Evaluating uncertainties in modelling the snow hydrology of the Fraser River Basin, British Columbia, Canada
This study evaluates predictive uncertainties in the snow hydrology of the Fraser River Basin (FRB) of British Columbia (BC), Canada, using the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model forced with several high-resolution gridded climate datasets. These datasets include the Canadian Precipitation A...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/1827/2017/hess-21-1827-2017.pdf |
Summary: | This study evaluates predictive uncertainties in the snow hydrology of the
Fraser River Basin (FRB) of British Columbia (BC), Canada, using the Variable
Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model forced with several high-resolution gridded
climate datasets. These datasets include the Canadian Precipitation Analysis
and the thin-plate smoothing splines (ANUSPLIN), North American Regional
Reanalysis (NARR), University of Washington (UW) and Pacific Climate Impacts
Consortium (PCIC) gridded products. Uncertainties are evaluated at different
stages of the VIC implementation, starting with the driving datasets,
optimization of model parameters, and model calibration during cool and warm
phases of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO).
<br><br>
The inter-comparison of the forcing datasets (precipitation and air
temperature) and their VIC simulations (snow water equivalent – SWE – and runoff) reveals widespread differences over the FRB, especially in
mountainous regions. The ANUSPLIN precipitation shows a considerable dry bias
in the Rocky Mountains, whereas the NARR winter air temperature is
2 °C warmer than the other datasets over most of the FRB. In the VIC
simulations, the elevation-dependent changes in the maximum SWE (maxSWE) are
more prominent at higher elevations of the Rocky Mountains, where the
PCIC-VIC simulation accumulates too much SWE and ANUSPLIN-VIC yields an
underestimation. Additionally, at each elevation range, the day of maxSWE
varies from 10 to 20 days between the VIC simulations. The snow melting
season begins early in the NARR-VIC simulation, whereas the PCIC-VIC
simulation delays the melting, indicating seasonal uncertainty in SWE
simulations. When compared with the observed runoff for the Fraser River main
stem at Hope, BC, the ANUSPLIN-VIC simulation shows considerable
underestimation of runoff throughout the water year owing to reduced
precipitation in the ANUSPLIN forcing dataset. The NARR-VIC simulation yields
more winter and spring runoff and earlier decline of flows in summer due to a
nearly 15-day earlier onset of the FRB springtime snowmelt.
<br><br>
Analysis of the parametric uncertainty in the VIC calibration process shows
that the choice of the initial parameter range plays a crucial role in
defining the model hydrological response for the FRB. Furthermore, the VIC
calibration process is biased toward cool and warm phases of the PDO and the
choice of proper calibration and validation time periods is important for
the experimental setup. Overall the VIC hydrological response is prominently
influenced by the uncertainties involved in the forcing datasets rather than
those in its parameter optimization and experimental setups. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1027-5606 1607-7938 |