Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomes

Purpose: The purpose of the study was two-fold. Firstly it was to assess the suitability for tubal recanalization and factors predicting successful laparoscopic recanalization. Secondly, it was to analyze the fertility outcomes and factors affecting the pregnancy rate following laparoscopic tubal re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K Jayakrishnan, Sumeet N Baheti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2011-01-01
Series:Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2011;volume=4;issue=3;spage=125;epage=129;aulast=Jayakrishnan
id doaj-360aacf6517545dda356b16bd1395364
record_format Article
spelling doaj-360aacf6517545dda356b16bd13953642020-11-25T00:09:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences0974-12081998-47662011-01-014312512910.4103/0974-1208.92286Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomesK JayakrishnanSumeet N BahetiPurpose: The purpose of the study was two-fold. Firstly it was to assess the suitability for tubal recanalization and factors predicting successful laparoscopic recanalization. Secondly, it was to analyze the fertility outcomes and factors affecting the pregnancy rate following laparoscopic tubal recanalization. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of prospectively followed-up 29 women at a tertiary care center seeking tubal sterilization reversal between May 2005 and February 2010 were included. Results: In 14 (48.3%) women unilateral tubes were suitable and in only 3 women (10.3%) bilateral tubes were suitable. All cases with laparoscopic tubal sterilization were suitable, whereas all cases with fimbriectomy were unsuitable for recanalization. In 6 (20.7%) cases salphingostomy was performed as an alternative procedure to tubal reanastomosis. The overall pregnancy rate was 58.8%. In cases with sterilization by Pomeroy′s method, 4 out of 10 (40%) conceived, whereas for laparoscopic tubal ligation cases 6 out of 7 (85.7%) conceived (P=0.32). None of the patients with final tubal length <5 cm conceived (P=0.03). Comparing the age at recanalization, in women ≤30 years, 71.4% conceived, as compared with 50% when age of women was more than 30 years (P=0.37). Conclusions: The important factors determining the success of recanalization are technique of sterilization and the remaining length of the tube after recanalization. The gynecologist must use an effective technique of sterilization to minimize the failure rates, but at the same time, which causes minimal trauma, and aim at preserving the length of the tube so that reversal is more likely to be successful, should the patient′s circumstances change.http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2011;volume=4;issue=3;spage=125;epage=129;aulast=JayakrishnanFimbriectomypregnancy ratesterilization reversaltubal recanalization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K Jayakrishnan
Sumeet N Baheti
spellingShingle K Jayakrishnan
Sumeet N Baheti
Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomes
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Fimbriectomy
pregnancy rate
sterilization reversal
tubal recanalization
author_facet K Jayakrishnan
Sumeet N Baheti
author_sort K Jayakrishnan
title Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomes
title_short Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomes
title_full Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomes
title_fullStr Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomes
title_sort laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomes
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
issn 0974-1208
1998-4766
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Purpose: The purpose of the study was two-fold. Firstly it was to assess the suitability for tubal recanalization and factors predicting successful laparoscopic recanalization. Secondly, it was to analyze the fertility outcomes and factors affecting the pregnancy rate following laparoscopic tubal recanalization. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of prospectively followed-up 29 women at a tertiary care center seeking tubal sterilization reversal between May 2005 and February 2010 were included. Results: In 14 (48.3%) women unilateral tubes were suitable and in only 3 women (10.3%) bilateral tubes were suitable. All cases with laparoscopic tubal sterilization were suitable, whereas all cases with fimbriectomy were unsuitable for recanalization. In 6 (20.7%) cases salphingostomy was performed as an alternative procedure to tubal reanastomosis. The overall pregnancy rate was 58.8%. In cases with sterilization by Pomeroy′s method, 4 out of 10 (40%) conceived, whereas for laparoscopic tubal ligation cases 6 out of 7 (85.7%) conceived (P=0.32). None of the patients with final tubal length <5 cm conceived (P=0.03). Comparing the age at recanalization, in women ≤30 years, 71.4% conceived, as compared with 50% when age of women was more than 30 years (P=0.37). Conclusions: The important factors determining the success of recanalization are technique of sterilization and the remaining length of the tube after recanalization. The gynecologist must use an effective technique of sterilization to minimize the failure rates, but at the same time, which causes minimal trauma, and aim at preserving the length of the tube so that reversal is more likely to be successful, should the patient′s circumstances change.
topic Fimbriectomy
pregnancy rate
sterilization reversal
tubal recanalization
url http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2011;volume=4;issue=3;spage=125;epage=129;aulast=Jayakrishnan
work_keys_str_mv AT kjayakrishnan laparoscopictubalsterilizationreversalandfertilityoutcomes
AT sumeetnbaheti laparoscopictubalsterilizationreversalandfertilityoutcomes
_version_ 1725411543090200576