeling of the CVLT-II Learning Curve in Multiple Sclerosis
title_short Overall Memory Impairment Identification with Mathematical Modeling of the CVLT-II Learning Curve in Multiple Sclerosis
title_full Overall Memory Impairment Identification with Mathematical Modeling of the CVLT-II Learning Curve in Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr Overall Memory Impairment Identification with Mathematical Modeling of the CVLT-II Learning Curve in Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Overall Memory Impairment Identification with Mathematical Modeling of the CVLT-II Learning Curve in Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort overall memory impairment identification with mathematical modeling of the cvlt-ii learning curve in multiple sclerosis
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Multiple Sclerosis International
issn 2090-2654
2090-2662
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The CVLT-II provides standardized scores for each of the List A five learning trials, so that the clinician can compare the patient's raw trials 1–5 scores with standardized ones. However, frequently, a patient's raw scores fluctuate making a proper interpretation difficult. The CVLT-II does not offer any other methods for classifying a patient's learning and memory status on the background of the learning curve. The main objective of this research is to illustrate that discriminant analysis provides an accurate assessment of the learning curve, if suitable predictor variables are selected. Normal controls were ninety-eight healthy volunteers (78 females and 20 males). A group of MS patients included 365 patients (266 females and 99 males) with clinically defined multiple sclerosis. We show that the best predictor variables are coefficients 𝐵3 and 𝐵4 of our mathematical model 𝐵3∗exp(−𝐵2∗(𝑋−1))+𝐵4∗(1−exp(−𝐵2∗(𝑋−1))) because discriminant functions, calculated separately for 𝐵3 and 𝐵4, allow nearly 100% correct classification. These predictors allow identification of separate impairment of readiness to learn or ability to learn, or both.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/312503
work_keys_str_mv AT igoristepanov overallmemoryimpairmentidentificationwithmathematicalmodelingofthecvltiilearningcurveinmultiplesclerosis
AT charlesiabramson overallmemoryimpairmentidentificationwithmathematicalmodelingofthecvltiilearningcurveinmultiplesclerosis
AT mariettahoogs overallmemoryimpairmentidentificationwithmathematicalmodelingofthecvltiilearningcurveinmultiplesclerosis
AT ralphhbbenedict overallmemoryimpairmentidentificationwithmathematicalmodelingofthecvltiilearningcurveinmultiplesclerosis
_version_ 1725572128455000064