IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES
The constitutional rules concerning provisional measures have been frequently altered since the Brazilian Constitution was promulgated in 1988. Some of these changes were formally made, such as the 21st Constitutional Amendment, while others were informally processed. The article seeks to analyze fo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Revista de Estudos Institucionais |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://estudosinstitucionais.com/REI/article/view/464 |
id |
doaj-35ff450ef0d44dc6b0afd6d4916bd8fd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-35ff450ef0d44dc6b0afd6d4916bd8fd2020-11-25T03:21:44ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRevista de Estudos Institucionais2447-54672020-04-016115518310.21783/rei.v6i1.464197IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULESLeandro Molhano Ribeiro0Mariana Novotny Muniz1Professor Escola de Direito do Rio da Fundação Getulio VargasGraduanda em Direito na Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV Direito Rio)The constitutional rules concerning provisional measures have been frequently altered since the Brazilian Constitution was promulgated in 1988. Some of these changes were formally made, such as the 21st Constitutional Amendment, while others were informally processed. The article seeks to analyze four cases in which the rules were informally altered, either through political imagination or transgression. These cases were also classified into four different types of institutional change: displacement, layering, drift or conversion. Finally, the authors contend that the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court has had the final word regarding these changes, formalizing them when the rules were reinterpreted or vetoing them when the rules were infringed.https://estudosinstitucionais.com/REI/article/view/464mudança institucionalmedidas provisóriassupremo tribunal federalprocesso legislativo |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Leandro Molhano Ribeiro Mariana Novotny Muniz |
spellingShingle |
Leandro Molhano Ribeiro Mariana Novotny Muniz IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES Revista de Estudos Institucionais mudança institucional medidas provisórias supremo tribunal federal processo legislativo |
author_facet |
Leandro Molhano Ribeiro Mariana Novotny Muniz |
author_sort |
Leandro Molhano Ribeiro |
title |
IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES |
title_short |
IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES |
title_full |
IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES |
title_fullStr |
IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES |
title_full_unstemmed |
IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES |
title_sort |
imagination, transgression and formalization: acts by the brazilian congress and supreme federal court concerning provisional measures' procedural rules |
publisher |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
series |
Revista de Estudos Institucionais |
issn |
2447-5467 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
The constitutional rules concerning provisional measures have been frequently altered since the Brazilian Constitution was promulgated in 1988. Some of these changes were formally made, such as the 21st Constitutional Amendment, while others were informally processed. The article seeks to analyze four cases in which the rules were informally altered, either through political imagination or transgression. These cases were also classified into four different types of institutional change: displacement, layering, drift or conversion. Finally, the authors contend that the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court has had the final word regarding these changes, formalizing them when the rules were reinterpreted or vetoing them when the rules were infringed. |
topic |
mudança institucional medidas provisórias supremo tribunal federal processo legislativo |
url |
https://estudosinstitucionais.com/REI/article/view/464 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leandromolhanoribeiro imaginationtransgressionandformalizationactsbythebraziliancongressandsupremefederalcourtconcerningprovisionalmeasuresproceduralrules AT mariananovotnymuniz imaginationtransgressionandformalizationactsbythebraziliancongressandsupremefederalcourtconcerningprovisionalmeasuresproceduralrules |
_version_ |
1724612820369145856 |