Comparison between a Computational Seated Human Model and Experimental Verification Data

Sitting-acquired deep tissue injuries (SADTI) are the most serious type of pressure ulcers. In order to investigate the aetiology of SADTI a new approach is under development: a musculo-skeletal model which can predict forces between the chair and the human body at different seated postures. This st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian G. Olesen, Mark de Zee, John Rasmussen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ABB-140105
id doaj-365582c860ec464f9a983aaae612f372
record_format Article
spelling doaj-365582c860ec464f9a983aaae612f3722021-07-02T06:30:04ZengHindawi LimitedApplied Bionics and Biomechanics1176-23221754-21032014-01-0111417518310.3233/ABB-140105Comparison between a Computational Seated Human Model and Experimental Verification DataChristian G. Olesen0Mark de Zee1John Rasmussen2Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, DenmarkDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, DenmarkDepartment of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, DenmarkSitting-acquired deep tissue injuries (SADTI) are the most serious type of pressure ulcers. In order to investigate the aetiology of SADTI a new approach is under development: a musculo-skeletal model which can predict forces between the chair and the human body at different seated postures. This study focuses on comparing results from a model developed in the AnyBody Modeling System, with data collected from an experimental setup. A chair with force-measuring equipment was developed, an experiment was conducted with three subjects, and the experimental results were compared with the predictions of the computational model. The results show that the model predicted the reaction forces for different chair postures well. The correlation coefficients of how well the experiment and model correlate for the seat angle, backrest angle and footrest height was 0.93, 0.96, and 0.95. The study show a good agreement between experimental data and model prediction of forces between a human body and a chair. The model can in the future be used in designing wheelchairs or automotive seats.http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ABB-140105
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christian G. Olesen
Mark de Zee
John Rasmussen
spellingShingle Christian G. Olesen
Mark de Zee
John Rasmussen
Comparison between a Computational Seated Human Model and Experimental Verification Data
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
author_facet Christian G. Olesen
Mark de Zee
John Rasmussen
author_sort Christian G. Olesen
title Comparison between a Computational Seated Human Model and Experimental Verification Data
title_short Comparison between a Computational Seated Human Model and Experimental Verification Data
title_full Comparison between a Computational Seated Human Model and Experimental Verification Data
title_fullStr Comparison between a Computational Seated Human Model and Experimental Verification Data
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between a Computational Seated Human Model and Experimental Verification Data
title_sort comparison between a computational seated human model and experimental verification data
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
issn 1176-2322
1754-2103
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Sitting-acquired deep tissue injuries (SADTI) are the most serious type of pressure ulcers. In order to investigate the aetiology of SADTI a new approach is under development: a musculo-skeletal model which can predict forces between the chair and the human body at different seated postures. This study focuses on comparing results from a model developed in the AnyBody Modeling System, with data collected from an experimental setup. A chair with force-measuring equipment was developed, an experiment was conducted with three subjects, and the experimental results were compared with the predictions of the computational model. The results show that the model predicted the reaction forces for different chair postures well. The correlation coefficients of how well the experiment and model correlate for the seat angle, backrest angle and footrest height was 0.93, 0.96, and 0.95. The study show a good agreement between experimental data and model prediction of forces between a human body and a chair. The model can in the future be used in designing wheelchairs or automotive seats.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ABB-140105
work_keys_str_mv AT christiangolesen comparisonbetweenacomputationalseatedhumanmodelandexperimentalverificationdata
AT markdezee comparisonbetweenacomputationalseatedhumanmodelandexperimentalverificationdata
AT johnrasmussen comparisonbetweenacomputationalseatedhumanmodelandexperimentalverificationdata
_version_ 1721337138351439872