The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software

Background: It is standard practice for total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients to have post-operative imaging, and one of the reasons is to assess the adequacy of acetabular component position. Correct positioning of the acetabular component is important for successful outcome in THA. Acetabular comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jack Lahy, Jarrad Stevens, Dean McKenzie, Richard de Steiger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-07-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017718953
id doaj-3635043e3cc1443a853e5b4a78b753d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3635043e3cc1443a853e5b4a78b753d92020-11-25T03:22:59ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902017-07-012510.1177/2309499017718953The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging softwareJack Lahy0Jarrad Stevens1Dean McKenzie2Richard de Steiger3 Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, AustraliaBackground: It is standard practice for total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients to have post-operative imaging, and one of the reasons is to assess the adequacy of acetabular component position. Correct positioning of the acetabular component is important for successful outcome in THA. Acetabular component position can be measured from either computed tomography (CT) or plain radiographs. While CT is the gold standard for accurately measuring acetabular component position, radiographs are routinely used for post-operative evaluation. However, measurement of acetabular component position from plain radiographs is not straightforward and numerous methods have been proposed. As most imaging is now digital, the aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of one method to measure acetabular component position using a basic diagnostic imaging software program that is readily available to orthopaedic surgeons. Methods: We investigated the reliability Lewinnek’s method using a basic Picture Archiving and Communication System program, InteleViewer ™ . We measured 69 post-operative anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of patients who underwent primary THA. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability for Lewinnek’s method was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: Our results showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability for both inclination (0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99–1.0; and 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95–0.99) and anteversion (0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99; and 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.96) measurements. Conclusion: This study has shown that using Lewinnek’s method, acetabular component position can be reliably measured on post-operative AP digital radiographs using readily available software tools.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017718953
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jack Lahy
Jarrad Stevens
Dean McKenzie
Richard de Steiger
spellingShingle Jack Lahy
Jarrad Stevens
Dean McKenzie
Richard de Steiger
The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Jack Lahy
Jarrad Stevens
Dean McKenzie
Richard de Steiger
author_sort Jack Lahy
title The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software
title_short The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software
title_full The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software
title_fullStr The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software
title_full_unstemmed The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software
title_sort reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Background: It is standard practice for total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients to have post-operative imaging, and one of the reasons is to assess the adequacy of acetabular component position. Correct positioning of the acetabular component is important for successful outcome in THA. Acetabular component position can be measured from either computed tomography (CT) or plain radiographs. While CT is the gold standard for accurately measuring acetabular component position, radiographs are routinely used for post-operative evaluation. However, measurement of acetabular component position from plain radiographs is not straightforward and numerous methods have been proposed. As most imaging is now digital, the aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of one method to measure acetabular component position using a basic diagnostic imaging software program that is readily available to orthopaedic surgeons. Methods: We investigated the reliability Lewinnek’s method using a basic Picture Archiving and Communication System program, InteleViewer ™ . We measured 69 post-operative anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of patients who underwent primary THA. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability for Lewinnek’s method was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: Our results showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability for both inclination (0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99–1.0; and 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95–0.99) and anteversion (0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99; and 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.96) measurements. Conclusion: This study has shown that using Lewinnek’s method, acetabular component position can be reliably measured on post-operative AP digital radiographs using readily available software tools.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017718953
work_keys_str_mv AT jacklahy thereliabilityofmeasuringacetabularcomponentpositiononradiographsusingeverydaydiagnosticimagingsoftware
AT jarradstevens thereliabilityofmeasuringacetabularcomponentpositiononradiographsusingeverydaydiagnosticimagingsoftware
AT deanmckenzie thereliabilityofmeasuringacetabularcomponentpositiononradiographsusingeverydaydiagnosticimagingsoftware
AT richarddesteiger thereliabilityofmeasuringacetabularcomponentpositiononradiographsusingeverydaydiagnosticimagingsoftware
AT jacklahy reliabilityofmeasuringacetabularcomponentpositiononradiographsusingeverydaydiagnosticimagingsoftware
AT jarradstevens reliabilityofmeasuringacetabularcomponentpositiononradiographsusingeverydaydiagnosticimagingsoftware
AT deanmckenzie reliabilityofmeasuringacetabularcomponentpositiononradiographsusingeverydaydiagnosticimagingsoftware
AT richarddesteiger reliabilityofmeasuringacetabularcomponentpositiononradiographsusingeverydaydiagnosticimagingsoftware
_version_ 1724608543228690432