Michel Foucault, Bruno Latour e algumas linhas de fuga na produção de conhecimentos

This article discusses some alterations that may be produced in the 'psy' field on the basis of Michel Foucault's and Bruno Latour's work by highlighting that in our view make this connection possible and fertile. Firstly, we gather questionings about the epistemological bases on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simone Maria Hüning, Neuza Maria de Fátima Guareschi
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) 2011-01-01
Series:Ciências Sociais Unisinos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93820778007
id doaj-36189f1aff75402ba3fa3fb3065a36af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36189f1aff75402ba3fa3fb3065a36af2021-10-08T16:04:18ZporUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)Ciências Sociais Unisinos2177-62292011-01-014716471Michel Foucault, Bruno Latour e algumas linhas de fuga na produção de conhecimentosSimone Maria HüningNeuza Maria de Fátima GuareschiThis article discusses some alterations that may be produced in the 'psy' field on the basis of Michel Foucault's and Bruno Latour's work by highlighting that in our view make this connection possible and fertile. Firstly, we gather questionings about the epistemological bases on which psychology has been founded in order to become scientific, as well as about the dichotomy between natural sciences and human sciences. Secondly, we turn our attention to Foucault's and Latour's works to discuss rituals of production and regulation of scientific discourses. In order to relate these authors' contributions to the 'psy' field, in the third part of this text we point out some strategies that make the political field visible in the production of knowledge and signal the necessary process of making explicit the network of interests that is involved in sciences. Finally, we redirect our look to psychology and the production of subjectivity, pointing out the close relationship between scientific production and the production of ways of living and governing.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93820778007sciencesscientific discoursesways of living and governing
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simone Maria Hüning
Neuza Maria de Fátima Guareschi
spellingShingle Simone Maria Hüning
Neuza Maria de Fátima Guareschi
Michel Foucault, Bruno Latour e algumas linhas de fuga na produção de conhecimentos
Ciências Sociais Unisinos
sciences
scientific discourses
ways of living and governing
author_facet Simone Maria Hüning
Neuza Maria de Fátima Guareschi
author_sort Simone Maria Hüning
title Michel Foucault, Bruno Latour e algumas linhas de fuga na produção de conhecimentos
title_short Michel Foucault, Bruno Latour e algumas linhas de fuga na produção de conhecimentos
title_full Michel Foucault, Bruno Latour e algumas linhas de fuga na produção de conhecimentos
title_fullStr Michel Foucault, Bruno Latour e algumas linhas de fuga na produção de conhecimentos
title_full_unstemmed Michel Foucault, Bruno Latour e algumas linhas de fuga na produção de conhecimentos
title_sort michel foucault, bruno latour e algumas linhas de fuga na produção de conhecimentos
publisher Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
series Ciências Sociais Unisinos
issn 2177-6229
publishDate 2011-01-01
description This article discusses some alterations that may be produced in the 'psy' field on the basis of Michel Foucault's and Bruno Latour's work by highlighting that in our view make this connection possible and fertile. Firstly, we gather questionings about the epistemological bases on which psychology has been founded in order to become scientific, as well as about the dichotomy between natural sciences and human sciences. Secondly, we turn our attention to Foucault's and Latour's works to discuss rituals of production and regulation of scientific discourses. In order to relate these authors' contributions to the 'psy' field, in the third part of this text we point out some strategies that make the political field visible in the production of knowledge and signal the necessary process of making explicit the network of interests that is involved in sciences. Finally, we redirect our look to psychology and the production of subjectivity, pointing out the close relationship between scientific production and the production of ways of living and governing.
topic sciences
scientific discourses
ways of living and governing
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93820778007
work_keys_str_mv AT simonemariahuning michelfoucaultbrunolatourealgumaslinhasdefuganaproducaodeconhecimentos
AT neuzamariadefatimaguareschi michelfoucaultbrunolatourealgumaslinhasdefuganaproducaodeconhecimentos
_version_ 1716833086425006080