IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES

The constitutional rules concerning provisional measures have been frequently altered since the Brazilian Constitution was promulgated in 1988. Some of these changes were formally made, such as the 21st Constitutional Amendment, while others were informally processed. The article seeks to analyze fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leandro Molhano Ribeiro, Mariana Novotny Muniz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro 2020-04-01
Series:Revista de Estudos Institucionais
Subjects:
Online Access:https://estudosinstitucionais.com/REI/article/view/464
id doaj-35ff450ef0d44dc6b0afd6d4916bd8fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35ff450ef0d44dc6b0afd6d4916bd8fd2020-11-25T03:21:44ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRevista de Estudos Institucionais2447-54672020-04-016115518310.21783/rei.v6i1.464197IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULESLeandro Molhano Ribeiro0Mariana Novotny Muniz1Professor Escola de Direito do Rio da Fundação Getulio VargasGraduanda em Direito na Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV Direito Rio)The constitutional rules concerning provisional measures have been frequently altered since the Brazilian Constitution was promulgated in 1988. Some of these changes were formally made, such as the 21st Constitutional Amendment, while others were informally processed. The article seeks to analyze four cases in which the rules were informally altered, either through political imagination or transgression. These cases were also classified into four different types of institutional change: displacement, layering, drift or conversion. Finally, the authors contend that the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court has had the final word regarding these changes, formalizing them when the rules were reinterpreted or vetoing them when the rules were infringed.https://estudosinstitucionais.com/REI/article/view/464mudança institucionalmedidas provisóriassupremo tribunal federalprocesso legislativo
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leandro Molhano Ribeiro
Mariana Novotny Muniz
spellingShingle Leandro Molhano Ribeiro
Mariana Novotny Muniz
IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES
Revista de Estudos Institucionais
mudança institucional
medidas provisórias
supremo tribunal federal
processo legislativo
author_facet Leandro Molhano Ribeiro
Mariana Novotny Muniz
author_sort Leandro Molhano Ribeiro
title IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES
title_short IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES
title_full IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES
title_fullStr IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES
title_full_unstemmed IMAGINATION, TRANSGRESSION AND FORMALIZATION: ACTS BY THE BRAZILIAN CONGRESS AND SUPREME FEDERAL COURT CONCERNING PROVISIONAL MEASURES' PROCEDURAL RULES
title_sort imagination, transgression and formalization: acts by the brazilian congress and supreme federal court concerning provisional measures' procedural rules
publisher Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
series Revista de Estudos Institucionais
issn 2447-5467
publishDate 2020-04-01
description The constitutional rules concerning provisional measures have been frequently altered since the Brazilian Constitution was promulgated in 1988. Some of these changes were formally made, such as the 21st Constitutional Amendment, while others were informally processed. The article seeks to analyze four cases in which the rules were informally altered, either through political imagination or transgression. These cases were also classified into four different types of institutional change: displacement, layering, drift or conversion. Finally, the authors contend that the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court has had the final word regarding these changes, formalizing them when the rules were reinterpreted or vetoing them when the rules were infringed.
topic mudança institucional
medidas provisórias
supremo tribunal federal
processo legislativo
url https://estudosinstitucionais.com/REI/article/view/464
work_keys_str_mv AT leandromolhanoribeiro imaginationtransgressionandformalizationactsbythebraziliancongressandsupremefederalcourtconcerningprovisionalmeasuresproceduralrules
AT mariananovotnymuniz imaginationtransgressionandformalizationactsbythebraziliancongressandsupremefederalcourtconcerningprovisionalmeasuresproceduralrules
_version_ 1724612820369145856