Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Gordon ePennycook, Robert Malcolm Ross
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-01
Series:	Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:	individual differences biases numeracy dual-process theory Cognitive Reflection Test
Online Access:	http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009/full

id	doaj-365d2c88b2da4efdbf4eb88c9d94e634
record_format	Article
spelling	doaj-365d2c88b2da4efdbf4eb88c9d94e6342020-11-25T00:24:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-01-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009171507Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision makingGordon ePennycook0Robert Malcolm Ross1Robert Malcolm Ross2University of WaterlooRoyal Holloway, University of LondonARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie Universityhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009/fullindividual differencesbiasesnumeracydual-process theoryCognitive Reflection Test
collection	DOAJ
language	English
format	Article
sources	DOAJ
author	Gordon ePennycook Robert Malcolm Ross Robert Malcolm Ross
spellingShingle	Gordon ePennycook Robert Malcolm Ross Robert Malcolm Ross Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making Frontiers in Psychology individual differences biases numeracy dual-process theory Cognitive Reflection Test
author_facet	Gordon ePennycook Robert Malcolm Ross Robert Malcolm Ross
author_sort	Gordon ePennycook
title	Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
title_short	Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
title_full	Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
title_fullStr	Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
title_full_unstemmed	Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
title_sort	commentary: cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
publisher	Frontiers Media S.A.
series	Frontiers in Psychology
issn	1664-1078
publishDate	2016-01-01
topic	individual differences biases numeracy dual-process theory Cognitive Reflection Test
url	http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009/full
work_keys_str_mv	AT gordonepennycook commentarycognitivereflectionvscalculationindecisionmaking AT robertmalcolmross commentarycognitivereflectionvscalculationindecisionmaking AT robertmalcolmross commentarycognitivereflectionvscalculationindecisionmaking
_version_	1725352736201900032

Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making

Similar Items